![]() |
|
|
#265 | |
|
Aug 2012
Mass., USA
4768 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#266 |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
3,313 Posts |
Here's an updated list. First part is exponents from systems with at least 2x as many bad as good and already have 2 mismatches under their belt. The pair of exponents at the bottom were from systems with > 3x as many bad as good and one mismatch so far:
Code:
exponent Bad Good Unk Sus Solo Mis worktodo 35551543 8 4 4 1 3 2 DoubleCheck=35551543,71,1 36459239 8 4 4 1 3 2 DoubleCheck=36459239,71,1 37720493 8 4 4 1 3 2 DoubleCheck=37720493,71,1 41065553 18 6 2 2 2 2 DoubleCheck=41065553,72,1 41069953 2 1 8 1 7 2 DoubleCheck=41069953,72,1 41079221 12 5 11 7 5 13 DoubleCheck=41079221,72,1 41079751 3 0 3 0 1 2 DoubleCheck=41079751,72,1 41106281 4 2 6 2 4 4 DoubleCheck=41106281,72,1 ---------------- 36166439 3 0 2 0 1 1 DoubleCheck=36166439,71,1 37846999 3 1 3 0 2 1 DoubleCheck=37846999,71,1 |
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
Aug 2012
Mass., USA
4768 Posts |
I grabbed M41106281. EDIT: I grabbed M41079751, too. Last fiddled with by cuBerBruce on 2015-09-21 at 02:34 Reason: append |
|
|
|
|
#268 |
|
Aug 2015
22×17 Posts |
I took M36459239 and M37720493
|
|
|
|
|
#269 |
|
May 2015
2·5 Posts |
I took M35551543, M36166439, M37846999
|
|
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Jul 2003
So Cal
24·7·19 Posts |
And I grabbed the last 3.
|
|
|
|
|
#271 |
|
May 2015
2·5 Posts |
Triple-check needed M36166439
|
|
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
3,313 Posts |
Here's a small list of exponents that need a triple-check but could use some additional TF first:
Code:
exponent TF WorkToDo 46941787 70 Factor=46941787,70,72 48372391 70 Factor=48372391,70,72 50404819 72 Factor=50404819,72,73 52086149 72 Factor=52086149,72,73 53401553 72 Factor=53401553,72,73 Code:
exponent TF WorkToDo 45307621 70 Factor=45307621,70,72 45308561 70 Factor=45308561,70,72 45379421 70 Factor=45379421,70,72 45379463 70 Factor=45379463,70,72 46234009 71 Factor=46234009,71,72 46371389 70 Factor=46371389,70,72 46423021 71 Factor=46423021,71,72 46607801 70 Factor=46607801,70,72 46607839 70 Factor=46607839,70,72 47204021 71 Factor=47204021,71,72 47267141 71 Factor=47267141,71,72 47267153 70 Factor=47267153,70,72 47346017 71 Factor=47346017,71,72 47346023 71 Factor=47346023,71,72 48104813 71 Factor=48104813,71,72 48226081 71 Factor=48226081,71,72 48248029 71 Factor=48248029,71,72 48451693 71 Factor=48451693,71,72 50398199 70 Factor=50398199,70,73 52040731 72 Factor=52040731,72,73 52405957 72 Factor=52405957,72,73 52939417 72 Factor=52939417,72,73 53401583 72 Factor=53401583,72,73 53562269 72 Factor=53562269,72,73 54170447 72 Factor=54170447,72,73 56868607 72 Factor=56868607,72,73 74049323 73 Factor=74049323,73,74 |
|
|
|
|
#273 |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
3,313 Posts |
Looks like someone picked that up already.
I can't say for sure, because I'm not tracking the end result of these strategic double checks, but it seems like we're doing pretty good at picking out the ones that weren't done right the first time. I've been trying to leave the juicier ones for everyone else, but even with the less probable work I've been selecting, I'm still getting a different result maybe 40-50% of the time (and of course assuming mine is correct). I hope you all are getting equal or better results out of the lists I've been putting up... I'm hoping it's closer to 60-80% of the time you're (probably) proving the first result was wrong? If you want to provide feedback on how it's been going, that would be good so I'll know if this is working out well or not. I should be keeping tabs on the exponents and checking in later to see if a match was made or not, but that sounded like too much work to do. LOL |
|
|
|
|
#274 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego County
5×137 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#275 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×67×73 Posts |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Double-Double Arithmetic | Mysticial | Software | 52 | 2021-04-23 06:51 |
| Clicking an exponent leads to 404 page | marigonzes | Information & Answers | 2 | 2017-02-14 16:56 |
| x.265 half the size, double the computation; so if you double again? 1/4th? | jasong | jasong | 7 | 2015-08-17 10:56 |
| What about double-checking TF/P-1? | 137ben | PrimeNet | 6 | 2012-03-13 04:01 |
| Double the area, Double the volume. | Uncwilly | Puzzles | 8 | 2006-07-03 16:02 |