Strategic Double Clicking

[Dubslow]

Originally Posted by LaurV

(it works with P95, don't know if it works with mprime).

Save for the lack of a GUI (and the CLI in its place), mprime is exactly the same program as Prime95. I'm not even sure why the Linux version of Prime95 has its own name (maybe historical reasons relating to the most popular extant OS at the time of its creation)?

[Mark Rose]

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Probably doesn't matter, but just FYI, I hid the assignment ID in the posts above. Worst thing that could happen is someone submits a call to unassign the work and then they check in their own result first... silly hijinks aside, I don't think the AID is all that critical, but just in case. LOL

I guess you didn't trying reading the AID before removing it... it was obviously faked. I guess the joke is gone now :)

[chalsall]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I guess you didn't trying reading the AID before removing it... it was obviously faked. I guess the joke is gone now :)

Humour is such a subjective thing...

My dad didn't like decaf coffee, but did like my ca7 Decaf.

[Mark Rose]

Originally Posted by chalsall

Humour is such a subjective thing...

My dad didn't like decaf coffee, but did like my ca7 Decaf.

I'm glad someone saw it :)

[kladner]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I'm glad someone saw it :)

So run it by us again.

[Mark Rose]

Originally Posted by kladner

So run it by us again.

It was ABLEDAD5E1150DDBA11DECAFC0FFEE5 or something like that :)

[LaurV]

Of course we saw it, his comment about primenet being scentient gave it away.
Usually I am the first to say to hide those keys (see the history on the forum). Why should I keep quiet now, and even replicate it in my reply?

(Madpoo, I told you that you have too many cores! hehe)

[kladner]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

It was ABLEDAD5E1150DDBA11DECAFC0FFEE5 or something like that :)

LOL!

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I guess you didn't trying reading the AID before removing it... it was obviously faked. I guess the joke is gone now :)

Oh geez, I guess I didn't. Was it really obvious and I look like a moron now? LOL

(EDIT: Never mind, I see the other posts... yeah, I guess I just glazed right over it.)

[Madpoo]

Here's an updated list of exponents by computers with at least a 3:1 bad-to-good ratio. A couple of them are newly available and have even higher bad/good (39965311 at 7:1 and 40443413 at 5:1).

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	worktodo
37202777	18	6	1	1	DoubleCheck=37202777,71,1
37621183	3	0	1	2	DoubleCheck=37621183,71,1
37738343	3	0	15	1	DoubleCheck=37738343,71,1
39135653	9	3	2	1	DoubleCheck=39135653,71,1
39168071	9	3	1	1	DoubleCheck=39168071,71,1
39965311	7	1	4	1	DoubleCheck=39965311,71,1
40443413	30	6	3	3	DoubleCheck=40443413,72,1
42391309	3	0	3	1	DoubleCheck=42391309,72,1
42850901	3	0	15	1	DoubleCheck=42850901,72,1
43402943	3	1	8	5	DoubleCheck=43402943,72,1
43419767	3	0	3	1	DoubleCheck=43419767,72,1
43698703	3	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=43698703,72,1
43717981	3	1	8	5	DoubleCheck=43717981,72,1
43768357	3	1	8	5	DoubleCheck=43768357,72,1
44180251	3	0	11	2	DoubleCheck=44180251,72,1
44781521	3	1	8	5	DoubleCheck=44781521,72,1
45656467	3	1	3	6	DoubleCheck=45656467,72,1
46487227	3	1	8	5	DoubleCheck=46487227,72,1
46975139	3	1	8	5	DoubleCheck=46975139,72,1
49149887	3	0	11	2	DoubleCheck=49149887,72,1
49285787	3	0	11	2	DoubleCheck=49285787,72,1
49505707	3	0	11	2	DoubleCheck=49505707,72,1
49536463	3	0	11	2	DoubleCheck=49536463,72,1
49536491	3	0	11	2	DoubleCheck=49536491,72,1

[Madpoo]

This here could be a fun list. It has work done by computers with zero good, 1+ bad, and only a single unknown. So these unverified exponents could be good, could be bad... these systems don't have a great track record to start with but who knows. As you can see, some also have some suspect results, which would point those more in the direction of their unknown one being bad, but again, who can say until we double check?

There was one entry here that appeared in the above list so I've removed it to avoid confusion (it had 3 bad, zero good, 1 unknown).

The list was longer, but I snagged all of the ones above 40M for myself, leaving just these.

exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	worktodo
34939987	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=34939987,71,1
35012317	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35012317,71,1
35071667	2	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35071667,71,1
35222893	1	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=35222893,71,1
35242271	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35242271,71,1
35245307	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35245307,71,1
35282629	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35282629,71,1
35307017	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35307017,71,1
35309641	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35309641,71,1
35344391	1	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=35344391,71,1
35522653	1	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=35522653,71,1
35623529	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35623529,71,1
35668741	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35668741,71,1
35685869	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35685869,71,1
35985217	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=35985217,71,1
36036769	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36036769,71,1
36213101	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36213101,71,1
36328007	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36328007,71,1
36329911	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36329911,71,1
36385607	2	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=36385607,71,1
36446537	1	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=36446537,71,1
36510697	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36510697,71,1
36553177	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36553177,71,1
36669461	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36669461,71,1
36754247	1	0	1	3	DoubleCheck=36754247,71,1
36799891	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=36799891,71,1
37020619	2	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=37020619,71,1
37028267	2	0	1	2	DoubleCheck=37028267,71,1
37233397	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=37233397,72,1
37567781	1	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=37567781,71,1
37621739	1	0	1	0	DoubleCheck=37621739,71,1
37759933	1	0	1	1	DoubleCheck=37759933,71,1