mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > XYYXF Project

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-10-31, 12:14   #166
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

1011111111002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
C197_141_86: 20480 curves at B1=3e8 completed with no factor found; so that's the 35K done.

Shall I set the GTX970 to run polynomial search for two weeks?
Nice job on the ECM. No objection but one suggestion - search for a short time to get a baseline GNFS poly and compare to the SNFS poly to verify GNFS is the optimal path forward. If a barely acceptable GNFS poly can't beat SNFS then two weeks additional searching is unlikely to help.

Look at C186_145_72 - SNFS is slightly better than initial GNFS efforts, and now it's been suggested to me that further poly searching is not likely to help.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-10-31, 14:12   #167
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

72·131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Nice job on the ECM. No objection but one suggestion - search for a short time to get a baseline GNFS poly and compare to the SNFS poly to verify GNFS is the optimal path forward. If a barely acceptable GNFS poly can't beat SNFS then two weeks additional searching is unlikely to help.

Look at C186_145_72 - SNFS is slightly better than initial GNFS efforts, and now it's been suggested to me that further poly searching is not likely to help.
Excellent point ... the SNFS polynomial

Code:
N 19182977796570883027397612007795349768467584440992117523739592612776325655445541732585511670283636370086880565577351234162227572914093167428002460062418878069374344571514831893000598109126181591461
SKEW 0.561251022556
A6 636056
A0 19881
R0 311504538542350645715503145019022560519520256
R1 1227630238259041401156597561561
has a combined score of 8.624e-15 and an hour of GNFS-search gets me nothing more than 2.835e-15. So this is an SNFS number. I guess I'll queue it up after trial sieving ... can you suggest a target for November's ECM GPU cycles?
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-10-31, 14:39   #168
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

BFC16 Posts
Default

C192_139_81 is just coming out of t55 via yoyo. Needs 20k curves @B1=3e8. How does that sound? I'm on the road right now but will get started upon my return this weekend.

BTW - would you also queue C186_145_72 to 15e? The poly is given in post 163 of this thread. Thank you in advance. fivemack: queued

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-10-31 at 15:56
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-10-31, 16:17   #169
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

144238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
C192_139_81 is just coming out of t55 via yoyo. Needs 20k curves @B1=3e8. How does that sound? I'm on the road right now but will get started upon my return this weekend.

BTW - would you also queue C186_145_72 to 15e? The poly is given in post 163 of this thread. Thank you in advance. fivemack: queued
I think C192_139_81 is probably an SNFS target; I think we're about to run out of achievable unambiguous GNFS targets at XYYXF, the only hope is if ECM efforts knock a C6x off one of the C25x difficulty>300 numbers.

This doesn't mean I'm not going to run ECM curves on C192_139_81.

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-10-31 at 16:17
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-10-31, 19:37   #170
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·13·59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
I think C192_139_81 is probably an SNFS target; I think we're about to run out of achievable unambiguous GNFS targets at XYYXF, the only hope is if ECM efforts knock a C6x off one of the C25x difficulty>300 numbers.
Agreed.

Quote:
This doesn't mean I'm not going to run ECM curves on C192_139_81.
Excellent. I'll plug away on it as well. Even if all remaining numbers are best seived via SNFS, they still need ECM.

And thanks for queuing C186_145_72.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-01, 19:39   #171
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

23×347 Posts
Default C194_139_131

No one appears to have run any curves on C194_139_131 at B1=300M yet so I will reserve it.
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-14, 12:37   #172
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

53308 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amphoria View Post
No one appears to have run any curves on C194_139_131 at B1=300M yet so I will reserve it.
20,000 curves with B1=300M complete with no factor found.

I also ran poly select for a day and found the following poly which is a small improvement on Max's from post #152:

Code:
# norm 6.010324e-019 alpha -7.291559 e 1.119e-014 rroots 3
skew: 314183815.04
c0: 42200690310394645731006573695629365784697161008
c1: -4174931980001203202982947992258045649412
c2: 34314236194563307930578628324180
c3: 171993435884563172649601
c4: -165572939397788
c5: 130548
Y0: -48339132221599400156975896129259741483
Y1: 76780817191247017
This is another borderline GNFS/SNFS candidate so I did some trial sieving with Yafu's best candidate for SNFS of

Code:
# 139^131+131^139, difficulty: 294.30, anorm: 2.70e+038, rnorm: -1.12e+055
# scaled difficulty: 297.07, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 6.576e-015, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.615e-015, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 294
skew: 5.1292
c6: 1
c0: 18209
Y1: -4980119914244835315191043937110847348056000415691
Y0: 140063703503689367173618364344202364099995564521
However, GNFS gave a significantly better yield. The only problem is that they are both 16e jobs so are unlikely to be processed soon. Also further poly select will be required for GNFS as the msieve target is 1.16e-014 to < 1.33e-014.
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-15, 08:41   #173
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

494710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amphoria View Post
However, GNFS gave a significantly better yield. The only problem is that they are both 16e jobs so are unlikely to be processed soon.
Dave,

Not if you contact Greg (aka frmky) to queue it on 16e grid. Please let me know if you need my support.

Carlos
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-15, 21:03   #174
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

BFC16 Posts
Default

Amphoria - nice job on the ECM of C194_139_131 and subsequent test sieving. I'll post a request for polynomial over in the msieve subforum along with your result - maybe someone will find something slightly better within the expected range of Murphy e-score. As to running NFS on it, there's Greg (NFS@Home), Ryan Propper (he's done several C19x GNFS jobs recently), possibly others with big hardware (fivemack - any interest?). Or we defer it until another time.

Do you want to tackle C193_143_93? It's next on the list.


And an update - I am currently running ECM on C192_139_81. Progress is slow but as other jobs finish I then put that machine on this effort. Worst case I should have 10,000 curves completed by mid Dec.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-15, 23:25   #175
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

641910 Posts
Default

My new hardware is now installed, and can sieve a C170 inside a week, so a C192 probably within three months; though it seems slightly silly to run on second-hand four-year-old data-centre hardware when Ryan can run on rather larger quantities of rather newer data-centre hardware.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-22, 22:19   #176
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

BFC16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
My new hardware is now installed, and can sieve a C170 inside a week, so a C192 probably within three months; though it seems slightly silly to run on second-hand four-year-old data-centre hardware when Ryan can run on rather larger quantities of rather newer data-centre hardware.
Update: Ryan has taken up GNFS of C194_139_131. Currently in LA, factors expected by mid-December.

Fivemack - what's your status on ECM of C192_139_81? I've run about 5,000 curves so far @B1=3e8, no joy.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ready GNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 86 2020-03-07 16:23
SNFS targets which need more ECM XYYXF XYYXF Project 57 2017-07-04 19:15
Ready SNFS targets XYYXF XYYXF Project 25 2016-11-20 21:35
3,697+ (GNFS 220.9) pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 0 2014-12-24 19:13
3,766+ (GNFS 215.5) pinhodecarlos NFS@Home 34 2014-04-01 21:27

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:19.


Sat Jul 17 04:19:19 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 2:06, 1 user, load averages: 2.53, 2.76, 2.43

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.