What is a "suspect" result - Page 6

CuriousKit · 2015-08-05, 20:53

Thanks sdbardwick. I did figure that exponent was in the range for new machines, although I felt it was a little more urgent because it has conflicting results. Still, we'll find out soon.

endless mike · 2015-08-05, 22:36

Is this the thread to request a triple check? If so, could someone check 35475589? My double-check didn't match the original test, and it hasn't been reassigned to anyone yet. That yellow unverified is bugging me. I have another more recent in need of a triple check, but that one has been assigned already.

sdbardwick · 2015-08-06, 01:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by endless mike

Is this the thread to request a triple check? If so, could someone check 35475589? My double-check didn't match the original test, and it hasn't been reassigned to anyone yet. That yellow unverified is bugging me. I have another more recent in need of a triple check, but that one has been assigned already.

Ok, my SB needs something to do. Done in 55 40 hours.

sdbardwick · 2015-08-06, 13:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdbardwick

I threw M39070231 on a semi-reliable Haswell as a manual DC; result due in about 30 hours.

Finished with zero errors, but without matching other results. It would be great if someone else picked it up for a quick re-test, but I'll schedule it for a rerun it on a known-good Sandy Bridge box after endless mike's finishes. So in a week we'll (probably) know either way.

Mark Rose · 2015-08-06, 14:19

I'll do it.

CuriousKit · 2015-08-07, 02:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdbardwick

Finished with zero errors, but without matching other results. It would be great if someone else picked it up for a quick re-test, but I'll schedule it for a rerun it on a known-good Sandy Bridge box after endless mike's finishes. So in a week we'll (probably) know either way.

Oh man... three results that don't agree?! Now I have no clue what to think!

Batalov · 2015-08-07, 02:15

Someone should run it like so:
Test=FFT2=2M,35475589,72,2

kladner · 2015-08-07, 04:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuriousKit

Oh man... three results that don't agree?! Now I have no clue what to think!

There have been worse cases. With the number of tests that have been run, and the possibilities of over clocking, or just plain instability, some will be unlucky enough to pick up multiple bad results. This will get cleaned up soon enough, what with some of the seriously big iron some people here run.

sdbardwick · 2015-08-07, 16:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuriousKit

Oh man... three results that don't agree?! Now I have no clue what to think!

We'll need to wait for Mark for it to be official, but it looks like your result is good! My boring Haswell-E produced a zero-error result that matches your residue (at least as far as I can tell).

Batalov · 2015-08-07, 16:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by endless mike

Is this the thread to request a triple check? If so, could someone check 35475589? My double-check didn't match the original test, and it hasn't been reassigned to anyone yet. That yellow unverified is bugging me. I have another more recent in need of a triple check, but that one has been assigned already.

Triple-checked with FFT2=2M. Your result appears to be correct for this expo.

sdbardwick · 2015-08-07, 17:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by endless mike

Is this the thread to request a triple check? If so, could someone check 35475589? My double-check didn't match the original test, and it hasn't been reassigned to anyone yet. That yellow unverified is bugging me. I have another more recent in need of a triple check, but that one has been assigned already.

Finished and matched endless_mike's result.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!"	wildrabbitt	Miscellaneous Math	11	2015-03-06 08:17
mfaktX result: "found 1 factor for M"	swl551	GPU Computing	2	2012-12-20 15:20
Intermittent (?) "result not needed"	apsen	PrimeNet	4	2011-09-22 17:47
Can "Recent Result" list be longer?	ATH	PrimeNet	1	2011-07-08 14:48
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier?	nitai1999	Software	7	2004-08-26 18:12

2015-08-05, 20:53	#56
CuriousKit "J. Gareth Moreton" Feb 2015 Nomadic 2×3²×5 Posts	Thanks sdbardwick. I did figure that exponent was in the range for new machines, although I felt it was a little more urgent because it has conflicting results. Still, we'll find out soon.

2015-08-05, 22:36	#57
endless mike Jan 2004 Milwaukee, WI 2·3·23 Posts	Is this the thread to request a triple check? If so, could someone check 35475589? My double-check didn't match the original test, and it hasn't been reassigned to anyone yet. That yellow unverified is bugging me. I have another more recent in need of a triple check, but that one has been assigned already.

2015-08-06, 14:19	#60
Mark Rose "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 2×5×293 Posts	I'll do it.

2015-08-07, 02:15	#62
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 9497₁₀ Posts	Someone should run it like so: Test=FFT2=2M,35475589,72,2