mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-07-10, 15:54   #1068
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

26·53 Posts
Default C190_179743_47

It looks like C190_179743_47 could use a few more rels. 356M seems a little light for a 32-bit job. (Not that I have tried to build a matrix - just comparative to others.)
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-11, 13:18   #1069
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

191816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
It looks like C190_179743_47 could use a few more rels. 356M seems a little light for a 32-bit job. (Not that I have tried to build a matrix - just comparative to others.)
OK, I've stuck in another 10%
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-11, 13:19   #1070
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

1100000101002 Posts
Default 14e queue running dry

Can a moderator enqueue some more factorization jobs? There's four candidates listed in this thread.
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-11, 16:20   #1071
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23·11·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Can a moderator enqueue some more factorization jobs? There's four candidates listed in this thread.
OK, I've queued up all four.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-11, 18:06   #1072
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

7×292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
732541^47-1 (so 732541^48-732541) is I think too hard to be run sensibly with 15e - I'm seeing yields of 700 relations per 1kQ and times of nearly two CPU-seconds per relation on Ivy Bridge.
Is it worth considering this for 16e? It is one of the most wanted numbers for the odd perfect numbers project.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-12, 15:26   #1073
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

11001000110002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
Is it worth considering this for 16e? It is one of the most wanted numbers for the odd perfect numbers project.
Definitely worth considering, but I think you have to do that by private-message to frmky rather than by forum discussion (have some 16e trial-sieving numbers available) - he's the only person with access to the 16e queue.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-17, 03:40   #1074
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

26·53 Posts
Default

I believe this C191 from OPN will work as a 31-bit job.
Sieve on algebraic side.
Code:
n: 19947745549179466411123477180198292576669859696921960022012438887766114836113435875503117706076524895073601628013972733623159871306811064732550107339068794030080752263204318751998659462601577
# 4440731591^23-1, difficulty: 231.54, skewness: 40.54, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 1.9631e+18, est. time: 934.81 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
lss: 0
skew: 40.542
c6: 1
c0: -4440731591
Y1: -1
Y0: 388882228186185917376121079240510820961
m: 388882228186185917376121079240510820961
type: snfs
rlim: 200000000
alim: 200000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
type: snfs
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
Code:
  Q  Yield
 20M  7355
 60M  5582
100M  5628
150M  4315
200M  4317
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-24, 16:31   #1075
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

26×53 Posts
Default

C202 from the t550 file.
Code:
n: 6465390448837521394926324864370323783814800107980963012130724825548754963831603089899418992874702068777335644473069199635219327920458146680289639198885699531837039229760097808711981137156896747009755893
# 386855506153^19-1, SNFS-220, sieve on algebraic side
lss: 0
skew: 0.01027
c6: 386855506153
c0: -1
Y1: -1
Y0: 57895705139974944304896778147443577
rlim: 132000000
alim: 132000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
type: snfs
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
Code:
  Q  Yield
 20M 13130
 60M 10218
100M  9271
140M  9084
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-25, 14:56   #1076
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22·773 Posts
Default

C165_130_103 is ready for sieving on 14e. Many thanks to Max0526 for finding the polynomial.

Code:
n: 648146241913641179539709408678988102109949241330132355164017105217570355687924132667745695890188640048674250246030149457534565613775349574502641905762758667691825307
Y0: -68968130918178516861525368148175
Y1: 15478263206398516582361
c0: 1358340209127403916341216724804402220
c1: 140154060678905434970517485120092
c2: -195540925968055295222224235
c3: -146751885047497441487
c4: 39502031242530
c5: 4144800
skew: 2180878.51095
# lognorm 51.41, E 44.41, alpha -6.99 (proj -1.99), 5 real roots
# MurphyE=7.18364372e-13
rlim: 130000000
alim: 130000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

Test sieving on the -a side with Q in blocks of 10,000
Code:
 Q    yield
20M   25758
50M   24043
80M   24361
130M  24624
Suggesting a sieving range of 20M-125M for Q

Last fiddled with by swellman on 2017-07-25 at 14:57
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-25, 16:07   #1077
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

65008 Posts
Default

C165 from the t550 file.
Sieve on algebraic side.
Code:
n: 206624234787895127079635689160853271138184247037852040138807151313105472767301151006671925566833211427212893401789666545317553145123303517053270920352192996234823109
# 2745256771^23-1, difficulty: 226.53, skewness: 37.42, alpha: 0.00
# cost: 1.31139e+18, est. time: 624.47 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
lss: 0
skew: 37.419
c6: 1
c0: -2745256771
Y1: -1
Y0: 56797848571005889396690475603943366481
m: 56797848571005889396690475603943366481
type: snfs
rlim: 132000000
alim: 132000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
type: snfs
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
Code:
  Q  Yield
 20M 11586
 60M 10871
100M  9374
140M  8186
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-25, 20:54   #1078
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23·11·73 Posts
Default

Queued up those three
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
System management notes kriesel kriesel 7 2020-10-21 18:52
Improving the queue management. debrouxl NFS@Home 10 2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management ewmayer Software 3 2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!) jasong jasong 35 2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings PrimeCroat Hardware 3 2004-02-17 19:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:27.


Fri Aug 6 22:27:00 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:56, 1 user, load averages: 2.97, 3.27, 3.20

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.