![]() |
|
|
#1035 |
|
Jun 2012
11·281 Posts |
C207_127_103 and C206_129_95 are ready for NFS. Sieve using 14e.
Code:
n: 381704906927879421312056510857538053155858776390310032847439225786233948892834352085403252680665987643131289809797419808316399164669416257559643814360462067141085658599143558692095693670328817277329724173799 # 127^103+103^127, difficulty: 257.64, anorm: 2.29e+038, rnorm: 1.83e+048 # scaled difficulty: 259.29, suggest sieving rational side # size = 5.559e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 7.870e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 257 skew: 1.0355 c6: 103 c0: 127 Y1: -581652040856250348581103942808504447 Y0: 1860294571709496226110032706809177658295303 rlim: 240000000 alim: 240000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 Test sieving with Q in blocks of 5000 Code:
Q=20M total yield: 8232, q=20005003 (0.76654 sec/rel) Q=100M total yield: 6732, q=100005001 (1.00778 sec/rel) Q=200M total yield: 5528, q=200005007 (1.40776 sec/rel) Q=300M total yield: 5141, q=300005039 (1.57456 sec/rel) Code:
n: 82739763050618261459944062822029481086261568048108928042758674940753725990266316561602510605437377120986715580704445181098385778578492897916317459273643266219727394445877980087458027748876345097839851375273 # 129^95+95^129, difficulty: 255.13, anorm: 2.10e+040, rnorm: -1.59e+048 # scaled difficulty: 256.44, suggest sieving rational side # size = 4.515e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 6.806e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 255 skew: 21.9092 c6: 1 c0: 110601375 Y1: -340561626288115122639539918422698974609375 Y0: 5880785850256519209198206471505921 rlim: 240000000 alim: 240000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 Test sieving with Q in blocks of 5000 Code:
Q=20M total yield: 8734, q=20005003 (0.72242 sec/rel) Q=100M total yield: 7096, q=100005001 (0.96160 sec/rel) Q=200M total yield: 6103, q=200005007 (1.28523 sec/rel) Q=300M total yield: 5248, q=300005039 (1.54877 sec/rel) |
|
|
|
|
|
#1036 |
|
I moo ablest echo power!
May 2013
13×137 Posts |
The C207 has been fully ECM'd and (thanks to the users of this forum) has been extensively searched for an appropriate polynomial.
There were two polynomials that test-sieved fairly closely (within ~3-5%) when tested with YAFU. I ran my own test-sieving on each for a range of parameters (rational and algebraic sides, 3LPs vs 2LPs, etc) and minimized the time per relation. All test sieving was done with the 16e GGNFS siever. I'm fairly certain this will need to be in the 16e queue, and I think it will require some heavyweight computing power for the linear algebra, which I am not able to provide. It would be greatly appreciated if this number could be queued. Full details plus polynomial follows: C207: Code:
183724913753361567376492453926230323715345031792001208551707422272237266349933302881515963689094609592709968359761386456940894165548045328984901031969851838708505435691913321760214712695688550560374318369687 Code:
n: 183724913753361567376492453926230323715345031792001208551707422272237266349933302881515963689094609592709968359761386456940894165548045328984901031969851838708505435691913321760214712695688550560374318369687 # norm 2.865842e-020 alpha -7.774942 e 1.627e-015 rroots 3 skew: 340123234.89 c0: 571991564598637896614710101239020638310733930025 c1: 167700052788587220002691890175305892882498 c2: 6476627046873628489030255421467789 c3: -13678387964207629928614248 c4: 17897969236909044 c5: 22320144 Y0: 6068679638793281991245086507839408878726 Y1: -39500688790939641031 type: gnfs rlim: 800000000 alim: 800000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 33 mfbr: 64 mfba: 96 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 4.6 Code:
22A: total yield: 248, q=25001029 (6.40776 sec/rel) 22R: total yield: 309, q=25001029 (6.44973 sec/rel) 32A: total yield: 508, q=25001029 (3.22992 sec/rel) 32A_LPBA33: total yield: 660, q=25001029 (2.48489 sec/rel) 32A_LPBA33_alambda4.6: total yield: 881, q=25001029 (2.14951 sec/rel) Code:
25M: total yield: 881, q=25001029 (2.14951 sec/rel) 50M: total yield: 1388, q=50001037 (2.65706 sec/rel) 100M: total yield: 1215, q=100001029 (2.56781 sec/rel) 200M: total yield: 1621, q=200001001 (2.86097 sec/rel) 300M: total yield: 1126, q=300001001 (3.06091 sec/rel) 400M: total yield: 1061, q=400001009 (3.33016 sec/rel) 500M: total yield: 1413, q=500001001 (3.48125 sec/rel) 600M: total yield: 1121, q=600001021 (3.78163 sec/rel) 700M: total yield: 1049, q=700001011 (3.87128 sec/rel) 800M: total yield: 1086, q=800001071 (4.23842 sec/rel) I hope this is all sufficient for consideration. If there's anything I missed and should include, please let me know. Thanks again to everyone who helped with both the polynomial search and advised on how best to go about testing parameters and test-sieving. Last fiddled with by wombatman on 2017-05-06 at 20:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1037 |
|
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto
19×47 Posts |
@wombatman
Thank you for pulling all the test-sieving through! The polyselect was another example of a productive collaboration of Msieve & CADO. We should learn to always use them together, both are available, and projects are not getting any easier either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1038 |
|
Jun 2012
11×281 Posts |
C205_125_117 and C208_138_73 are ready for NFS. Sieve using 14e.
Code:
n: 1281391649236418351602951600256058919882810571399099834538395547428107884746687254512839657624121302691713820093300981087247076423566422509243255544515194093681083657095913190158948865741118224336595703241 # 125^117+117^125, difficulty: 260.59, anorm: 2.42e+038, rnorm: 1.21e+049 # scaled difficulty: 262.37, suggest sieving rational side # size = 4.926e-013, alpha = 0.000, combined = 7.048e-014, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 260 skew: 4.9452 c6: 1 c0: 14625 Y1: -34694469519536141888238489627838134765625 Y0: 27033551021470087806679878288841875415489317 rlim: 260000000 alim: 260000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 Code:
Q=20M total yield: 8416, q=20005003 (0.78020 sec/rel) Q=100M total yield: 7246, q=100005001 (0.97638 sec/rel) Q=200M total yield: 6057, q=200005007 (1.33968 sec/rel) Q=300M total yield: 5407, q=300005039 (1.60261 sec/rel) Code:
n: 9682172549759977817280440817745192373346520333807918948384967474684409321103942149950106448794418488886498766692493973661509359455402281867346856560850545412691940736896899559425920586209802807009228826852567 # 138^73+73^138, difficulty: 257.14, anorm: 2.35e+037, rnorm: 4.77e+048 # scaled difficulty: 259.02, suggest sieving rational side # size = 1.035e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.202e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 257 skew: 2.2732 c6: 1 c0: 138 Y1: -47703367363695867545849856 Y0: 7184983626352716099297100617536359330111417 rlim: 240000000 alim: 240000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 Code:
Q=20M total yield: 11104, q=20005003 (0.48071 sec/rel) Q=100M total yield: 9535, q=100005001 (0.60287 sec/rel) Q=200M total yield: 8031, q=200005007 (0.82748 sec/rel) Q=300M total yield: 7105, q=300005039 (0.97495 sec/rel) Last fiddled with by swellman on 2017-05-08 at 20:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1039 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
2,593 Posts |
Please queue C165 from 11040:i10029. Here is the fastest poly:
Code:
n: 548053161872286094263546390942532925280484495878287628018996658359830769025595729605632079717852442811109714651767256348336257841788345910368127498252314702339291049 # norm 4.589867e-16 alpha -6.706725 e 6.261e-13 rroots 5 skew: 9216896.39 c0: 8592717878299972283339126425141474811280 c1: 3041053898941390683885715314090252 c2: -740005961644725299986648110 c3: -208386829472386131734 c4: 12368070595697 c5: 229680 Y0: -75082701001833231044422797434639 Y1: 228408202789936501 type: gnfs rlim: 134217727 alim: 134217727 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1040 |
|
Jun 2012
11·281 Posts |
C211_125_112 and C212_142_108 are ready for NFS. Sieve using 14e.
Note the first poly (C211_125_112) is best sieved on the -a side. Code:
n: 1689507061605102889217543282905214634102582281131872983829885401870656891759881658183519703945629754132695708201544163632070863778419050545756623099343361881219961368278598736405423549981323295341551169130715323 # 125^112+112^125, difficulty: 258.50, anorm: 1.06e+037, rnorm: 5.15e+048 # scaled difficulty: 260.45, suggest sieving algebraic side # size = 9.957e-013, alpha = 1.534, combined = 1.168e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 258 skew: 1.0978 c6: 4 c0: 7 Y1: -1387778780781445675529539585113525390625 Y0: 5401924132233963086793068268357579079417856 rlim: 240000000 alim: 240000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 Test sieving with Q in blocks of 5000 Code:
Q=20M total yield: 11928, q=20005003 (0.52655 sec/rel) Q=100M total yield: 8366, q=100005001 (0.74236 sec/rel) Q=200M total yield: 8283, q=200005007 (1.08382 sec/rel) Q=300M total yield: 6086, q=300005039 (1.26756 sec/rel) Code:
n: 91126004014867590868461238416818426882727371388191556422498253862882787328598694224042703997985409713456644204584975765412626909572032335628860161594110434879526087880364839445510693095057648147229404318461288893 # 142^108+108^142, difficulty: 259.35, anorm: 8.00e+036, rnorm: 6.40e+048 # scaled difficulty: 261.33, suggest sieving rational side # size = 1.028e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 1.191e-013, rroots = 0 type: snfs size: 259 skew: 1.5874 c6: 1 c0: 16 Y1: -2102085018129621311776010144838961 Y0: 8063228273061253034007789191829366377545728 rlim: 240000000 alim: 240000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 2.8 Test sieving with Q in blocks of 5000 Code:
Q=20M total yield: 10829, q=20005003 (0.47526 sec/rel) Q=100M total yield: 9337, q=100005001 (0.59239 sec/rel) Q=200M total yield: 7754, q=200005007 (0.82499 sec/rel) Q=300M total yield: 7173, q=300005039 (0.93322 sec/rel) I did attempt to sieve this second composite using c6=4, c0=1 but it would not sieve. Not sure if this is due to my setup, a siever bug or number theory in general. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1041 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
11×443 Posts |
13*2^798-1:
Code:
# 13*2^798-1 difficulty: 241 n: 346247349907241163585308458757929567124659986167606695746616522331616952376380451008019260360292079973456363032432287677367375873009775610170148915959622326863279523899867843130802995834514334508157 m: 10889035741470030830827987437816582766592 type: snfs skew: 0.70 c6: 13 c0: -1 rlim: 110000000 alim: 110000000 lpbr: 32 lpba: 32 mfbr: 64 mfba: 64 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 Q of 20M to 110M should be sufficient for ~350M raw relations. I'd like to do the post-processing when it's ready. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1042 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
2×3×5×113 Posts |
OPN (C197) from the t600 file which survived a full t55.
Code:
n: 76168789033078306528545510523783851836825949741968982499279727789871412694249124010078841499570187735718916285158940989141405074631832098698287693088761942446767032814304058444846489745122492050123 # 128341^47-1, difficulty: 245.20, skewness: 7.10, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 5.74422e+18, est. time: 2735.34 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 7.102 c6: 1 c0: -128341 Y1: -1 Y0: 73607717520239639878892572595537274407521 m: 73607717520239639878892572595537274407521 type: snfs rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 Code:
Q Yield 20M 10076 60M 7768 100M 7364 140M 6359 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1043 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
Queued C197_128341_47
Queued 13_2_798m Queued C211_125_112 Queued C212_142_108 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1044 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
2·3·5·113 Posts |
After reviewing this post it appears we may be able to squeeze the number in as a 30 LPB job.
Code:
n: 3582123724009125350979135532253668176917146315309069102903598732280603715909936623363796377970580002623282837233544467878001808051279400221966150804199215087404769081158554191159143409953966039 # 25125200742702138527^13-1, difficulty: 232.80, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 3.10 # cost: 2.17123e+18, est. time: 1033.92 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 1.000 c6: 1 c5: 1 c4: -5 c3: -4 c2: 6 c1: 3 c0: -1 Y1: -25125200742702138527 Y0: 631275712361080093443627372579097729730 m: 2942309812454780857174959580625797121082650591780520548459155615893205344204950445727368887008237009235463040328040082883725470745346026159304591613666306253853561846670793772820592220799691604 type: snfs rlim: 67000000 alim: 67000000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 Code:
Q Yield 20M 9742 60M 7226 100M 6251 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1045 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
A2116 Posts |
Much better poly for C165 from 11040:i10029 (thx to Max).
Code:
n: 548053161872286094263546390942532925280484495878287628018996658359830769025595729605632079717852442811109714651767256348336257841788345910368127498252314702339291049 Y0: -66293314740471378847093879949751 Y1: 1631428933119792335581 c0: -6502334456108684229848773957534620127960 c1: 4137968742928655885127027704264398 c2: 1330621088475088099747541529 c3: -199123773602778674989 c4: -30080739151610 c5: 856800 skew: 7541903.96641 # lognorm 52.93, E 44.95, alpha -7.98 (proj -2.42), 5 real roots # MurphyE = 7.53624407e-13 type: gnfs rlim: 134217727 alim: 134217727 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| System management notes | kriesel | kriesel | 7 | 2020-10-21 18:52 |
| Improving the queue management. | debrouxl | NFS@Home | 10 | 2018-05-06 21:05 |
| Script-based Primenet assignment management | ewmayer | Software | 3 | 2017-05-25 04:02 |
| Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!) | jasong | jasong | 35 | 2016-12-11 00:57 |
| Power Management settings | PrimeCroat | Hardware | 3 | 2004-02-17 19:11 |