Fast Breeding (guru management) - Page 58

fivemack · 2016-07-09, 10:54

I've queued unconnected's number on 14e

pinhodecarlos · 2016-07-10, 11:15

Can I advise to triple the unsent wus for 14e and 15e applications. Thank you.

fivemack · 2016-07-10, 16:09

Hello Carlos,

Please could you arrange to have access to the job submission pages, rather than badgering those of us with access; it takes about a minute and a half to submit one job with the current infrastructure, and I really have better things to do on a warm Sunday afternoon than hitting ^C and ^V and waiting for the job-submission page to reload. I have queued up the top four items from HCN_polys.txt.

Please tell your acquaintances with the desire to throw cycles at randomly-chosen projects that, until we have significantly better automation, they are not doing the 14e and 15e slices of NFS@home a favour by choosing it for their cycles; stick to 16e where the jobs are more granular, or turn off the surplus computers and stop pumping CO2 into my atmosphere.

pinhodecarlos · 2016-07-10, 17:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by fivemack

Hello Carlos,

Please could you arrange to have access to the job submission pages, rather than badgering those of us with access; it takes about a minute and a half to submit one job with the current infrastructure, and I really have better things to do on a warm Sunday afternoon than hitting ^C and ^V and waiting for the job-submission page to reload. I have queued up the top four items from HCN_polys.txt.

Please tell your acquaintances with the desire to throw cycles at randomly-chosen projects that, until we have significantly better automation, they are not doing the 14e and 15e slices of NFS@home a favour by choosing it for their cycles; stick to 16e where the jobs are more granular, or turn off the surplus computers and stop pumping CO2 into my atmosphere.

Did ask Greg a few weeks ago access to it but no reply from him on this matter.
With regards to your second paragraph I just regret it and feel sorry and apologise if I've been pushing you guys on feeding the grid.
From now on all queries received worldwide (different forums) about the project wus availability, etc, will be forward here for answer. Nothing better to have the manager of the 14e and 15e NFS management website to reply to them instead of an intermediate guy like myself.

swellman · 2016-07-12, 18:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by swellman

RichD found a poly for this GNFS job. It has survived ECM to t55.

Code:

# C178_133_71
N: 3841555638609121585955208849852215958265892685129760666527325956988824434099468571864347054880461407129910718661394754868659901229138374032476680504468397772382909852918017232799
#  expecting poly E from 1.07e-13 to > 1.24e-13
R0: -46515930102250406625446814410322748
R1: 43316651465326921
A0: 1849279295652687185857424396955381160117649451
A1: 50719340386210033066265064569927805197
A2: -906428031886864898595060751181
A3: -13675167978469070379277
A4: 24728155385850
A5: 17640
# skew 206008890.45, size 2.494e-17, alpha -8.934, combined = 1.223e-13 rroots = 5

Not sure if this is best sieved by 14e or 15e.

Bump for 15e queue, at the risk of pouring more gas on the fire...

fivemack · 2016-07-12, 20:40

Queued on 15e

swellman · 2016-07-13, 00:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by fivemack

Queued on 15e

Thank you fivemack.

Here is a list of some additional xyyx candidates for 14e, all with t50 and a bit of t55 on them. ECM misses unlikely but no guarantees, just more wood on the pile in case you need it. Polys attached, all 31-bit jobs with r/alim=134e6, i.e. ~2^(lpb-4).

Please note C220_123_80 is best sieved on the -a side. Thanks.

* C220_123_80
* C218_127_70
* C231_134_90
* C179_130_126
* C218_122_85
* C185_127_71
C216_148_124
C202_123_83
C226_129_68
C211_137_53
C211_148_116
C207_148_112
C205_134_96
C177_124_81
* C175_133_61 - 0.3t55 run

fivemack: added stars to ones that have been queued. Enqueuing is tiresomely manual.

jyb · 2016-07-13, 17:20

C235_143_48 in the 14e queue appears to be having some trouble with sieving. I believe this is because the .poly file doesn't have a skew value set. Can somebody fix that?

Thanks.

fivemack: Thanks for diagnosis; fixed. Looks like I deleted the skew line while inserting the lss:0 line for algebraic-side sieving. Foolish fivemack.

jyb · 2016-07-13, 18:35

I'm reposting the file containing polynomials for the HCN numbers that are ready for sieving, with the following two changes:

1) I've removed the numbers which are already factored or reserved.
2) I've sorted it by SNFS difficulty, which is probably more useful.

There are 57 composites in the file.

If folks would prefer that this information be conveyed in a different form, let me know what would work better.

fivemack · 2016-07-14, 07:23

In an ideal world I would like a zip-or-something with one file per number, so that I can do trial sieving completely automatically with a very small shell script and have more reasonable bounds ready when the numbers go onto the queue. But splitting a file into smaller files is not a challenging perl exercise, so I'm happy to do that myself.

jyb · 2016-07-20, 22:24

Can we get some more work units added for some of the numbers in the 14e queue? The following are all a little low in relations, and I can start LA on some as soon as they're a bit more sieved. Those with a question mark are close and could probably build a matrix, but could still profit from some more sieving.

8-3_263
5+3_344
7+2_283
11+3_232
C175_133_61?
C220_123_80
12+5,226?

Thanks!

fivemack Done 21/7 1140

2016-07-10, 16:09	#630
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2³×11×73 Posts	Hello Carlos, Please could you arrange to have access to the job submission pages, rather than badgering those of us with access; it takes about a minute and a half to submit one job with the current infrastructure, and I really have better things to do on a warm Sunday afternoon than hitting ^C and ^V and waiting for the job-submission page to reload. I have queued up the top four items from HCN_polys.txt. Please tell your acquaintances with the desire to throw cycles at randomly-chosen projects that, until we have significantly better automation, they are not doing the 14e and 15e slices of NFS@home a favour by choosing it for their cycles; stick to 16e where the jobs are more granular, or turn off the surplus computers and stop pumping CO2 into my atmosphere. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-07-10 at 16:10

2016-07-13, 17:20	#635
jyb Aug 2005 Seattle, WA 11011100110₂ Posts	C235_143_48 in trouble C235_143_48 in the 14e queue appears to be having some trouble with sieving. I believe this is because the .poly file doesn't have a skew value set. Can somebody fix that? Thanks. fivemack: Thanks for diagnosis; fixed. Looks like I deleted the skew line while inserting the lss:0 line for algebraic-side sieving. Foolish fivemack. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-07-14 at 07:21

2016-07-20, 22:24	#638
jyb Aug 2005 Seattle, WA 2·883 Posts	Can we get some more work units added for some of the numbers in the 14e queue? The following are all a little low in relations, and I can start LA on some as soon as they're a bit more sieved. Those with a question mark are close and could probably build a matrix, but could still profit from some more sieving. 8-3_263 5+3_344 7+2_283 11+3_232 C175_133_61? C220_123_80 12+5,226? Thanks! fivemack Done 21/7 1140 Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-07-21 at 10:38

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
System management notes	kriesel	kriesel	7	2020-10-21 18:52
Improving the queue management.	debrouxl	NFS@Home	10	2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management	ewmayer	Software	3	2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!)	jasong	jasong	35	2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings	PrimeCroat	Hardware	3	2004-02-17 19:11

2016-07-09, 10:54	#628
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 6424₁₀ Posts	I've queued unconnected's number on 14e

2016-07-10, 11:15	#629
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 3×17×97 Posts	Can I advise to triple the unsent wus for 14e and 15e applications. Thank you.

2016-07-12, 20:40	#633
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2³·11·73 Posts	Queued on 15e

2016-07-14, 07:23	#637
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 6424₁₀ Posts	In an ideal world I would like a zip-or-something with one file per number, so that I can do trial sieving completely automatically with a very small shell script and have more reasonable bounds ready when the numbers go onto the queue. But splitting a file into smaller files is not a challenging perl exercise, so I'm happy to do that myself.