Fast Breeding (guru management) - Page 52

jyb · 2016-05-25, 23:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by debrouxl

Jon: yup, it would be great if you could generate polys for the 4 last of these 6 numbers.

Done and attached.

jyb · 2016-05-27, 16:14

The 14e and 15e queues are both empty. Who has the ability to fill them?

pinhodecarlos · 2016-05-27, 17:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyb

The 14e and 15e queues are both empty. Who has the ability to fill them?

14e: Lionel, Tom, Paul, Greg
15e: Lionel, Tom, Greg

debrouxl · 2016-05-27, 20:08

The current issue is transient, but it further highlights the dire need for greater automation of the process...
Greg is going to provide me the files for the management infrastructure soon, so that I can work on it; but he's insanely busy at the moment.

debrouxl · 2016-05-29, 09:32

I have started working on the procedure to unify the two databases behind the 14e and 15e queue management, and improving the unified database, so that a unified management interface can be made out of the currently duplicated ones.
Some tasks can be done through MySQL functions (I'm learning a bit in the process), which is what I did so far, while others are best left to PHP.
I have imported the '2012 RSALS code and the '2016 NFS@Home code into a private Github repository, and my changes on top of that. A friend and team-mate from the TI community will try to spend some time on the code to help me

wblipp · 2016-05-30, 23:30

SNFS polynomial for this one is interesting

P223+1 = 2 * C223

P223 = (26010319^31-1)/26010318

26010319 = (612067^3-1)/(612066*3*4801)

I think the best polynomial is
26010319*x^6+26010317 with x=26010319^5

But perhaps some clever person will find something better.

Dubslow · 2016-05-31, 00:04

Presumably you mean P223+1=2*C223...?

wblipp · 2016-05-31, 02:35

Some quartics that are ready, including the penalty for quartics.

181^115-1
3237350394808285103075641617594465564146206546711^5-1
3633300011821322527883441762063547117079391973569^5-1
18864198964623859882837445679850969284402949066171^5-1
24772285175707806384099574440402334706455060939751^5-1
2164375781978715114102841584382563299103035038465117^5-1
37424900799714233724027045150234142768618867083668617^5-1
1435130102620557966393278537760156017252441420078670131^5-1

and a 15e sized sextic
70841^53-1

Dubslow · 2016-05-31, 02:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by wblipp

SNFS polynomial for this one is interesting

P223+1 = 2 * C233

P223 = (26010319^31-1)/26010318

26010319 = (612067^3-1)/(612066*3*4801)

I think the best polynomial is
26010319*x^6+26010317 with x=26010319^5

But perhaps some clever person will find something better.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

Presumably you mean P223+1=2*C223...?

Still says C233

fivemack · 2016-05-31, 16:12

Trial-sieving 70841^53-1 and pushed to 15e

debrouxl · 2016-05-31, 18:51

C188_132_125 has terrible yield: after sieving most of the 20M-120M range, the recommended ending Q is currently 1487M, which is way too high.
32-bit LPs are usually alright for 15e on a number of that size, but qlim = alim = 26800000 is an order of magnitude too low. I failed to detect that when pasting the ready-made polynomial. I guess we should terminate sieving for that number, and create a new entry with the fixed polynomial ?

2016-05-30, 23:30	#567
wblipp "William" May 2003 New Haven 2·7·13² Posts	SNFS polynomial for this one is interesting P223+1 = 2 * C223 P223 = (26010319^31-1)/26010318 26010319 = (612067^3-1)/(61206634801) I think the best polynomial is 26010319x^6+26010317 with x=26010319^5 But perhaps some clever person will find something better. Last fiddled with by wblipp on 2016-05-31 at 03:28 Reason: fix P223 per next post; rinse, repeat*

2016-05-31, 16:12	#571
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2³·11·73 Posts	Trial-sieving 70841^53-1 and pushed to 15e Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-05-31 at 16:37

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
System management notes	kriesel	kriesel	7	2020-10-21 18:52
Improving the queue management.	debrouxl	NFS@Home	10	2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management	ewmayer	Software	3	2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!)	jasong	jasong	35	2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings	PrimeCroat	Hardware	3	2004-02-17 19:11

2016-05-27, 16:14	#563
jyb Aug 2005 Seattle, WA 3·19·31 Posts	The 14e and 15e queues are both empty. Who has the ability to fill them?

2016-05-27, 20:08	#565
debrouxl Sep 2009 1721₈ Posts	The current issue is transient, but it further highlights the dire need for greater automation of the process... Greg is going to provide me the files for the management infrastructure soon, so that I can work on it; but he's insanely busy at the moment.

2016-05-29, 09:32	#566
debrouxl Sep 2009 1111010001₂ Posts	I have started working on the procedure to unify the two databases behind the 14e and 15e queue management, and improving the unified database, so that a unified management interface can be made out of the currently duplicated ones. Some tasks can be done through MySQL functions (I'm learning a bit in the process), which is what I did so far, while others are best left to PHP. I have imported the '2012 RSALS code and the '2016 NFS@Home code into a private Github repository, and my changes on top of that. A friend and team-mate from the TI community will try to spend some time on the code to help me

2016-05-31, 00:04	#568
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3×29×83 Posts	Presumably you mean P223+1=2*C223...?

2016-05-31, 02:35	#569
wblipp "William" May 2003 New Haven 2×7×13² Posts	Some quartics that are ready, including the penalty for quartics. 181^115-1 3237350394808285103075641617594465564146206546711^5-1 3633300011821322527883441762063547117079391973569^5-1 18864198964623859882837445679850969284402949066171^5-1 24772285175707806384099574440402334706455060939751^5-1 2164375781978715114102841584382563299103035038465117^5-1 37424900799714233724027045150234142768618867083668617^5-1 1435130102620557966393278537760156017252441420078670131^5-1 and a 15e sized sextic 70841^53-1

2016-05-31, 18:51	#572
debrouxl Sep 2009 977 Posts	C188_132_125 has terrible yield: after sieving most of the 20M-120M range, the recommended ending Q is currently 1487M, which is way too high. 32-bit LPs are usually alright for 15e on a number of that size, but qlim = alim = 26800000 is an order of magnitude too low. I failed to detect that when pasting the ready-made polynomial. I guess we should terminate sieving for that number, and create a new entry with the fixed polynomial ?