![]() |
|
|
#2223 | |
|
Nov 2003
1D2416 Posts |
Quote:
2,1084+ seems to be nearing completion. Perhaps machines that had been working on it have switched over to 14e and 15f before the next large one starts up?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2225 |
|
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
176710 Posts |
QUEUED AS 9p2_526L
SNFS-252.22 C211 HCN (9+2,526L), ECM to t55. For 14e. Code:
n: 2862405985839249992864638786796591267731903814772936815145715155629809347291002103739094665175790790188633215426432211769927192695318099412501354570581845795585345382078360792475450875794434267424461225068381877 skew: 1.284898 c6: 2 c3: -6 c0: 9 Y1: 17592186044416 Y0: -969773729787523602876821942164080815560161 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 93 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.6 alambda: 2.6 Code:
Q Yield --- ----- 20M 4622 60M 2998 100M 2662 140M 2145 180M 1748 220M 1796 260M 1945 300M 1588 Last fiddled with by swellman on 2019-11-09 at 12:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2226 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
26×53 Posts |
QUEUED AS 137__493_5m1
C182 from the OPN t800 file. Code:
[ a.k.a. Phi_5(Phi_3(Phi_7(Phi_2(Phi_3(Phi_13(31)/42407/7908811))/3/13/31/2647/6228362269)/p28)/3/151/7057)/211/281/1091/11785661 ] Code:
n: 46632623738981767397580964656930474343860281279669741592436553838373411668178336559698082305210493458976623137050829617941463113585747006170889454715811548766152228608627570699753761 # 13731384572277870262862115052207190895929696457493^5-1, difficulty: 196.55, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45 # cost: 1.04269e+17, est. time: 49.65 GHz days (not accurate yet!) skew: 1.000 c4: 1 c3: 1 c2: 1 c1: 1 c0: 1 Y1: -1 Y0: 13731384572277870262862115052207190895929696457493 type: snfs rlim: 16700000 alim: 16700000 lpbr: 29 lpba: 29 mfbr: 57 mfba: 57 rlambda: 2.5 alambda: 2.5 Code:
Q Yield 10M 20180 20M 23048 26M 22245 Last fiddled with by swellman on 2019-11-09 at 18:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2227 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
487410 Posts |
QUEUED AS 13_2_892m
13_2_892m is ready for the 15e queue. Thanks for PhilF for ~1.8t55 ecm work! Code:
n: 18506805396968135611155184891404406020831889021055758328923431924399638720432241766053234118351869077918037177534464815730861966812520562472496745230825092848732924799837750268894252467544668175171 skew: 1.067 type: snfs c0: -4 c6: 13 Y0: -713623846352979940529142984724747568191373312 Y1: 1 lpbr: 32 lpba: 33 mfbr: 90 mfba: 64 alambda: 2.7 rlambda: 3.7 alim: 134000000 rlim: 100000000 Q from 10-240M is sufficient for ~590M raw relations on this 32/33 hybrid: Code:
q-ranges of 500 were tested, on -r side #Q=20M 2730 rels, 0.134 sec/rel #Q=40M 1772 rels, 0.173 sec/rel #Q=60M 1664 rels, 0.189 sec/rel #Q=100M 1390 rels, 0.218 sec/rel #Q=120M 1352 rels, 0.230 sec/rel #Q=140M 1413 rels, 0.234 sec/rel #Q=160M 1194 rels, 0.259 sec/rel #Q=180M 827 rels, 0.249 sec/rel #Q=200M 1379 rels, 0.254 sec/rel #Q=220M 793 rels, 0.304 sec/rel #Q=240M 995 rels, 0.282 sec/rel Last fiddled with by swellman on 2019-11-10 at 22:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2228 | |
|
Nov 2003
164448 Posts |
Quote:
of some kind in the server with respect to the 16e queue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2229 | |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
114128 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2230 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2231 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
339210 Posts |
I wonder why the yield on this number is half from my testing. I just realized I used 15e during test sieving. I should have realized something was up because the relations came so quickly for this size number. Probably need to go to at least Q=40M, or more.
Someone kicked Q up to 40M, but I’ve kicked it again to 45M. Last fiddled with by swellman on 2019-11-13 at 21:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2232 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
26·53 Posts |
QUEUED AS 48873043253_19m1
C182 from the OPN file t800. This polynomial is subject to a higher dup rate. Sieve on the algebraic side. Code:
n: 21032086980121377679363755274291979093380197167530330355863708508619912381349488259039892515286976890302601959284324429264573109070491968253271193557575850712811682664940728122357621 # 48873043253^19-1, difficulty: 203.09, skewness: 0.02, alpha: 0.00 # cost: 1.84607e+17, est. time: 87.91 GHz days (not accurate yet!) lss: 0 skew: 0.017 c6: 48873043253 c0: -1 Y1: -1 Y0: 116736897853362667044056235355277 type: snfs rlim: 33500000 alim: 33500000 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 Code:
Q Yield 10M 19058 20M 13849 50M 10687 72M 11550 Last fiddled with by swellman on 2019-11-14 at 21:31 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2233 |
|
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
3·19·31 Posts |
QUEUED AS 9p2_526M
SNFS-252.22 C242 HCN (9+2,526M), ECM to t55. For 14e. Code:
n: 12032116844014122594098682378309047955871124201346307891284003101533550125444507074466786347940812165499085947935912518083732859221730926558921343364999169270804586923287214952868221464381212455977361039742570328400227549615531761466645375297 skew: 1.284898 c6: 2 c3: 6 c0: 9 Y1: 17592186044416 Y0: -969773729787523602876821942164080815560161 rlim: 134000000 alim: 134000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 93 mfba: 62 rlambda: 3.6 alambda: 2.6 Code:
Q Yield --- ----- 20M 4475 60M 3072 100M 2589 140M 2092 180M 1796 220M 1869 260M 1933 300M 1740 Last fiddled with by swellman on 2019-11-14 at 21:34 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| System management notes | kriesel | kriesel | 7 | 2020-10-21 18:52 |
| Improving the queue management. | debrouxl | NFS@Home | 10 | 2018-05-06 21:05 |
| Script-based Primenet assignment management | ewmayer | Software | 3 | 2017-05-25 04:02 |
| Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!) | jasong | jasong | 35 | 2016-12-11 00:57 |
| Power Management settings | PrimeCroat | Hardware | 3 | 2004-02-17 19:11 |