Fast Breeding (guru management) - Page 18

swellman · 2015-08-26, 18:23

Bump

Quote:

Originally Posted by swellman

For 15e, how about the five highest SNFS remaining for Homogenous Cunningham numbers? They are just over SNFS difficulty 250, the polys are quickly discerned and it's a long time project. They've been ECM'd for years, though I don't know exactly to what level for these particular five. Just a suggestion.

Number SNFS
5^359+2^359 250.9
5^359+3^359 250.9
5^359+4^359 250.9
7^298+3^298 251.8
7^298+2^298 251.8

Are these viable candidates for 15e? Sufficient ECM run?

I realize there is a discussion/debate on the other thread about inserting some Homogeneous Cunninghams into queue but I believe it is limited to 14e.

pinhodecarlos · 2015-08-27, 05:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by swellman

I realize there is a discussion/debate on the other thread about inserting some Homogeneous Cunninghams into queue but I believe it is limited to 14e.

About this maybe hurry up....just an advise.

debrouxl · 2015-08-27, 06:39

Yeah, Homogeneous Cunninghams are one of the sources of numbers we tap once in a while, under the usual guidelines ( http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=167 ).
But now that we've queued a couple dozen numbers, there will be some latency for the three XYYXF numbers suggested by Sean, some yet unreserved Homogeneous Cunninghams, or anything else.

pinhodecarlos · 2015-08-27, 08:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by debrouxl

Yeah, Homogeneous Cunninghams are one of the sources of numbers we tap once in a while, under the usual guidelines ( http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=167 ).
But now that we've queued a couple dozen numbers, there will be some latency for the three XYYXF numbers suggested by Sean, some yet unreserved Homogeneous Cunninghams, or anything else.

Just please be aware of a boom on the 14e crunching side that might happen during the challenge.

debrouxl · 2015-08-27, 08:37

Yes, the bunkering has already started, and creates some latency (overly long tail) on 6301_61_minus1.

pinhodecarlos · 2015-08-27, 08:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by debrouxl

Yes, the bunkering has already started, and creates some latency (overly long tail) on 6301_61_minus1.

Wait a few hours until bunker is released. 15 hours and 18 mins to start.

pinhodecarlos · 2015-08-28, 10:37

Please be aware that more 14e integers might be needed. Let's wait for the first dump from teams regarding the challenge but my expectation is to see more than 14e 10k wus processed daily during this period. It can be higher if Mumps decides to run it because we are trying to reach a milestone badge for the team.

debrouxl · 2015-08-28, 17:26

So far, the number of 14e WUs in flight (pending) at a given time is 3-4x the usual number.
SNFS difficulty 24x tasks seldom require less than 5K WUs, fairly often 10K WUs. IOW, at a rate of 10K WUs per day, clients would crunch at most two numbers every day.
Thanks for the notice, but I have a hard time getting worried right now, frankly

VictordeHolland · 2015-08-29, 13:03

Can we download relations or will that impact server performance (bandwidth) too much with the challenge going on??

pinhodecarlos · 2015-08-29, 14:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictordeHolland

Can we download relations or will that impact server performance (bandwidth) too much with the challenge going on??

Try.

VictordeHolland · 2015-08-29, 17:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos

Try.

I've started downloading the relations for 1900421426047_19_minus1, should be ready in about 30 min.

2015-08-28, 17:26	#195
debrouxl Sep 2009 977 Posts	So far, the number of 14e WUs in flight (pending) at a given time is 3-4x the usual number. SNFS difficulty 24x tasks seldom require less than 5K WUs, fairly often 10K WUs. IOW, at a rate of 10K WUs per day, clients would crunch at most two numbers every day. Thanks for the notice, but I have a hard time getting worried right now, frankly Last fiddled with by debrouxl on 2015-08-28 at 17:27

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
System management notes	kriesel	kriesel	7	2020-10-21 18:52
Improving the queue management.	debrouxl	NFS@Home	10	2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management	ewmayer	Software	3	2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!)	jasong	jasong	35	2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings	PrimeCroat	Hardware	3	2004-02-17 19:11

2015-08-27, 06:39	#190
debrouxl Sep 2009 1111010001₂ Posts	Yeah, Homogeneous Cunninghams are one of the sources of numbers we tap once in a while, under the usual guidelines ( http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=167 ). But now that we've queued a couple dozen numbers, there will be some latency for the three XYYXF numbers suggested by Sean, some yet unreserved Homogeneous Cunninghams, or anything else.

2015-08-27, 08:37	#192
debrouxl Sep 2009 1721₈ Posts	Yes, the bunkering has already started, and creates some latency (overly long tail) on 6301_61_minus1.

2015-08-28, 10:37	#194
pinhodecarlos "Carlos Pinho" Oct 2011 Milton Keynes, UK 11523₈ Posts	Please be aware that more 14e integers might be needed. Let's wait for the first dump from teams regarding the challenge but my expectation is to see more than 14e 10k wus processed daily during this period. It can be higher if Mumps decides to run it because we are trying to reach a milestone badge for the team.

2015-08-29, 13:03	#196
VictordeHolland "Victor de Hollander" Aug 2011 the Netherlands 1176₁₀ Posts	Can we download relations or will that impact server performance (bandwidth) too much with the challenge going on??