mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home
Reload this Page Fast Breeding (guru management)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
Page 121 of 225 « First 117118119120 121 122123124125 Last »
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-01-26, 22:07   #1321
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

3,391 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris2be8 View Post
A C199 quartic will be harder on the rational side, so I would expect
Code:
mfbr: 92
mfba: 62
rlambda: 3.6
alambda: 2.6
to work better. At least try trial sieving it.

Chris
I only got to this point before I noticed the above post. All times on a C2D laptop. (5K blocks)
Code:
       mfba=92       mfba=91
    Yield sec/rel Yield sec/rel
20M  6624  0.399   6623  0.450 
60M  9439  0.366   9439  0.375
I wasn't sure if I should stay on the rational side or not. Since I normally put the 3LP on the non-sieving side I tried -a side first. After a few hundred Q I abandoned that approach. Yield < 1.0 and the times doubled.

So I went back to the -r side. Times increased a bit but now getting yield close to 3.0. I will repost the full poly when I complete all the trial sieving. Thank you for the insider information.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-28, 15:51   #1322
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

3,391 Posts
Default Repost C199 (p54^5-1)
QUEUED Thanks to the help from chris2be8 we have better parameters for the original poly from this post.
Code:
n: 5262199667347704370383382573882546842844132668115527189076062581874638943044817276421916975296385935474146837843853199024201903372763704218014620151293853622962990584469731632691969324944794952060901
# 441047607640944329101719685655443319185854243052422221^5-1, difficulty: 214.58, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45
# cost: 4.90392e+17, est. time: 233.52 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c4: 1
c3: 1
c2: 1
c1: 1
c0: 1
Y1: -1
Y0: 441047607640944329101719685655443319185854243052422221
m: 441047607640944329101719685655443319185854243052422221
type: snfs
rlim: 67000000
alim: 67000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 92
mfba: 62
rlambda: 3.6
alambda: 2.6
Trial sieving 5K blocks. (C2D timings.)
Code:
  Q  Yield sec/rel
 20M 13040  0.309
 60M 14466  0.486
100M 14234  0.521
120M 13701  0.487
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2018-01-30 at 22:49
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-29, 18:09   #1323
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

3,391 Posts
Default
QUEUED C197 from the OPN t1600 file.
( a.k.a. Phi_5(Phi_3(Phi_2(Phi_3(Phi_7(Phi_11(2801)/small)/small)/small)/small)/small)/small) )
or P55.76454_5M.C197
Code:
n: 15420106394864175646956697460687018537255496896008096522537550268413863999071964128123246880858150236150236618717851768444792711346084264069707278037651651645100472752767291966576474365987720132361
# 7645463225990568242011672429536839102186796836095591099^5-1, difficulty: 219.53, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 1.45
# cost: 7.40309e+17, est. time: 352.53 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c4: 1
c3: 1
c2: 1
c1: 1
c0: 1
Y1: -1
Y0: 7645463225990568242011672429536839102186796836095591099
type: snfs
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 92
mfba: 62
rlambda: 3.6
alambda: 2.6
Trial sieving 5K blocks.
Code:
  Q  Yield
 20M  8235
 60M  9540
100M 10126
140M  9152
180M  8438
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2018-01-30 at 22:50
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 07:46   #1324
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23×11×73 Posts
Default
Do you want to use 14e or 15e for these quartics?
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 13:19   #1325
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11·281 Posts
Default
QUEUED C180_144_55 is the composite cofactor remaining after yoyo@Home found a p54. At first I assumed this would be best factored using GNFS (there have been a few examples from the xyyx project in the last few weeks) but test sieving shows that factoring this composite using SNFS is still the best strategy.

Use 14e.

Code:
n: 117584889783093103096672802605868198355384364847159094368448829303838825468335358899723272324256691112560210596562609505161517633649883850274330478506472074476907005355795371114817
# 144^55+55^144, difficulty: 250.61, anorm: 2.40e+037, rnorm: 3.88e+047
# scaled difficulty: 252.31, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.493e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.298e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 250
skew: 2.2894
c6: 1
c0: 144
Y1: -26623333280885243904
Y0: 587089817274070447368135511875152587890625
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8

Code:
Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 5K:
Q=20M     16680
Q=70M     14081
Q=110     13510
Q=180     10870
Q=230     10943
Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-210M with target # relations = 490M.
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2018-01-30 at 22:38
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 13:20   #1326
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11×281 Posts
Default
QUEUED C233_144_53 is ready for SNFS on 14e.
Code:
n: 38374312398283582325657648808004146969907525900800855301406386671996814999601395796168777811469002125491748155628991413242994998135066203928803044194578764063765362584114426962905305186903758830477297619339375543622596742289572279889
# 144^53+53^144, difficulty: 249.50, anorm: 7.20e+037, rnorm: 2.11e+047
# scaled difficulty: 251.08, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.537e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.345e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 249
skew: 1.3104
c6: 16
c0: 81
Y1: -8874444426961747968
Y0: 241335311011519234780052665404754645838881
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7

Test sieving on the -r side with Q in blocks of 5K:
Code:
Q=20M     8626
Q=60M     7097
Q=110M    6800
Q=170M    5293
Q=220M    4861
Suggesting a sieving range for Q of 20M-210M with a target # rels = 240M
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2018-01-30 at 22:50
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 14:01   #1327
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

3,391 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
Do you want to use 14e or 15e for these quartics?
Use 14e unless 15e is explicitly stated.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 14:37   #1328
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,087 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Code:
n: 117584889783093103096672802605868198355384364847159094368448829303838825468335358899723272324256691112560210596562609505161517633649883850274330478506472074476907005355795371114817
# 144^55+55^144, difficulty: 250.61, anorm: 2.40e+037, rnorm: 3.88e+047
# scaled difficulty: 252.31, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.493e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.298e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 250
skew: 2.2894
c6: 1
c0: 144
Y1: -26623333280885243904
Y0: 587089817274070447368135511875152587890625
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8
Out of curiosity, how does it compare against
Code:
n: 117584889783093103096672802605868198355384364847159094368448829303838825468335358899723272324256691112560210596562609505161517633649883850274330478506472074476907005355795371114817
# 144^55+55^144, difficulty: 250.61, anorm: 2.40e+037, rnorm: 3.88e+047
# scaled difficulty: 252.31, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.493e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.298e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 250
skew: 1.2
c6: 4
c0: 9
Y1: -53246666561770487808
Y0: 587089817274070447368135511875152587890625
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 14:56   #1329
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,087 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Code:
n: 38374312398283582325657648808004146969907525900800855301406386671996814999601395796168777811469002125491748155628991413242994998135066203928803044194578764063765362584114426962905305186903758830477297619339375543622596742289572279889
# 144^53+53^144, difficulty: 249.50, anorm: 7.20e+037, rnorm: 2.11e+047
# scaled difficulty: 251.08, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.537e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.345e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 249
skew: 1.3104
c6: 16
c0: 81
Y1: -8874444426961747968
Y0: 241335311011519234780052665404754645838881
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
Similarly
Code:
n: 38374312398283582325657648808004146969907525900800855301406386671996814999601395796168777811469002125491748155628991413242994998135066203928803044194578764063765362584114426962905305186903758830477297619339375543622596742289572279889
# 144^53+53^144, difficulty: 249.50, anorm: 7.20e+037, rnorm: 2.11e+047
# scaled difficulty: 251.08, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.537e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.345e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 249
skew: 1
c6: 9
c0: 4
Y1: -13311666640442621952
Y0: 241335311011519234780052665404754645838881
rlim: 134000000
alim: 134000000
lpbr: 31
lpba: 31
mfbr: 62
mfba: 62
rlambda: 2.7
alambda: 2.7
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 14:58   #1330
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11×281 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
Out of curiosity, how does it compare against
Code:
n: 117584889783093103096672802605868198355384364847159094368448829303838825468335358899723272324256691112560210596562609505161517633649883850274330478506472074476907005355795371114817
# 144^55+55^144, difficulty: 250.61, anorm: 2.40e+037, rnorm: 3.88e+047
# scaled difficulty: 252.31, suggest sieving rational side
# size = 2.493e-012, alpha = 0.000, combined = 2.298e-013, rroots = 0
type: snfs
size: 250
skew: 1.2
c6: 4
c0: 9
Y1: -53246666561770487808
Y0: 587089817274070447368135511875152587890625
rlim: 268000000
alim: 268000000
lpbr: 32
lpba: 32
mfbr: 64
mfba: 64
rlambda: 2.8
alambda: 2.8
That was the first candidate poly I test sieved, but it proved to be 10-15% slower with a slightly lower yield. Tested at both ends of the estimated sieving range and the results did not change, as I recall. Same thing with 144_53.
Last fiddled with by swellman on 2018-01-30 at 15:09
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-01-30, 15:12   #1331
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,087 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
That was the first candidate poly I test sieved, but it proved to be 10-15% slower with a slightly lower yield. Tested at both ends of the estimated sieving range and the results did not change, as I recall. Same thing with 144_53.
Cool Good to know
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 121 of 225 « First 117118119120 121 122123124125 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
System management notes kriesel kriesel 7 2020-10-21 18:52
Improving the queue management. debrouxl NFS@Home 10 2018-05-06 21:05
Script-based Primenet assignment management ewmayer Software 3 2017-05-25 04:02
Do normal adults give themselves an allowance? (...to fast or not to fast - there is no question!) jasong jasong 35 2016-12-11 00:57
Power Management settings PrimeCroat Hardware 3 2004-02-17 19:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:37.


Fri Aug 6 15:37:31 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 10:06, 1 user, load averages: 2.32, 2.61, 2.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.