mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-06-25, 04:18   #1992
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

11001000110002 Posts
Default

I think I have the reservations and completed-work synchronised now

Taking C206_129_95 (ETA morning of July 6)

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-06-28 at 16:59
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-25, 10:05   #1993
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

642410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
If 148^83+83^148 can get another ~60-70MQ scheduled to get raw rels over 700M, I can get the LA started before I leave.
I have stuck another 100MQ on C195_148_83
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-25, 19:13   #1994
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22×773 Posts
Default C205_125_117

Reserving C205_125_117 for postprocessing. Thank you.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-26, 07:57   #1995
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23×11×73 Posts
Default

Taking C208_138_73

ETA July 3rd

Revised ETA July 6th, because I forgot to restart it to run over the weekend when my machine crashed late on Friday night

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-07-03 at 09:12
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-27, 22:51   #1996
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

C1416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
If 148^83+83^148 can get another ~60-70MQ scheduled to get raw rels over 700M, I can get the LA started before I leave. It's a 4-node Dell C6100, for which MadPoo sent me his drawer of server DDR2 4GB sticks; two nodes have 32gb and two have 24gb, so I can run a second LA job over summer.
I'm very curious to see if a) you can now get 148_83 into LA with your hardware; and b) how long it will take to solve it. Rooting for success!

What is the minimum number of relations for a 33-but job? I had assumed it was north of 900M, but you often seem to solve 31 and 32-bit jobs with less than the typical number of relations so I'm rethinking the issue. Good luck whatever the final number is.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-28, 03:56   #1997
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

2·2,437 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
I'm very curious to see if a) you can now get 148_83 into LA with your hardware; and b) how long it will take to solve it. Rooting for success!

What is the minimum number of relations for a 33-but job? I had assumed it was north of 900M, but you often seem to solve 31 and 32-bit jobs with less than the typical number of relations so I'm rethinking the issue. Good luck whatever the final number is.
I solved 13*2^864-1 with 15e/33LP and needed 620M raw relations to build a TD=124 matrix. But that was SNFS-264 or so, much smaller than this candidate. 13*2^837-1 was also 15e/33LP, took 557M raw relations for ~SNFS-256; I believe that one would have been quicker as 32LP, but not by much; that factorization provides a reasonable lower bound for # of relations needed, I think- that matrix built at TD=116.
13*2^827-1, a C251, built a TD=116 matrix with 326M raw relations with 15e/32.

Two data points with small inputs isn't enough to fit a regression for # of relations vs input size; I look forward to seeing if 750M is enough for this rather large task. I'll wait a day or two to try filtering, since I may need every last relation. If I accept that 8 digits of SNFS diffculty requies 60M more relations (per the two above data points), 750M relations should be sufficient for SNFS-279ish; well short of this GNFS-194. Maybe I'll need 825M to get TD above 120...

I plan to gather more 33LP data by running some snfs-250 through NFS@home as 14e/33; I think 550-575M rels will work, and wish to demonstrate this.

Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2017-06-28 at 04:02
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-29, 07:49   #1998
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23×11×73 Posts
Default

I have done three 33-bit GNFS jobs above 190 digits.

Code:
192.3  15e  971.4Mr/680.3Mu  39.1M  1140hrs i7/5820Kx6  td=128, td=144 failed
193.1  15e  873.0Mr/659.5Mu  34.5M  706hrs  i7/4930Kx6  td=120
196.8  16e  885.4Mr/645.7Mu  33.4M  852hrs  K10/1900x24MPI  td=120
I would be quite surprised if you can make a usable matrix with less than 850M raw relations at this level; accordingly I have pushed Q_max up to 900M.

I have also done some SNFS jobs with 33-bit large primes
Code:
272.8  15e  1064.4Mr/790.2Mu  44.2M  1550hrs i7/5820Kx6 td=160
278.9  15e   985.4Mr/742.4Mu  42.8M  1290hrs  K10/1900x48MPI  td=136, td=144 failed
I think it would be useful to record the size as well as the density of the matrices you obtained in previous work

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-06-29 at 07:54
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-30, 20:04   #1999
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

22×773 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Reserving C205_125_117 for postprocessing. Thank you.
ETA is 19 July.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-04, 02:24   #2000
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

26×53 Posts
Default

I'll take C215_145_52 next.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-05, 12:21   #2001
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

23×11×73 Posts
Default

Taking C198_149_50
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-07-05, 13:40   #2002
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

60248 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
If 148^83+83^148 can get another ~60-70MQ scheduled to get raw rels over 700M, I can get the LA started before I leave. It's a 4-node Dell C6100, for which MadPoo sent me his drawer of server DDR2 4GB sticks; two nodes have 32gb and two have 24gb, so I can run a second LA job over summer.
Any progress on 148^83+83^148?
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
restarting nfs linear algebra cubaq YAFU 2 2017-04-02 11:35
Linear algebra at 600% CRGreathouse Msieve 8 2009-08-05 07:25
Linear algebra crashes 10metreh Msieve 3 2009-02-02 08:34
Linear algebra proof Damian Math 8 2007-02-12 22:25
Linear algebra in MPQS R1zZ1 Factoring 2 2007-02-02 06:45

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:04.


Fri Aug 6 22:04:41 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:33, 1 user, load averages: 3.08, 2.85, 2.72

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.