![]() |
|
|
#1992 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
11001000110002 Posts |
I think I have the reservations and completed-work synchronised now
Taking C206_129_95 (ETA morning of July 6) Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-06-28 at 16:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1993 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
642410 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1994 |
|
Jun 2012
22×773 Posts |
Reserving C205_125_117 for postprocessing. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1995 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
Taking C208_138_73
ETA July 3rd Revised ETA July 6th, because I forgot to restart it to run over the weekend when my machine crashed late on Friday night Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-07-03 at 09:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1996 | |
|
Jun 2012
C1416 Posts |
Quote:
What is the minimum number of relations for a 33-but job? I had assumed it was north of 900M, but you often seem to solve 31 and 32-bit jobs with less than the typical number of relations so I'm rethinking the issue. Good luck whatever the final number is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1997 | |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2·2,437 Posts |
Quote:
13*2^827-1, a C251, built a TD=116 matrix with 326M raw relations with 15e/32. Two data points with small inputs isn't enough to fit a regression for # of relations vs input size; I look forward to seeing if 750M is enough for this rather large task. I'll wait a day or two to try filtering, since I may need every last relation. If I accept that 8 digits of SNFS diffculty requies 60M more relations (per the two above data points), 750M relations should be sufficient for SNFS-279ish; well short of this GNFS-194. Maybe I'll need 825M to get TD above 120... I plan to gather more 33LP data by running some snfs-250 through NFS@home as 14e/33; I think 550-575M rels will work, and wish to demonstrate this. Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2017-06-28 at 04:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1998 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
I have done three 33-bit GNFS jobs above 190 digits.
Code:
192.3 15e 971.4Mr/680.3Mu 39.1M 1140hrs i7/5820Kx6 td=128, td=144 failed 193.1 15e 873.0Mr/659.5Mu 34.5M 706hrs i7/4930Kx6 td=120 196.8 16e 885.4Mr/645.7Mu 33.4M 852hrs K10/1900x24MPI td=120 I have also done some SNFS jobs with 33-bit large primes Code:
272.8 15e 1064.4Mr/790.2Mu 44.2M 1550hrs i7/5820Kx6 td=160 278.9 15e 985.4Mr/742.4Mu 42.8M 1290hrs K10/1900x48MPI td=136, td=144 failed Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2017-06-29 at 07:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1999 |
|
Jun 2012
22×773 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2000 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
26×53 Posts |
I'll take C215_145_52 next.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2001 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
Taking C198_149_50
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2002 | |
|
Jun 2012
60248 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| restarting nfs linear algebra | cubaq | YAFU | 2 | 2017-04-02 11:35 |
| Linear algebra at 600% | CRGreathouse | Msieve | 8 | 2009-08-05 07:25 |
| Linear algebra crashes | 10metreh | Msieve | 3 | 2009-02-02 08:34 |
| Linear algebra proof | Damian | Math | 8 | 2007-02-12 22:25 |
| Linear algebra in MPQS | R1zZ1 | Factoring | 2 | 2007-02-02 06:45 |