mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > NFS@Home

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2016-11-24, 09:38   #1585
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

3×17×97 Posts
Default

I'll take C194_142_70 next.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-24, 13:12   #1586
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

3,089 Posts
Default

I must abandon my reservation for 150^122+122^150 cofactor. I had put this on the back burner for a while, then honestly forgot about it for a bit. Since "rediscovering" my reservation I've spent days trying to get this into LA - to no avail. The memory on my biggest baddest machine seems to have degraded (guessing) and I can't process this number.

Planning to experiment with a few of the easier 32-bit jobs, but I from now on I won't reserve a NFS@Home factorization until I've successfully downloaded it and made it into LA.
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-25, 06:19   #1587
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

10011010100112 Posts
Default

With regards to 8-7_305 please read this:

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=133
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-25, 06:43   #1588
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

3×17×97 Posts
Default

Release C194_142_70, I don't have machine to run this 32 bits tasks.
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-25, 12:42   #1589
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

2,593 Posts
Default

C169_3366_2156 completed - 68 hours for 8.9M matrix (TD=140).

Code:
prp77 factor: 25641422047868541686986107525186596561936623541345083157292277889617899142993
prp93 factor: 236987675809269531923788288063277096288560787567038249028484779323136113755266916583339154863
http://pastebin.com/kd8vPCqt

C229_148_70 completed - 31 hours for 6.2M matrix (TD=150).

Code:
prp59 factor: 31341865988592334418593864986093727905704570129434258989293
prp68 factor: 69427046440186584592164280112833479826741033494349863350321991599569
prp103 factor: 1038282752331259626425572544634440815688452884099890210062246681711726738973404015157301258187856223461
http://pastebin.com/UaQJMdWi
unconnected is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-26, 18:13   #1590
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

33468 Posts
Default C237_127_93 (15e) factored.

Code:
p51 factor: 297202845182863447345374726482649007673631788341481
p186 factor: 970553391576387434074331675298844842908403605335927176431147146123005272518243346310346847152873192974135025815202444672862587723955494504862775228821614081191765437121091590734210514727
Log: http://pastebin.com/0QxTm8Fw

This is a pretty bad ECM miss. This number should have had more than a t55, which would make missing a p51 very unlikely.

Last fiddled with by jyb on 2016-11-26 at 18:19
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-26, 18:32   #1591
pinhodecarlos
 
pinhodecarlos's Avatar
 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK

3·17·97 Posts
Default

Trying C196_137_66 (14e).
8-7_305 needs more sieving per http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=133

Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2016-11-26 at 18:50
pinhodecarlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-26, 19:19   #1592
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

3,089 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jyb View Post
Code:
p51 factor: 297202845182863447345374726482649007673631788341481
p186 factor: 970553391576387434074331675298844842908403605335927176431147146123005272518243346310346847152873192974135025815202444672862587723955494504862775228821614081191765437121091590734210514727
Log: http://pastebin.com/0QxTm8Fw

This is a pretty bad ECM miss. This number should have had more than a t55, which would make missing a p51 very unlikely.
It sustained a full t55 by yoyo@Home. An ECM miss, and an unfortunate one, but are you suggesting a SNFS 251 should have a partial t60 run prior to NFS?

Last fiddled with by swellman on 2016-11-26 at 19:19
swellman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-27, 00:09   #1593
jyb
 
jyb's Avatar
 
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA

176610 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
It sustained a full t55 by yoyo@Home. An ECM miss, and an unfortunate one, but are you suggesting a SNFS 251 should have a partial t60 run prior to NFS?
Well that's a good question. The answer depends on whom you ask. If you follow the standard 2/9 rule for a composite with SNFS difficulty 253.05, then yes, it should have more than just a t55. OTOH, there are threads on this forum where that topic has been debated, with Bob Silverman in particular favoring earlier commencement of NFS. (Though he never articulated any better actual guideline than the 2/9 rule.)

I'll point out that even with just a t55, there's less than a 1% chance that the p51 factor would not have been found. So mostly my comment was intended as a query to verify that this really did receive the ECM work that it deserved.
jyb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-27, 00:38   #1594
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

3×2,141 Posts
Default C272_136_105 at last done (job queued 30/Aug/2016)

Code:
Sat Nov 26 18:55:26 2016  p133 factor: 6543705328400180561577911640580975478076882049636590514144600269097437013273310299121836093980225911815544821116466542927850009998397
Sat Nov 26 18:55:26 2016  p139 factor: 3693792848093521850768683089919709265366228631806734580057526850215427168910019282185675375281048261775975004394791990644572376727424390683
1254 hours on 48 cores K10/1900 (2x4 grid of 6-thread jobs, on a single four-socket machine) for a 42.8M matrix at density 136; ETA at start was 834 hours, so I'm not sure why it took quite so long, I'd expected it to be done by Thanksgiving.

Log attached and at http://pastebin.com/SGJee32t
Attached Files
File Type: log C272_136_105.log (119.9 KB, 39 views)

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2016-12-06 at 17:36
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2016-11-27, 00:39   #1595
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

144278 Posts
Default

Taking on swellman's reservation for C277_150_122; anticipating this will be another eight-week job.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
restarting nfs linear algebra cubaq YAFU 2 2017-04-02 11:35
Linear algebra at 600% CRGreathouse Msieve 8 2009-08-05 07:25
Linear algebra crashes 10metreh Msieve 3 2009-02-02 08:34
Linear algebra proof Damian Math 8 2007-02-12 22:25
Linear algebra in MPQS R1zZ1 Factoring 2 2007-02-02 06:45

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:47.


Mon Aug 2 10:47:47 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 5:16, 0 users, load averages: 1.88, 1.62, 1.52

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.