|
2014-12-24, 14:45
|
#12 |
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
Unfortunately there is still a bug in the code.
 It is missing factors under certain unknown conditions. |
|
|
|
2014-12-29, 19:00
|
#13 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11×577 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by rogue on 2014-12-29 at 19:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-29, 19:11
|
#14 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11×577 Posts |
As if I haven't stated this already, I recommend against anyone using MultiSieve. Not only will I not support it, it will not test n < b for either Cullen or Woodall sieves. For Cullens n can be less than b, but not for Woodalls so it is eliminating candidates that should not be eliminated.
The recommended method of building candidates for testing is as follows: 1) Run gwcsieve_smallp to to p = n. 2) Using the output from step 1, run gcwsieve for p > n. |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Generalized Cullen and Woodall Searches | rogue | And now for something completely different | 40 | 2020-12-08 13:21 |
| Generalized Cullen and Woodall numbers | em99010pepe | Factoring | 9 | 2019-03-26 08:35 |
| Super Cullen & Woodall primes | Citrix | And now for something completely different | 1 | 2017-10-26 09:12 |
| Cullen and Woodall altering on Prime Pages | jasong | jasong | 9 | 2008-01-25 01:51 |
| Can we add Cullen and Woodall p-1ing here? | jasong | Marin's Mersenne-aries | 1 | 2007-11-18 23:17 |
