![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
2·5·239 Posts |
A few months ago, I requested a batch of 100 LL-TF assignments up to 73 bits. When I tried to request more assignments after submitting the results, I was told that I already had too many GHz-days queued up. I was not able to get more assignments until the GPU to 72 spider had picked up the results from PrimeNet.
This is probably a dumb question, but is there any way to get assignments beyond the limit, or have it removed, without creating another GPU to 72 account? Otherwise, this could be an inconvenience for people with lots of GPUs, or really fast ones. Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2014-11-28 at 19:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Apr 2014
2×3×7 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
The "AI" should observe past preformance, and allow assignments based on this. I personally have to step in and tell the AI that it should trust a particular worker, who can then reserve as much as they like in 1,000 batches. My apologies for the complexity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
2×5×239 Posts |
The thing is that it's not my first set of results. The website shows that I've completed 4,430 assignments.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPU-ECM digit limit? | davidp314 | GMP-ECM | 9 | 2016-05-06 15:34 |
| Limit on TF assignments? | Rodrigo | PrimeNet | 21 | 2016-05-01 15:42 |
| why are in the map LL tests over the limit? | joblack | Information & Answers | 6 | 2009-01-18 18:12 |
| limit in worktodo? | crash893 | Software | 2 | 2006-06-20 03:19 |
| FFT size limit (79M), SSE2 and P-1 | PageFault | Software | 3 | 2003-08-24 04:04 |