Move 56

Brian-E · 2014-11-28, 08:54

Maybe we have another quick only-move situation this time. Am I right in saying that the only reasonable way of dealing with their obvious threat of 57.Kg2 and 58.h3 mate is to play 56...Kh3?

paulunderwood · 2014-11-28, 11:01

Yes :smile:

henryzz · 2014-11-28, 22:15

Other than sacrifices I believe so.

richs · 2014-11-30, 20:59

I agree Kh3.

Brian-E · 2014-11-30, 21:08

Sounds like we agree and can play the move 56...Kh3 then, okay?

paulunderwood · 2014-11-30, 21:39

This is fine by me.

I think they will respond with Kg1 and we can continue with Be1 :smile:

Batalov · 2014-12-01, 03:21

I am not saying anything.

But if I were, then I would sneeze like this: -ahhhhhem-[SPOILER]smothered mate[/SPOILER]-achooo-!

richs · 2014-12-01, 04:31

Hmmmmm

Batalov · 2014-12-03, 00:56

Re: above. Just to make sure that we have an understanding, ...
It was to warn about the move [B]Be1[/B] ...or, oh, well any other move that doesn't interfere with 58.Rh5+.

It seemed as if it was almost a [I]cooperative [/I]play -- to get into this chess problem-type situation.
I wanted to leave everyone room to actually see it for yourself (this is what the game is all about!), -- and now you all have:

[QUOTE=Brian-E;388849]Ah, of course: 57...Bb4 58.Rh5+ is the same. David's neat mate-in-2 works whether we play ...h5 or not.[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't have said anything if the game was not over (which it was after the previous move).

Your only hope is that the opponents won't see the mate in 2, and I don't know if this can happen. I think they saw it even a few moves before. We'll see in a few hours, or maybe minutes...

Brian-E · 2014-12-03, 11:59

There's a difference between a co-operative game and a normal one where the players show good sportspersonship. It is good etiquette if, when faced with a hopeless position, to allow your opponent to play a pretty finish if it's available.:smile:

2014-11-28, 08:54	#1
Brian-E "Brian" Jul 2007 The Netherlands 7×467 Posts	Move 56 Maybe we have another quick only-move situation this time. Am I right in saying that the only reasonable way of dealing with their obvious threat of 57.Kg2 and 58.h3 mate is to play 56...Kh3?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	1	2016-10-25 18:03
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	5	2016-10-22 01:55
Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	0	2016-10-05 15:50
Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	0	2016-09-28 19:51
Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	0	2016-09-19 19:56

2014-11-28, 11:01	#2
paulunderwood Sep 2002 Database er0rr 3,739 Posts	Yes :smile:

2014-11-28, 22:15	#3
henryzz Just call me Henry "David" Sep 2007 Cambridge (GMT/BST) 2³·3·5·7² Posts	Other than sacrifices I believe so.

2014-11-30, 20:59	#4
richs "Rich" Aug 2002 Benicia, California 2431₈ Posts	I agree Kh3.

2014-11-30, 21:08	#5
Brian-E "Brian" Jul 2007 The Netherlands 110011000101₂ Posts	Sounds like we agree and can play the move 56...Kh3 then, okay?

2014-11-30, 21:39	#6
paulunderwood Sep 2002 Database er0rr 7233₈ Posts	This is fine by me. I think they will respond with Kg1 and we can continue with Be1 :smile:

2014-12-01, 03:21	#7
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3⁶·13 Posts	I am not saying anything. But if I were, then I would sneeze like this: -ahhhhhem-[SPOILER]smothered mate[/SPOILER]-achooo-!

2014-12-01, 04:31	#8
richs "Rich" Aug 2002 Benicia, California 3²×5×29 Posts	Hmmmmm

2014-12-03, 00:56	#9
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 3⁶×13 Posts	Re: above. Just to make sure that we have an understanding, ... It was to warn about the move [B]Be1[/B] ...or, oh, well any other move that doesn't interfere with 58.Rh5+. It seemed as if it was almost a [I]cooperative [/I]play -- to get into this chess problem-type situation. I wanted to leave everyone room to actually see it for yourself (this is what the game is all about!), -- and now you all have: [QUOTE=Brian-E;388849]Ah, of course: 57...Bb4 58.Rh5+ is the same. David's neat mate-in-2 works whether we play ...h5 or not.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't have said anything if the game was not over (which it was after the previous move). Your only hope is that the opponents won't see the mate in 2, and I don't know if this can happen. I think they saw it even a few moves before. We'll see in a few hours, or maybe minutes...

2014-12-03, 11:59	#10
Brian-E "Brian" Jul 2007 The Netherlands 7×467 Posts	There's a difference between a co-operative game and a normal one where the players show good sportspersonship. It is good etiquette if, when faced with a hopeless position, to allow your opponent to play a pretty finish if it's available.:smile: