|
2014-11-18, 18:40
|
#1 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
10010010011012 Posts |
Move 54
We have no choice. Shall we play Kg4 quickly? :smile:
|
|
|
2014-11-18, 18:45
|
#2 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
137758 Posts |
[QUOTE=paulunderwood;387998]We have no choice. Shall we play Kg4 quickly? :smile:[/QUOTE]
What about Kg6? |
|
|
|
2014-11-18, 18:50
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
10010010011012 Posts |
Oh yeah. I did not see that, but the discovered check by White will be lethal to us. :smile:
|
|
|
|
2014-11-18, 22:20
|
#4 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3×23×89 Posts |
54...Ke4 Kf2 doesn't looks great to me.
[QUOTE=henryzz;387034]Assuming you meant Rf5+ 53.Rf7 Ne6 54.Rf5+ Kg4 55.Kf2 55...Ng7 56.Rb5 Kh3 57.Kg1 Bd4+ 58.Kh1 Kg4 59.Kg2 and mate is assured 55...Bd4 56.Kg2 mate is assured 55...Nd4 56.h3+ Kxh3 57.Rh5+ mate is assured I can also find mate for Nf4 but not yet for Be1+. Of course neither are good. I find it weird how I get into sessions of being able to think loads about a position fairly well. I am having to record where I am upto today but doing well. Keep finding escapes for me to refute.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
2014-11-19, 01:04
|
#5 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
While they can force mate after 54...Kg4 as you analyse, David, I think we still have to play it. As Paul says, the discovered check after 54...Kg6 is lethal - they can simply take off our bishop with it. If we had to play 54...Kg6 and give up a piece, it would be more sensible to just resign. Ergo, 54...Kg4 is the only move in my opinion. They then have to demonstrate that they can see how to finish us off.
Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2014-11-19 at 01:06 |
|
|
|
2014-11-19, 05:41
|
#6 |
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
6B616 Posts |
Let's do Kg4 but I think resigning is in our future....
|
|
|
|
2014-11-21, 10:48
|
#7 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
So based on participation so far we have:
Paul: 54...Kg4 (but possibly changed opinion?) David: 54...Kg6 (suggested, not clearly chosen) Brian: 54...Kg4 Rich: 54...Kg4 Should that list of votes be modified or clarified? |
|
|
|
2014-11-21, 11:34
|
#8 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5·937 Posts |
Kg4 for me. :smile:
|
|
|
|
2014-11-21, 14:56
|
#9 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
171810 Posts |
I confirm Kg4 for me.
|
|
|
|
2014-11-21, 19:07
|
#10 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3×23×89 Posts |
kg4
|
|
|
|
2014-11-21, 19:57
|
#11 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
327810 Posts |
Kg4
<all nodding our heads> |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |
