|
2014-11-12, 04:24
|
#1 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5×937 Posts |
Move 53
Richs' line:
53.Rf7 Ne6 54.Rf5+ Kg4 55.Kf2 Ng7 56.Rb5 Kh3 57.Kg1 Bd4+ 58.Kh1 Kg4 59.Kg2 and mate is assured is my favorite now :smile: Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2014-11-12 at 04:24 |
|
|
2014-11-12, 05:58
|
#2 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5·937 Posts |
I should have said "David's line" :smile:
|
|
|
|
2014-11-12, 09:43
|
#3 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
53...Ne6 is a reasonable move (while everything loses anyway).
The other move I think is worth considering is 53...Kg4. I see no other sensible move than 53...Ne6 or 53...Kg4. 53...h5 54.Rf5+, or 53...Bf6 54.h4+, or 53...Bd4 54.Rf5+ Kg4 55.Rf4+ all drop a piece in simple fashion. 53...Bb4 places the bishop where it can't defend by going to d4 anymore. 53...Na6 just puts the horse out of action too. Am I correct that 53...Ne6 and 53...Kg4 are the only two reasonable options this move? |
|
|
|
2014-11-12, 09:58
|
#4 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
111158 Posts |
This line does not look good for us:
53...Kg4 54.Rf4+ Kh3 55.Rh4+ :sad: |
|
|
|
2014-11-12, 12:58
|
#5 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
63168 Posts |
[QUOTE=paulunderwood;387466]This line does not look good for us:
53...Kg4 54.Rf4+ Kh3 55.Rh4+ :sad:[/QUOTE] You're right, that's instant resignation. In which case, is 53...Ne6 our only possible move? [ If, like last time, we have only one reasonable move, I suggest playing it fairly promptly this time. In the situation in which we find ourselves, unnecessary delay to our game will not only be frustrating to our opponents, the arbiter and anyone still following the game as a spectator, but it also draws out our own agony unnecessarily. That's just my opinion, those who disagree please say so, and I'll back down.:smile:] |
|
|
|
2014-11-14, 19:30
|
#6 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
I agree with Ne6. I also agree we should post quickly.
|
|
|
|
2014-11-16, 09:47
|
#7 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
1100110011102 Posts |
Rich, if you're around could you please post your opinion?
|
|
|
|
2014-11-16, 23:37
|
#8 |
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2·859 Posts |
Sorry for being quiet. Had two audit/inspections by customers this past week which kept me busy.
I am ok with Ne6. |
|
|
|
2014-11-17, 01:06
|
#9 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
That's agreement for 53...Ne6 then, I guess. Shall we play the move?:smile:
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |
