![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·5·7·139 Posts |
Quote:
Roundabouts take a bit more training, but can be very efficient. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
Anyway, I'll have to deal with this as soon as I buy a car. Already comfortable walking on the sidewalk, crossing the street, drinking pints...lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
260216 Posts |
Quote:
I personally look both ways (twice) before crossing as a pedestrian (even on a one-way road). Never underestimate the stupidity of a driver. "I didn't see them!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Driving a car with the wheel on the right side (i.e. driving on the left side of the road) is more convenient for a right-handed, I can drive with only one hand (and one foot, when in an automatic car). And I am not talking unilateral, I am being equally skilled in both left and right driving (well, "skilled" is the wrong word, I never liked driving in Ro, on the "european" side, for a million of reasons, like bad weather, winter, corrupt (abusive) policemen, bad streets, old (manual) car available only (at that time), etc, but I _love_ driving in Th, nicer cars (both manual and automatic), better streets, no winter, the police does not abuse you, etc). Driving with only one hand is a bless (unless you are left-handed), you have the blinking lights on the right, you switch them on/off with the same hand "on the way" when you are steering, actually I never put my left hand on the wheel. You can be much faster with a single hand (especially at u-turns) than with two, and additionally, logically speaking, both left and right side driving countries have the "priority of right" rule, and this rule is totally stupid when you drive on the right side (like in Ro), because it has to make a lot of exceptions (and exceptions from the logic too!). For example, at a roundabout, the cars inside of the circle must have priority against the cars which come into the circle, because otherwise the circle would be filled with cars and the circulation is bottlenecked. Therefore the cars already inside have to go first, to free the circle. In the "british like" countries, the car inside of the circle comes from your right, so the "right priority" applies, you don't need a new rule for it. In the "european like" countries, the car inside of the circle comes from your left, so the rule does not apply, and you need an additional rule, stating that the cars inside the circle have priority, in spite of the "priority from the right" rule. Now, imagine that some roundabouts are quite big that you don't realize immediately that is a circle, and some idiots vandalized the signs (quite common in Ro, few years ago). Lots of accidents... I remember about 8 years ago or so, there was a big discussion in the parliament to change the rule to say that the car coming from the left has priority, but there was a huge opposition to it, with "experts" demonstrating with angles and so on, that the driver has a better vision in this or that side, and this guy can see the other car before the other guy can see this car, etc... Lots of wasted time, on the tax payer's money. At the end they used signs saying that "in this intersection the priority from the right does not apply", like the normal signs would not suffice. We had jokes about that for months, saying that the only places where logic (common sense) does not apply is the public toilet* and the Romanian roundabout. All in all, driving on the left side is much easier, more logical, and more fun... ---------- * this about the toilet goes like the guy coming into the toilet has priority against the guy exiting from the toilet when they meet at the door, because otherwise he will pee his pants, but if many guys want to enter and exit in the same time, the toilet is full and you can't go inside, so, to avoid pissing your pants, you have to make a line (relay) and giving it from hand to hand...
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2015-03-12 at 10:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
494710 Posts |
After living on year in Brazil I'm safe here not to look both ways when crossing the street. I'm living in a small small city so no worries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
1075310 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Paul |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
We decided to go and come everyday by car. After first day of scoping not sure about all days are necessary for our propose. Tomorrow I will have a better understanding of our time available. Took us more than 2 hours to get there but only less than 1h30 to come back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
115238 Posts |
Now I'm planning at the end of August a visit Cambdrige to celebrate my wife's birthday. Looking to stay in the centre town, maybe on a Premier Inn.
Still need to understand what to visit to localise the hotel nearby instead of using public transportation or my own car plus parking to move myself Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2016-07-18 at 12:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
We've decided for one day visit to Cambdrige Saturday 27th August. Too expensive to stay two nights there. What shall we visit?
Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2016-08-15 at 19:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3·17·97 Posts |
We are going to make another Cambridge visit but I am not sure if it is wise to do it on Boxing day or on the December 27. Paul and Tom, do you guys want to go for a tea?
Carlos |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rabin 80th-birthday conference (Cambridge, MA) | R.D. Silverman | Lounge | 20 | 2011-08-05 20:31 |