mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Hobbies > Chess > Game 2 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Toxic Geckos

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-10-13, 22:53   #12
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

110101101102 Posts
Default

Another line where we lose the h pawn:

49. ... Kf6
50. Bc2 Bd2
51. Ke2 Bc3
52. Rh7 Ke5
53. Rxh6

Perhaps we should reconsider my line presented in Move 48 with 49. ... Kf8?
richs is offline  
Old 2014-10-13, 23:02   #13
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

CCE16 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=richs;385126]Another line where we lose the h pawn:

49. ... Kf6
50. Bc2 Bd2
51. Ke2 Bc3
52. Rh7 Ke5
53. Rxh6

Perhaps we should reconsider my line presented in Move 48 with 49. ... Kf8?[/QUOTE]
52...Kg5 protects the h pawn in that line (and if h4+ Kh5). We would not have that luxury with our king stuck on our back rank.
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2014-10-13, 23:50   #14
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

2×859 Posts
Default

Alternatively:

52. ... Kg5
53. Kf3 Bd2
54. Rf7+ Kf6
55. Rh7 Bg5

and we still have life....

I agree with 49. ... Kf6
richs is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 00:38   #15
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

3×23×89 Posts
Default

Sorry been full of a cold and not had much time. Hopefully I should get to it tomorrow.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 17:09   #16
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

10111111111012 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Brian-E;384872]The line 49...Kf6 50.Rc7 Nxb3 51.Rc3 Nd4+ 52.Ke4 Ne2 53.Rc6+ Kg7 54.Kd3 wins the piece back for them and leaves an ending where they have the exchange and a pawn extra and we no longer have the drawing potential of opposite coloured bishops. Almost no chance for us to save the game here, I think. Can anyone improve on that line for us? If not, perhaps 49...Kd6 is necessary.

Interesting that they didn't force this while they could by playing 49.Rc6.

EDIT: 54...Nf4+! at the end of that line, but it's still hopeless I think: 55.gxf4 Bxf4 56.h3 (threat Rc5), Bg5 (intending ...Bd8) 57.Rd6 Bf4 58.Rd7+ Kg6 59.Ra7 picking up our a pawn.[/QUOTE]

52...Bb2 improves that line I think.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 17:15   #17
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

3×23×89 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=paulunderwood;384874]At the moment I prefer Richs' line:

[quote]48. ... Nc5
49. Ra7+ Kf8
50. Bc2 Bd2
51. Ke2 Bc3
52. Rc7 Bd4[/quote]

:smile:[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Brian-E;384875]Well, two problems with 49...Kf8:

They can keep our king confined to the back rank with their rook while they overwhelm us with their other pieces.

Or they can play 50.Rc7 with a line similar to the one in post #2 above.[/QUOTE]
This line seems to play pretty similarly to Kf6.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 17:24   #18
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

137758 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=paulunderwood;384906]Oops! I forgot about defending the a-pawn.

As you said:

[quote]49...Kf6 50.Rc7 Nxb3 51.Rc3 Nd4+ 52.Ke4 Ne2 53.Rc6+ Kg7 54.Kd3 Nf4+ 55.gxf4 Bxf4 56.h3[/quote]

but 56. ... Bg3 then onto d1 :smile:[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Brian-E;384908]Yes, this seems to work! I thought 57.Ke2 refuted, but then 57...Bh4 intending ...Bd8 and I can't see an immediate way for them to round up the a pawn.

However, they can of course march their king to b5 while keeping our king confined to our second rank so we cannot harass their h pawn, then give back the exchange on a5 and win the resulting pawns ending easily. So it is still a simple win for them.

Still, I definitely think 49...Kf6 is the right move now, 49...Kd6 being absolutely hopeless. They have a win with 50.Rc7, I think, but it's up to them to find it and have the confidence to play it. They didn't play 49.Rc6 which would have amounted to the same thing, so we can hope. :-)[/QUOTE]
What about 52...Bb2 ?
Is that too advantageous for us?
henryzz is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 21:05   #19
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

2×11×149 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Brian-E;384872]The line 49...Kf6 50.Rc7 Nxb3 51.Rc3 Nd4+ 52.Ke4 Ne2 53.Rc6+ Kg7 54.Kd3 wins the piece back for them and leaves an ending where they have the exchange and a pawn extra and we no longer have the drawing potential of opposite coloured bishops. Almost no chance for us to save the game here, I think. Can anyone improve on that line for us? If not, perhaps 49...Kd6 is necessary.

Interesting that they didn't force this while they could by playing 49.Rc6.

EDIT: 54...Nf4+! at the end of that line, but it's still hopeless I think: 55.gxf4 Bxf4 56.h3 (threat Rc5), Bg5 (intending ...Bd8) 57.Rd6 Bf4 58.Rd7+ Kg6 59.Ra7 picking up our a pawn.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=henryzz;385178]52...Bb2 improves that line I think.[/QUOTE]
I don't think so. 52...Bb2 53.Kxd4 leaves White with a won king and pawn ending.

EDIT for clarity: for example, 53.Kxd4 Kf5 54.h3! h5 55.Kc4 Bxc3 56.Kxc3 Ke4 57.g4 hxg4 58.hxg4 and the g pawn will decoy the black king sufficiently to queen the a pawn.

Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2014-10-14 at 21:41
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 21:11   #20
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

2·11·149 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=paulunderwood;384874]At the moment I prefer Richs' line:
[QUOTE]48. ... Nc5
49. Ra7+ Kf8
50. Bc2 Bd2
51. Ke2 Bc3
52. Rc7 Bd4
[/QUOTE]

:smile:[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=henryzz;385180]This line seems to play pretty similarly to Kf6.[/QUOTE]
Perhaps, but isn't the fact that after 49...Kf6 our king is not confined to the back rank important?
For example, if 49...Kf8 50.Bc2 Bd2 51.Ke2 Bc3 we must constantly look out for their move Rh7 at a point when we cannot reply ...Bg7, winning our h pawn.

I think 49...Kf6 loses, as does everything else, but it is a more active move than 49...Kf8 and so ought to give them more chance to go wrong.

Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2014-10-14 at 21:48 Reason: Removed a line which doesn't work. My mistake.
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 22:49   #21
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

3×23×89 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Brian-E;385193]Perhaps, but isn't the fact that after 49...Kf6 our king is not confined to the back rank important?
For example, if 49...Kf8 50.Bc2 Bd2 51.Ke2 Bc3 we must constantly look out for their move Rh7 at a point when we cannot reply ...Bg7, winning our h pawn.

I think 49...Kf6 loses, as does everything else, but it is a more active move than 49...Kf8 and so ought to give them more chance to go wrong.[/QUOTE]
Apart from the king being confined to the back row.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2014-10-14, 23:10   #22
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)

3×23×89 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Brian-E;385192]I don't think so. 52...Bb2 53.Kxd4 leaves White with a won king and pawn ending.

EDIT for clarity: for example, 53.Kxd4 Kf5 54.h3! h5 55.Kc4 Bxc3 56.Kxc3 Ke4 57.g4 hxg4 58.hxg4 and the g pawn will decoy the black king sufficiently to queen the a pawn.[/QUOTE]
I realized that it was possible to get it such that we were just a pawn down. I hoped that we could do that in a way that caused a draw. It seems not.
henryzz is offline  
 

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 1 2016-10-25 18:03
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 5 2016-10-22 01:55
Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-10-05 15:50
Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-09-28 19:51
Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-09-19 19:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:45.


Fri Jul 7 03:45:37 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 1:14, 0 users, load averages: 0.78, 0.88, 1.12

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔