![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72·131 Posts |
w=19397335 k=12312
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72·131 Posts |
[22619263, 12132]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72×131 Posts |
[50128873, 11436]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Jun 2003
13BC16 Posts |
Are you doing some kind of sieving?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72×131 Posts |
Can someone give me a hand with the stats here? These numbers aren't remotely consistent with being a sample from the sum of 100 Poisson variables with lambda=log(2^256) - that would have mu=17500 sigma=130, and so 11436 would be a thirty-SD event. Obviously sum(x1..x100) is not uncorrelated with sum(x2..x101) but I don't know how you'd model the partial sums. If you want some successive minima, I'll offer
Code:
[15751, 15454] [70221, 15444] [70465, 15330] [70477, 15226] [73797, 15050] [74683, 15012] [108285, 14898] [108291, 14874] [108447, 14762] [108745, 14560] [109381, 14550] [111915, 14250] [112045, 14172] [112177, 13980] [112303, 13890] [180585, 13664] [461083, 13660] [859837, 13600] [862003, 13558] [862045, 13554] [863853, 13550] [863967, 13404] [864153, 13212] [864667, 12960] [3231663, 12738] [6266061, 12660] [6266701, 12580] [6423013, 12522] [19397335, 12312] [22618995, 12212] [22619263, 12132] [50128303, 11986] [50128327, 11670] [50128383, 11588] [50128603, 11508] [50128623, 11498] [50128873, 11436] [114298947, 11394] [114299053, 11346] [114299865, 11334] [304607541, 11274] [319831065, 11124] [319831071, 11108] [319831123, 11088] [319831143, 11000] [319831585, 10902] [319831597, 10822] [319831975, 10470] [11006283127, 10402] [11006283133, 10390] [11006283163, 10350] Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2014-10-14 at 09:02 Reason: the search has gone on ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72·131 Posts |
I can't figure out how you'd sieve cleverly, so these results are just from calling pari nextprime() and maintaining a circular buffer. We need actual-primes (well, OK, we're far enough along Z that base-3 Fermat pseudoprimes would be pretty much as good), and at 2^256 I'm finding that less than 15% of numbers coprime to 10^6 are prime, so I don't think the sieving can save much.
Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2014-10-13 at 16:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Jun 2003
22·3·421 Posts |
Quote:
EDIT:- Actually, you might even avoid PRP checking all numbers, and only check sieve survivors occurring in a "tight" cluster. Last fiddled with by axn on 2014-10-13 at 16:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
72×131 Posts |
Go for it; you've more experience with sieve implementation than I have
Should we have a http://procrasti-nation.eu/wp-conten...e-my-money.jpg smiley? |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
I just did a list of 101 primes starting from 2^256. To this list, in an infinite loop, I add the next 2-PRP, and I eliminate the first in the list (with listput, listpop, my own 2-prp function which is about 5 times faster than pari's nextprime(), not compiled (i mean, in /gp). No presieving. The size is always a[#a]-a[1], and list operations are fast in pari. I keep the minimum size, and print it in case it appears.
This is the result of ~3 minutes of run, i will let it for few hours to see what it gets. I print all the results, in case the best interval contains a 2-pseudoprime, which is the worst thing which can happen... (well, the worst is that all intervals contains 2-PSP, which is highly improbable). The second parameter is an offset, in case I want to restart, and the last is the string used for nice printing Code:
gp > findmininterval(1<<256,0,101,"2^256") Found 101 primes in a 15444-long interval, starting from 2^256+[54777..70221] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 15330-long interval, starting from 2^256+[55135..70465] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 15226-long interval, starting from 2^256+[55251..70477] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 15050-long interval, starting from 2^256+[58747..73797] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 15012-long interval, starting from 2^256+[59671..74683] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14898-long interval, starting from 2^256+[93387..108285] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14874-long interval, starting from 2^256+[93417..108291] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14762-long interval, starting from 2^256+[93685..108447] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14560-long interval, starting from 2^256+[94185..108745] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14550-long interval, starting from 2^256+[94831..109381] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14250-long interval, starting from 2^256+[97665..111915] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 14172-long interval, starting from 2^256+[97873..112045] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13980-long interval, starting from 2^256+[98197..112177] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13890-long interval, starting from 2^256+[98413..112303] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13664-long interval, starting from 2^256+[166921..180585] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13660-long interval, starting from 2^256+[447423..461083] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13600-long interval, starting from 2^256+[846237..859837] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13558-long interval, starting from 2^256+[848445..862003] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13554-long interval, starting from 2^256+[848491..862045] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13554-long interval, starting from 2^256+[848541..862095] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13550-long interval, starting from 2^256+[850303..863853] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13404-long interval, starting from 2^256+[850563..863967] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 13212-long interval, starting from 2^256+[850941..864153] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 12960-long interval, starting from 2^256+[851707..864667] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 12738-long interval, starting from 2^256+[3218925..3231663] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 12660-long interval, starting from 2^256+[6253401..6266061] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 12580-long interval, starting from 2^256+[6254121..6266701] - still searching ... Found 101 primes in a 12522-long interval, starting from 2^256+[6410491..6423013] - still searching ... ... [ 18258865, 18276187 ] size 12522... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2014-10-13 at 16:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
191316 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Dec 2008
you know...around...
3·13·17 Posts |
Quote:
Maybe I do an overnight calculation to see if I can find some k<10^4. Looking at the prime gap listings, the gap at 5378 is currently the best one below 2^256, so the next milestone would be a cluster with k=5376...
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sieving with powers of small primes in the Small Prime variation of the Quadratic Sieve | mickfrancis | Factoring | 2 | 2016-05-06 08:13 |
| A small puzzle | Dubslow | Puzzles | 18 | 2015-12-01 07:41 |
| Zeta nontrivial zeros list | Damian | Analysis & Analytic Number Theory | 11 | 2013-01-11 05:54 |
| New puzzle about prime | wpolly | Puzzles | 2 | 2009-07-02 20:27 |
| Prime Puzzle #190 | rogue | Puzzles | 17 | 2006-09-15 19:08 |