![]() |
|
|
#100 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4,861 Posts |
The log doesn't list the parameters chosen; if you chose some unusual parameters, you might really need more relations. If you have a linux environment, you could try filtering with the CADO tools, though that's surely a learning curve to figure out how to convert your present data/parameters into CADO-friendly formats.
Sometimes filtering fails from too many relations; there's a flag you can invoke to tell it to use only the first, say, 90M relations. Or, you could try building with target-density=120, as that extra filtering might magically cure the "too many relations" issue. Without knowing what large-prime bounds you used, it's not obvious to me whether you have too many relations or too few. If you used lpbr/lpba = 31, 130M-150M raw relations might be necessary; but 31lp would be an ununusal choice for this size GNFS job. I did a GNFS146 wtih 30lp, needing 75M raw relations, and I'm pretty aggressive about choosing larger large-prime bounds than most others around here (meaning I doubt any program chose 31lp on your behalf). If 70-80M rels were all you need, using target-density might fix it; if not, you may have to use the filtering flag about number of relations ask msieve for its flag list via msieve -h). |
|
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3,541 Posts |
It looks like the large dataset bug. There is what may be a fix in the latest SVN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
23×3×5×72 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5×17 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5×17 Posts |
The same behavior.
log file is attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5516 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
250018 Posts |
Could a case be made for DEFAULT_TARGET_DENSITY being set to something higher than 70.0?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5·17 Posts |
TD was set to 120 (in the run with msieve 1.53 svn 988)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
We may be talking at cross porpoises. In the source code here:
Code:
pcl@anubis ~/nums/msieve-code/trunk $ svn update Updating '.': At revision 993. pcl@anubis ~/nums/msieve-code/trunk $ grep DEFAULT_TARGET_DENSITY */*/* grep: b40c/b40c/radix_sort: Is a directory grep: b40c/b40c/util: Is a directory grep: b40c/test/bin: Is a directory grep: build.cuda.vc12/gnfs/gnfs: Is a directory grep: build.cuda.vc12/msieve/gnfs: Is a directory grep: build.cuda.vc12/sort_engine_sm20/b40c: Is a directory grep: build.cuda.vc12/stage1_core_sm20/gnfs: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/agent: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/block: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/device: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/grid: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/host: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/iterator: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/thread: Is a directory grep: cub/cub/warp: Is a directory gnfs/filter/filter.c:#define DEFAULT_TARGET_DENSITY 70.0 gnfs/filter/filter.c: merge->target_density = DEFAULT_TARGET_DENSITY; grep: gnfs/poly/stage1: Is a directory grep: gnfs/poly/stage2: Is a directory pcl@anubis ~/nums/msieve-code/trunk $ Personally I'd put the #define in filter.h but that's a different and entirely stylistic matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5×17 Posts |
Code:
Wed Jun 08 14:04:15 2016 setting target matrix density to 120.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Yes, we are talking at cross porpoises. You're referring to one particular run where the target density was specifically set to a (non-default) value of 120. I'm asking whether the default for all runs should be set higher than 70, which is what you get if you don't specify a value.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Msieve 1.50 feedback | firejuggler | Msieve | 99 | 2013-02-17 11:53 |
| Msieve v1.48 feedback | Jeff Gilchrist | Msieve | 48 | 2011-06-10 18:18 |
| Msieve 1.43 feedback | Jeff Gilchrist | Msieve | 47 | 2009-11-24 15:53 |
| Msieve 1.42 feedback | Andi47 | Msieve | 167 | 2009-10-18 19:37 |
| Msieve 1.41 Feedback | Batalov | Msieve | 130 | 2009-06-09 16:01 |