![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22×2,939 Posts |
p.s.: Maybe this just means I now need to run the .run files deposited in /root?
Yours truly, - cudaN00b |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
"Carl Darby"
Oct 2012
Spring Mountains, Nevada
4738 Posts |
Yes, or just invoking the .run file without the -extract option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
1175610 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
https://pedan.tech/
24×199 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22·2,939 Posts |
Thanks- but when I execute NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-319.37.run,
unlike the other 2 where all was strictly b&w text-only / command-line-only, now - this is via ssh from the Mac, mind you - I get a wild-colored "GUI like" EULA with 2 red accept / decline boxes at top. But double-clicking "Accept" only highlights the text in the box - i.e. I need a way of forcing things back into cmd-line mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22·2,939 Posts |
Quote:
The CC version check failed: The compiler used to compile the kernel (gcc 4.3) does not exactly match the current compiler (gcc 4.4). The Linux 2.6 kernel module loader rejects kernel modules built with a version of gcc that does not exactly match that of the compiler used to build the running kernel. If you know what you are doing and want to ignore the gcc version check, select "No" to continue installation. Otherwise, select "Yes" to abort installation, set the CC environment variable to the name of the compiler used to compile your kernel, and restart installation. Abort now? Safe to force continue? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Aug 2002
865810 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
32·7·163 Posts |
Also, try the -h option on the .run file.
IIRC, there was an option to confirm the agreement with the license from CL. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22·2,939 Posts |
Can anyone comment on the gcc 4.3 vs 4.4 issue?
Note that my Mlucas-builds-for-Haswell are pretty insensitive to the gcc version, so I'd be fine to downgrade to 4.3 if the CUDA 5.5 install really does have an issue with 4.4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
"Carl Darby"
Oct 2012
Spring Mountains, Nevada
13B16 Posts |
I've never dealt with this problem, so this is just from what I've read:
Its not CUDA5.5 that has problems with gcc4.4, its that the kernel module loader dislikes modules and kernels built with different gcc versions. Edit: Its not a problem to have multiple gcc versions. Last fiddled with by owftheevil on 2014-07-18 at 02:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Aug 2002
21D216 Posts |
This shows that 4.4 is what the system "expects": https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/gcc
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to install v25.9 on Linux? | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 10 | 2018-07-04 09:13 |
| CUDA Install errors...HELP...never mind | petrw1 | GPU Computing | 2 | 2016-03-06 13:39 |
| TF fetching/reporting toolkit for Linux | swl551 | PrimeNet | 20 | 2014-06-19 15:00 |
| CUDA Toolkit for OpenSUSE 11.2--gcc 4.5 and up are not supported | patrik | GPU Computing | 9 | 2012-04-07 03:50 |
| NVIDIA CUDA C toolkit for G80 GPU available | dsouza123 | Programming | 2 | 2007-02-18 12:50 |