![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Aug 2006
135338 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Aug 2006
3×1,993 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Jan 2013
109 Posts |
Intel Core i5-2450M 2.50Ghz x 2 threads of 64-bit siever, using modified Python script (raising minrels).
GNFS 127 took 2.4 hours to poly-select (manual shutdown), 23 hours to sieve and 1.1 hours for matrix. GNFS 139 took 12 hours to poly-select, 112.5 hours to sieve and 5.1 hours for matrix. Last fiddled with by prgamma10 on 2014-03-09 at 19:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
216810 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Jun 2003
5,051 Posts |
What he means is, the thread is posted under "Maths" forum, but the discussion is not centered around maths.
Perhaps the thread ought to be moved... but where to? Last fiddled with by philmoore on 2014-03-10 at 03:49 Reason: Moved to factoring - thanks for the suggestions! |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Estimating time needed for GNFS | CRGreathouse | Factoring | 0 | 2014-03-02 04:18 |
| Predicting the needed time for high n-values? | Rincewind | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 4 | 2009-06-11 12:24 |
| GNFS poly search time limit oddity | Andi47 | Msieve | 13 | 2009-02-25 12:33 |
| Discussion about CPU time needed and k's remaining | Siemelink | Conjectures 'R Us | 41 | 2008-07-11 23:05 |
| Running time for GNFS | koders333 | Factoring | 4 | 2006-02-27 14:33 |