mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Factoring

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-03-05, 01:49   #12
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

135338 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
Nice -- but hard to interpret without knowing what processors were used.
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-03-05, 02:50   #13
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

3×1,993 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinhodecarlos View Post
Excel sheet.
Great information! No CPUs, though, so this just speaks to the general scaling behavior.
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-03-09, 19:14   #14
prgamma10
 
prgamma10's Avatar
 
Jan 2013

109 Posts
Default

Intel Core i5-2450M 2.50Ghz x 2 threads of 64-bit siever, using modified Python script (raising minrels).

GNFS 127 took 2.4 hours to poly-select (manual shutdown), 23 hours to sieve and 1.1 hours for matrix.
GNFS 139 took 12 hours to poly-select, 112.5 hours to sieve and 5.1 hours for matrix.

Last fiddled with by prgamma10 on 2014-03-09 at 19:16
prgamma10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-03-09, 22:51   #15
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prgamma10 View Post
Intel Core i5-2450M 2.50Ghz x 2 threads of 64-bit siever, using modified Python script (raising minrels).

GNFS 127 took 2.4 hours to poly-select (manual shutdown), 23 hours to sieve and 1.1 hours for matrix.
GNFS 139 took 12 hours to poly-select, 112.5 hours to sieve and 5.1 hours for matrix.
I don't see any mathematics in this discussion.........
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-03-09, 22:58   #16
kracker
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

216810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
I don't see any mathematics in this discussion.........
It wasn't meant to be...??
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-03-10, 03:40   #17
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

5,051 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kracker View Post
It wasn't meant to be...??
What he means is, the thread is posted under "Maths" forum, but the discussion is not centered around maths.

Perhaps the thread ought to be moved... but where to?

Last fiddled with by philmoore on 2014-03-10 at 03:49 Reason: Moved to factoring - thanks for the suggestions!
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Estimating time needed for GNFS CRGreathouse Factoring 0 2014-03-02 04:18
Predicting the needed time for high n-values? Rincewind Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 4 2009-06-11 12:24
GNFS poly search time limit oddity Andi47 Msieve 13 2009-02-25 12:33
Discussion about CPU time needed and k's remaining Siemelink Conjectures 'R Us 41 2008-07-11 23:05
Running time for GNFS koders333 Factoring 4 2006-02-27 14:33

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:57.


Sat Jul 17 00:57:06 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 22:44, 1 user, load averages: 1.06, 1.26, 1.32

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.