![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
143138 Posts |
Quote:
I was under the impression that all of these projects were languishing due to low participation or lack of interest. The Cullen Prime Search started over at ProthSearch, which I maintain. I have absolutely no issues with PrimeGrid taking it over. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
260316 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11×577 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Jun 2003
110001011102 Posts |
I was talking about Prime Cullen prime (which was a very small subset of the main Cullen prime search). No one ever took permission from this project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Jul 2003
So Cal
210610 Posts |
I wouldn't be opposed to adding GPU TF to NFS@Home. It's not the core mission of the project, but we don't have any competing GPU apps right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
96610 Posts |
Quote:
The Riesel Problem, was manged by rieselsieve.com and it just vanished over night, with some people speculating that FBI had impounded the servers due to suspicion of the servers being used to support terrorism. I believe that was not the case, since it is more likely they may have ran out of personal time to spent or ran out of money. No matter what happened, the riesel problem did not progress at all untill Primegrid took up the effort to continue the work on the Riesel Problem. So 2 out of 2 has gained from this "stealing". However I do also believe that the mersenne search would benefit the most from having it's own server, since Primegrid may be at the limit of what they with their mighty resources can progress sufficiently in a timely manner. If the BOINC project becomes reality and it will offer only GPU work, then it is obvious that I at least won't be able to support the effort, however I do see a great potential to keep building a buffer. Especially if batches is created for each 10M or 25M, maybe combined with a special batch that gets rewarded to the most productive user in each range ![]() Well to see where this should go and how the users feel, then let's have some of the mods set up a poll, where everyone can cast a vote on weather or not to go BOINC and if we should go BOINC, then what kind of main focus should be the concern of BOINC. Thanks for all your replies and now just to make it clear once more, I first contacted Prime95 about considering BOINC and he referred me to chalsall who encouraged me to create this thread and get the debate started. So here we are ![]() Take care KEP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
2·3·7·23 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Collaboration Requests | robert44444uk | Prime Gap Searches | 2 | 2017-01-17 07:57 |
| PrimeGrid running a 3 day challenge on this Project | Joe O | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 1 | 2016-03-14 01:24 |
| PrimeGrid BOINC on FreeBSD | mazadillon | Prime Sierpinski Project | 3 | 2008-05-19 19:12 |
| Collaboration with PrimeGrid? | hhh | Prime Cullen Prime | 24 | 2007-09-11 06:52 |
| Bearnol's new BOINC project | jasong | jasong | 0 | 2007-02-01 00:30 |