![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3·5·59 Posts |
Is there something in place to prevent a person from reserving an exponent that has already been completed? Could CaptainEntropy come back and reserve a bunch of low exponents and clutter up the PrimeNet Summary page again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
45B16 Posts |
1. Other than the aesthetics of that page, what harm would it really do?
2. The new assignment rules will counteract antics like those that the "Cap'n" has played in the past. Even if he reserves large bricks of work, it will likely expire and be recycled faster than he can keep up with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3·5·59 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
May 2013
East. Always East.
11·157 Posts |
I don't see any harm in doing redundant work. Having random assignments in the bottom doesn't look as bad as a bunch of status unproven bits.
Maybe it would be simpler to have the server not show that any "DC's" are assigned if their status has been proved. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reserving k=607 | ForTex | Riesel Prime Search | 4 | 2018-04-24 14:20 |
| Reserving from 3M-->4M | pepi37 | No Prime Left Behind | 5 | 2013-09-17 21:46 |
| reasons why a LL test would be redundant | William Labbett | Information & Answers | 2 | 2011-10-11 11:03 |
| CPU almost redundant? | M0CZY | Software | 14 | 2011-02-10 13:53 |
| Reserving 97-98M to 2^64 | Bundu | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 7 | 2009-05-21 20:34 |