User TJAOI - Page 19

petrw1 · 2015-01-22, 17:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

Have you found any other problematic machines whose TF work needs to be checked?

Maybe some in the first 2 charts of my post #154???

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...&postcount=154

bloodIce · 2015-01-22, 17:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

This looks like "fresh factoring", i.e. the expected number of factors like the range was never touched. It is not like few accidentally omissions.

It is like having a time capsule and joining a prehistoric hunt, but armed with a machine gun. Basically, we are experiencing history, but we have GPUs and 1THzDay is not a big issue at least for some

.

petrw1 · 2015-01-22, 18:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by petrw1

10 hours ... 40% through the range ... 7 new factors so far.
Smallest just over 64 bits; largest just under 69 bits.
It's funny watching the classes ~~roll~~ fly by when its doing 65-66 bit range.
Thruput dropped from about 510 to 490 GhzDays/Day.
I may have some configuration parameters too high for smaller bit ranges.???

Code:

Manual testing	72401041	F	2015-01-22 14:27	0.0	218291136715616382799	0.2332
Manual testing	72382501	F	2015-01-22 14:27	0.0	342944142087508898161	0.1788
Manual testing	72363173	F	2015-01-22 14:27	0.0	544002637626766728503	0.7288
Manual testing	72349657	F	2015-01-22 14:27	0.0	315890959036043643191	0.0810
Manual testing	72337151	F	2015-01-22 14:27	0.0	34504309201726567649	0.0467
Manual testing	72237229	F	2015-01-22 10:27	0.0	364475248423316556359	0.2519
Manual testing	72180077	F	2015-01-22 10:27	0.0	210713469140678257513	0.2128

4 more ...

Code:

Manual testing	72605201	F	2015-01-22 18:27	0.0	500990223783061289983	0.6285
Manual testing	72562397	F	2015-01-22 18:27	0.0	87831182112341748793	0.0518
Manual testing	72523147	F	2015-01-22 18:27	0.0	335176031292832929289	0.1512
Manual testing	72506251	F	2015-01-22 18:27	0.0	336037822780058053313	0.1543

Mark Rose · 2015-01-22, 19:15

I guess I can post my list of 18 factors so far:

M51890519 has a factor: 422835347805002599631 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52138049 has a factor: 535974705886413199687 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52562327 has a factor: 296938917474700320121 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52722451 has a factor: 373035884518340430911 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52733041 has a factor: 525148122526114916273 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52736731 has a factor: 467377202976495825521 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52744631 has a factor: 441418946165759376247 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52752289 has a factor: 386313131512887140663 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52761881 has a factor: 515978965975485900689 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52762363 has a factor: 575234307694178809343 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52777031 has a factor: 418383038793943568999 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M52780037 has a factor: 533917432484655670393 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M68723147 has a factor: 269124663607229949599 [TF:67:68*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M68751467 has a factor: 272933318409841166999 [TF:67:68*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M68781347 has a factor: 112647003103135552151 [TF:65:67*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M68819329 has a factor: 372086203916326209001 [TF:68:69*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M68850539 has a factor: 273503990877618318281 [TF:67:68*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]
M80072843 has a factor: 50231130793387599631 [TF:65:66*:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs]

I'm basically working on two stream, with the 2 GTX 580's sharing work up to 68.7, and the GTX 760 doing 68.7 to 70. Easiest way to balance the work.

Interesting is 68850539 which was assigned to 5 users for LL. I don't know if there's a bug in overwriting the expire date.

52777031 was already found by P-1.

petrw1 · 2015-01-22, 19:52

In the end it would be interesting to know:

1. How many factors found
2. How many FIRST factors
3. How many were for exponents in progress
a. Two of mine were so far; one had TF assigned; one LL; both "expired" when I submitted my factors
4. How much "work" is saved: P-1; LL; DC
5. How much "work" did it take to do this re-check
6. How much work was wasted (later TF; P-1, LL, DC, etc. already done) though this could be depressing; also hard to count for partial assignments in progress.
7. Anything else?

Mark Rose · 2015-01-22, 20:04

I can answer 5 already: 10240 GHz-days, minus a little bit when sannerud.com continued factoring to bit levels beyond a missed exponent (which I have seen).

Mark Rose · 2015-01-22, 20:56

For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available:

76-77M: 1343 GHz-days
77-78M: 869 GHz-days
78-79M: 715 GHz-days
79-80M: 665 GHz-days

The assignments are be copy and pasted out of this file.

Chuck · 2015-01-22, 21:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available:

76-77M: 1343 GHz-days
77-78M: 869 GHz-days
78-79M: 715 GHz-days
79-80M: 665 GHz-days

The assignments are be copy and pasted out of this file.

My first batch are nearly done; I will also take 76-77M

petrw1 · 2015-01-22, 21:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available:

76-77M: 1343 GHz-days
77-78M: 869 GHz-days
78-79M: 715 GHz-days
79-80M: 665 GHz-days

The assignments are be copy and pasted out of this file.

77-78M

bloodIce · 2015-01-22, 21:50

~~I can take 78-79M, if it is tolerable to do it in 4-5 days.~~
Although I want to do it (or 79-80M as suggested), I realised that it is better for the project to be done quicker. This is semi-hot range and it could be nice to clean it fast. I jumped in because of impatience, but it is actually stupid. It seems that for the big guns around it will be over in 12-16h. Go for it, I have another double-check to do

. Sorry for the spam (the moderators may feel free to delete this post as unnecessary).

Mark Rose · 2015-01-22, 22:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by bloodIce

I can take 78-79M, if it is tolerable to do it in 4-5 days.

That's fine. Why not take 79-80M? It's smaller.

2015-01-22, 21:50	#208
bloodIce Feb 2010 Sweden 173 Posts	~~I can take 78-79M, if it is tolerable to do it in 4-5 days.~~ Although I want to do it (or 79-80M as suggested), I realised that it is better for the project to be done quicker. This is semi-hot range and it could be nice to clean it fast. I jumped in because of impatience, but it is actually stupid. It seems that for the big guns around it will be over in 12-16h. Go for it, I have another double-check to do . Sorry for the spam (the moderators may feel free to delete this post as unnecessary). Last fiddled with by bloodIce on 2015-01-22 at 22:26

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Old User	Unregistered	Information & Answers	1	2012-10-18 23:31
The user CP has gone :(	retina	Forum Feedback	5	2006-12-05 16:47
Changing My User ID	endless mike	NFSNET Discussion	1	2004-10-31 19:38
OSX yet? new user here	KevinLee	Hardware	6	2003-12-12 17:06
help for a Mac user	drakkar67	Software	3	2003-02-11 10:55

2015-01-22, 19:15	#202
Mark Rose "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 https://pedan.tech/ 2⁴·199 Posts	I guess I can post my list of 18 factors so far: M51890519 has a factor: 422835347805002599631 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52138049 has a factor: 535974705886413199687 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52562327 has a factor: 296938917474700320121 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52722451 has a factor: 373035884518340430911 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52733041 has a factor: 525148122526114916273 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52736731 has a factor: 467377202976495825521 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52744631 has a factor: 441418946165759376247 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52752289 has a factor: 386313131512887140663 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52761881 has a factor: 515978965975485900689 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52762363 has a factor: 575234307694178809343 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52777031 has a factor: 418383038793943568999 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M52780037 has a factor: 533917432484655670393 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M68723147 has a factor: 269124663607229949599 [TF:67:68:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M68751467 has a factor: 272933318409841166999 [TF:67:68:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M68781347 has a factor: 112647003103135552151 [TF:65:67:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M68819329 has a factor: 372086203916326209001 [TF:68:69:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M68850539 has a factor: 273503990877618318281 [TF:67:68:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] M80072843 has a factor: 50231130793387599631 [TF:65:66:mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] I'm basically working on two stream, with the 2 GTX 580's sharing work up to 68.7, and the GTX 760 doing 68.7 to 70. Easiest way to balance the work. Interesting is 68850539 which was assigned to 5 users for LL. I don't know if there's a bug in overwriting the expire date. 52777031 was already found by P-1.

2015-01-22, 19:52	#203
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 3·5²·71 Posts	In the end it would be interesting to know: 1. How many factors found 2. How many FIRST factors 3. How many were for exponents in progress a. Two of mine were so far; one had TF assigned; one LL; both "expired" when I submitted my factors 4. How much "work" is saved: P-1; LL; DC 5. How much "work" did it take to do this re-check 6. How much work was wasted (later TF; P-1, LL, DC, etc. already done) though this could be depressing; also hard to count for partial assignments in progress. 7. Anything else?

2015-01-22, 20:04	#204
Mark Rose "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 https://pedan.tech/ 2⁴·199 Posts	I can answer 5 already: 10240 GHz-days, minus a little bit when sannerud.com continued factoring to bit levels beyond a missed exponent (which I have seen).

2015-01-22, 20:56	#205
Mark Rose "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 https://pedan.tech/ 2⁴·199 Posts	For anyone curious, the following ranges are still available: 76-77M: 1343 GHz-days 77-78M: 869 GHz-days 78-79M: 715 GHz-days 79-80M: 665 GHz-days The assignments are be copy and pasted out of this file.