![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
173458 Posts |
![]()
Hi, my computer has showed a Round Off error while it works on LL. Could be it a problem for the test? What can be wrong on my computer?
Hola, mientras realizaba el Test de Lucas he observado un error del tipo Round Off. Esto puede ser un inconveniente para la fiabilidad del test? Puede ser producto de algun error de hardware o software en mi ordenador? |
![]() |
#2 |
Sep 2002
2·331 Posts |
![]()
Here is a link to a thread that is about Round off error.
http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?threadid=1490 Hope this helps. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
31·211 Posts |
![]()
OK, thanks.
The chance for bad result is about 50%... Bad news for me :( My computer was working on 15.020.000 iteration (44,60%).... |
![]() |
#4 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×3×52×72 Posts |
![]()
Some round off errors are OK. If the results.txt later said something like "Result is reproducible - ignore previous error" then all is OK.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Jul 2003
UK
638 Posts |
![]() Quote:
This is what you should be looking for in your results file Iteration: X / Y, ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.40625) > 0.40 Continuing from last save file. Disregard last error. Result is reproducible and thus not a hardware problem. For added safety, redoing iteration using a slower, more reliable method. Continuing from last save file where X is the iteration the error occured and Y is the exponent you are testing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2×23×151 Posts |
![]()
This is the results.txt message:
[Sun Jan 11 17:15:46 2004] Iteration: 15028608/33671789, ERROR: ROUND OFF (0.5) > 0.40 Continuing from last save file. Is my previous work right? How can I know it? |
![]() |
#7 |
Sep 2002
2×331 Posts |
![]()
If it reverts back to a checkpoint ( savefile ) which holds the state of the Prime95 work before the error happened it should be OK.
It will redo the work done since the savefile was written to disk. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
2×3×52×72 Posts |
![]() Quote:
The reported error did not cause your calculation to go wrong. The danger is that you may have had a hardware error that prime95 did not detect. From experience we find that machines that report one hardware error during a test have a 50% chance of producing a correct result. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
52×101 Posts |
![]()
Will be my computer chance 100% for any other exponent if I complete this exponent and LL result is correct in double check?
|
![]() |
#10 |
12558 Posts |
![]()
Here's the error i got:
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.4997747507, expected less than 0.4 Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file. its a new system and fresh install of win2k. Any idea what this means? Would appreciate any help :) Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2005-12-30 at 22:16 |
![]() |
#11 |
Feb 2003
2×59 Posts |
![]()
It could be a too aggressive overclock, or too aggressive memory timings, or a faulty memory, or a bad cooler. If your system turns at stock speed and the temperatures are reasonable, try running memtest86 to see if there is a problem with your memory.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Roundoff error | bcp19 | Software | 4 | 2013-02-14 21:23 |
error message help? | AurKayne | Hardware | 3 | 2005-08-29 09:13 |
Error message... | Xyzzy | GMP-ECM | 2 | 2005-03-04 20:17 |
Roundoff Error Penalty | nevarcds | Software | 5 | 2004-08-28 14:29 |
Error message | McBryce | NFSNET Discussion | 2 | 2003-07-07 11:35 |