![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
23×11×73 Posts |
Using the polynomial and parameters in http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...6&postcount=12
I get Avoton C2750 (2.4GHz) total yield: 1981, q=50001037 (0.14874 sec/rel) (I suspect this is because the machine has 24kb L1 cache) Running eight jobs on the eight cores gives me runtimes around 0.1575 sec/rel |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
642410 Posts |
This is running msieve-1.52 on the msieve.dat from http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~twomack/i7test.zip
Code:
Fri Dec 13 23:25:59 2013 matrix is 1067896 x 1068126 (312.4 MB) with weight 82099651 (76.86/col) Fri Dec 13 23:25:59 2013 sparse part has weight 71206234 (66.66/col) Fri Dec 13 23:25:59 2013 using block size 8192 and superblock size 98304 for processor cache size 1024 kB Fri Dec 13 23:26:08 2013 commencing Lanczos iteration (8 threads) Fri Dec 13 23:26:08 2013 memory use: 244.1 MB Fri Dec 13 23:26:13 2013 linear algebra at 0.1%, ETA 0h58m Fri Dec 13 23:26:14 2013 checkpointing every 1220000 dimensions Sat Dec 14 00:20:07 2013 lanczos halted after 16889 iterations (dim = 1067894) Sat Dec 14 00:20:09 2013 recovered 29 nontrivial dependencies Sat Dec 14 00:20:09 2013 BLanczosTime: 3461 Code:
Sat Dec 14 00:45:29 2013 matrix is 1067896 x 1068126 (312.4 MB) with weight 82099651 (76.86/col) Sat Dec 14 00:45:29 2013 sparse part has weight 71206234 (66.66/col) Sat Dec 14 00:45:29 2013 using block size 8192 and superblock size 98304 for processor cache size 1024 kB Sat Dec 14 00:45:38 2013 commencing Lanczos iteration Sat Dec 14 00:45:38 2013 memory use: 243.9 MB Sat Dec 14 00:45:59 2013 linear algebra at 0.1%, ETA 3h53m Sat Dec 14 00:46:06 2013 checkpointing every 280000 dimensions Sat Dec 14 04:46:35 2013 lanczos halted after 16891 iterations (dim = 1067894) Sat Dec 14 04:46:37 2013 recovered 29 nontrivial dependencies Sat Dec 14 04:46:37 2013 BLanczosTime: 14679 So in most senses this is actually a rather slow computer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
I wonder how it would compare in power consumption and throughput to our first box with a 486 DX-33. Sure has been a lot progress in a bit over 20 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Apr 2009
Venice, Chased by Jaws
8710 Posts |
I just recently bought an Intel NUC D54250WYKH and installed 8 GB of 1600 Mhz CL11 RAM. I wanted something small. portable, quiet and efficient and this suited my wants (I really didn't need it yet as my old workhorse, an Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86 GHz built back in Q4 of 2006 still works relatively well with some hiccups, however consumes on average 90Wh/h, running mprime this jumps to 150Wh/h).
So far less than 24 hours of work has completed at least 18 trial factors in the M35732xxxx, 2^65 to 2^66 range (its capacity is greater as I had not all four cores running, for 12 of these hours, only the one was operating, quietly). All four are running now and if I mount this on the wall, it is virtually inaudible and warm to the touch. If anyone has any suggestions as to best measuring the output performance of mprime on this machine, I'd be glad to run it (I'll even hook up my Kill-A-Watt equivalent device to measure energy consumption). |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
13×89 Posts |
My Gigabyte Brix (GB-BXi5-4200) showed up from Amazon today. Tomorrow I will build it and attach it to the TV. then I will run Prime95 on it :)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD vs Intel | dtripp | Software | 3 | 2013-02-19 20:20 |
| Intel NUC | nucleon | Hardware | 2 | 2012-05-10 23:53 |
| Intel RNG API? | R.D. Silverman | Programming | 19 | 2011-09-17 01:43 |
| AMD or Intel | mack | Information & Answers | 7 | 2009-09-13 01:48 |
| Intel Mac? | penguain | NFSNET Discussion | 0 | 2006-06-12 01:31 |