![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2013
41 Posts |
I got assignment from mersenner.org, and just now within 18mins, I completed it by mfaktc 0.20.
Then how to submit this job M106387019? (I got no factor.) What is the format which is recognized by mersenner.org? Thank you guys, |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
mfkatc normally writes its results to a results.txt file. E.g.
Code:
no factor for M65055911 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Sep 2013
41 Posts |
Quote:
Right, I had just pasted this style from my results.txt before I posted here. But I got "0" in all line whereas "no factor" should be found as 1. Can you advise me what is going on? and how to solve it? Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Sep 2013
4110 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Sep 2013
1010012 Posts |
And just within 10 mins, I completed two other jobs: no factor for M6xxxxxxxx from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] I pasted them into manual_result, but all "0" returned. Should it return 2 lines containing "no factor"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
The bitlevels HAS TO BE contiguous. If the exponent was done to 68 before, then you MUST do (and report) 68-69, and so on. Otherwise we lose track, and also, you do futile work in case a factor would be found at a lower bitlevel (keep in mind that each bitlevel take DOUBLE amount of time comparing with the previous bitlevel). How did you get 73-74 assignment? If you play with bitlevels, it is normal to get zero credit...
If you get assignment from 68 to 74, that is a different story, please check your result.txt files and report ALL lines from inside. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2013-09-16 at 16:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Sep 2013
41 Posts |
Quote:
But I got the assignment from mersenne.org Also you can see the jobs which are extracted from my account: Quote:
Last fiddled with by fairsky on 2013-09-16 at 16:18 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Sep 2013
41 Posts |
btw:
I only reported *ONE* mfaktc 0.20 job successfully, see here: Quote:
So, when I tried to report M6xxxxxxx, I got nothing correctly like M334xxxxx returned. Then I don't know where was the problem! Last fiddled with by fairsky on 2013-09-16 at 16:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
Those are all valid TF assignments to "sheng" assuming you are that person. All assignments are 73 to 74 EXCEPT the last one, which should be 68 to 69.
Are you saying that you are trying to report 106xxxxxx to 69 and the server is not giving you credit? P.S. Nobody is accusing you of cheating, I am very sorry if my post could be interpreted as such. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Sep 2013
41 Posts |
Quote:
Also, I understood you have said. So don't worry about the possible offense. I may make mistake after all, since I don't think I understood well the instructions sometimes. My problem is, after I submit the result (I just copy+paste it from my results.txt, and I did this for M334xxxxx and it was recognized.): I got the feedback in my browser: Quote:
I suppose to see the line "Mfaktc no factor lines found: 1" And then, like M334xxxxxx, the successfully reported exponent will be removed from my account. But, nothing expected really happened after M334xxxxx. Then I just hang on here looking for instructions, and leaving my other results in my pc. At last, I hope my statement on my problem is clear for examine. Thanks all. Last fiddled with by fairsky on 2013-09-16 at 16:38 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
12CF16 Posts |
Quote:
Is the result line the first one, or there is a blank line/EOL before? Luigi |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| i am new. How to manually test an exponent from 2^76 and up | king | Information & Answers | 6 | 2018-02-08 14:28 |
| Automatic submit results + fetch assignments for mfaktc? | DuskFalls | GPU Computing | 5 | 2017-12-02 00:34 |
| 100M exponent FFT size? | NookieN | Information & Answers | 3 | 2017-09-04 22:11 |
| overclocking an i7-2600 to finish an 100M exponent in less than a year :) | emily | Hardware | 4 | 2013-02-28 20:11 |
| 100M exponent idea | MrOzzy | Information & Answers | 40 | 2008-11-12 10:19 |