mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Hobbies > Chess > Game 2 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Toxic Geckos

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-09-01, 18:53   #1
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default Move 7

As expected, we have a queen-bishop battery on the c1-h6 diagonal to contend with.

The natural developing move 7...Nge7 can be answered with 8.Bh6 and White can then whip up a dangerous attack on our king by throwing their h pawn forward, assuming we castle kingside which we are likely to want to do.

Paul has been recommending that we counter this plan with 7...h5. I have a lot of affinity with this, even though it's an unusual move. I've succumbed too often to the aforementioned kingside attack when I've played the Black side of this opening before, and a move like 7...h5 sets our own terms rather than let White have it all their own way.

Still, 7...h5 has its disadvantages too. One problem with the move is that it doesn't develop anything, and we're still in the opening. Another is that we weaken our g5 square where White may plant an annoying knight or bishop.

So we have an important decision to make this move.
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-09-01, 21:57   #2
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

51916 Posts
Default

At this point, I like Rb8 with the intention of Nd4 and b5 (not necessarily in that order) developing our queenside attack/powerbase. I think we can keep our g knight in place for a bit.

I'm not in favor of moving the h pawn yet since we lose pace and don't keep our attention on the center.
richs is online now  
Old 2013-09-02, 09:35   #3
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23·3·5·72 Posts
Default

I am with richs. It is obviously possible to defend against white's kingside attack otherwise so many people would try to avoid it rather than let it happen. In a normal game there are lots of opportunities for mistakes which means I think I would prefer something like h5 then but we have 4 people to check for errors.
Instead of defending we can start mobilizing our queenside.
henryzz is online now  
Old 2013-09-02, 17:28   #4
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

3,739 Posts
Default

The knight on g8 is stopping the exchange of black square bishops.

I like Rb8 too, gearing up for a queen side pawn attack. :smile:
paulunderwood is offline  
Old 2013-09-02, 23:31   #5
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

7...Rb8 is fine by me too.
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-09-04, 09:37   #6
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

Three people are explicitly advocating 7...Rb8 then. The other is implicitly doing so too.

Should we discuss any other moves, or should we play it?

Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2013-09-04 at 09:39
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-09-04, 10:10   #7
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23×3×5×72 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Brian-E;351839]Three people are explicitly advocating 7...Rb8 then. The other is implicitly doing so too.

Should we discuss any other moves, or should we play it?[/QUOTE]
Sounds like we should play it.
henryzz is online now  
 



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 1 2016-10-25 18:03
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 5 2016-10-22 01:55
Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-10-05 15:50
Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-09-28 19:51
Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-09-19 19:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 19:48.


Fri Jul 16 19:48:16 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 17:35, 1 user, load averages: 1.41, 2.44, 2.59

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.