mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > New To GIMPS? Start Here! > Information & Answers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-07-18, 09:01   #1
Unregistered
 

672 Posts
Default Inspired

How long does it take for the number to be checked in Prime95 if I have a number and would like to check it whether i'm correct. The largest is 58millions so I would like to put that exponent in Prime95 what is the expected time to run it on average i5 3.40GHz Windows 7 x64, and whether only one number can be check at once on one computer?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-18, 09:19   #2
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

2×1,303 Posts
Default

at this speed, one core working on one exponent (around 58 million) will take 20 to 22 day of work.
If you use 2 core, the time almost half : 13 to 16 days. If you add more more, the overall speed increase but not as much.
It is recommended, however to run only on real core.
below are example of runtime for a i5 2600, one core running

exponent;status; date of delivery ; time it took in days; residue; credit granted
Code:
50831701	C	2013-07-02 13:54	18.5	FCF5DE6D806489__	 93.1209
52023353	C	2013-06-19 19:28	18.8	81B92623E1A14C__	 99.6663
58692583	C	2012-12-16 07:53	20.6	C90E557C07CA47__	 124.3957
58957663	C	2012-12-16 12:49	20.8	11A45916ACE34E__	 130.9761
58957559	C	2012-12-16 14:14	20.9	A88D24DE34D16E__	 130.9759
59189587	C	2012-12-16 14:46	20.9	E3424E1FED28D8__	 131.4913
53626039	C	2013-04-04 15:43	21.5	BBA38A09F3694A__	 102.7367
51474433	C	2013-01-01 23:31	21.9	D8BC6CCBB9F1DE__	 94.2983
51497723	C	2013-01-01 23:59	21.9	45A8D568F02858__	 94.3410
57522991	C	2013-07-07 04:17	21.9	4682053E0FEC57__	 121.9168
51502453	C	2013-01-01 23:09	21.9	576D9D46CFBC7A__	 94.3496
57235931	C	2013-03-16 16:10	22.2	5446092C561E11__	 121.3084
51881251	C	2013-06-05 12:10	22.4	A27F388763E8BB__	 99.3940
58753129	C	2013-06-19 01:40	22.5	70D014BCF740F9__	 124.5240
52874599	C	2013-01-20 06:59	22.6	5CA6E6DC24B8A9__	 101.2971
58370539	C	2013-03-27 06:04	22.8	45003CAE7727E9__	 123.7131
54862487	C	2013-02-08 01:59	22.8	E919CEDB8D9A70__	 108.3915
54882799	C	2013-02-08 02:35	22.8	15ADF837E1A9D7__	 108.4316
59485639	C	2013-02-27 00:41	23.0	BF8B5539B772C0__	 132.1490
59634511	C	2013-07-02 13:13	23.0	EDB7F8F2014D39__	 132.4797
60663727	C	2013-02-27 08:57	23.4	0761FA123C3599__	 134.7662
53666939	C	2013-01-03 05:01	23.9	D8A5223B558454__	 102.8150
55696189	C	2013-02-08 09:43	23.9	79C02E28FCA470__	 118.0450
60994027	C	2013-03-18 16:50	24.0	DF747652C15C12__	 135.4999
56485783	C	2013-01-21 09:17	25.0	B95751148F7E5F__	 119.7185
56258959	C	2013-01-21 08:52	25.0	2DDFD2D900A622__	 119.2377
56228269	C	2013-01-21 07:51	25.0	0A196C7EC8EF9F__	 119.1727
53882251	C	2013-05-22 05:14	25.1	8EF79BB82468A1__	 106.4549
51068729	C	2013-04-16 08:45	25.2	DD51D02021114A__	 93.5551
61493321	C	2013-03-09 06:09	26.5	EB97C8D59F337C__	 144.4559
60644209	C	2013-04-29 09:07	26.6	06738331905537__	 134.7228
59104229	C	2013-05-02 10:00	27.8	E4155837D4D40C__	 131.3017
59808263	C	2013-06-01 01:01	28.4	3BBADC39CB3915__	 132.8657
61252231	C	2013-06-14 08:03	28.6	81F594798847A0__	 143.8896
58464271	C	2013-02-15 13:42	30.0	0884373D0CE11B__	 123.9118
61516321	C	2013-05-24 23:52	31.0	BC93337A816EB1__	 144.5100
62553431	C	2013-05-08 20:49	32.0	984467F8511053__	 146.9463
61933561	C	2013-04-13 10:18	32.7	D4FC878EB1B449__	 145.4901
There is some iregularility; but it will give you an idea of the speed.

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2013-07-18 at 09:33
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-18, 09:20   #3
chappy
 
chappy's Avatar
 
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA

13×89 Posts
Default

I'd bet Firejuggler gives you a better answer at the same time I'm typing this, but why don't you just fire the number up in prime95 and then wait a reasonable amount of time (say 30 minutes) then under the "test" menu there is a Status option which will give an approximate completion date. If you have a decent 4 core machine and set all cores running on the one number it will take a couple weeks. (I'm speculating.)
chappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-18, 16:43   #4
Unregistered
 

25·32·31 Posts
Default

Thank you guys, so the virtual computer that GIMPS is running is not minimalizing the time, am I correct? and is there an official list of numbers that people already checked at least once?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2013-07-21, 05:09   #5
markr
 
markr's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Feb 2003
Sydney

10001111012 Posts
Default

The aim is to maximise throughput rather than the time taken for each workunit.

The server has a database of results, assignments etc. If you visit www.mersenne.org and expand the section of the menu on the left labelled Results Queries, you can run various reports where you can put in an exponent or a range.
markr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



All times are UTC. The time now is 21:56.


Fri Aug 6 21:56:24 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:25, 1 user, load averages: 3.40, 3.05, 2.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.