mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Msieve

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2018-07-18, 14:05   #1420
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11·281 Posts
Default C178

We have several candidate polys to test sieve for the C178. I’m assuming everyone has finished searching? I’ll do test sieving later this week.

As to additional work, I have several GNFS type composites in the 188-190 range but they each need partial (~0.5) t60 run first, i.e. I got nuthin.
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-18, 15:33   #1421
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

15758 Posts
Default C178 polys

Quote:
Originally Posted by swellman View Post
We have several candidate polys to test sieve for the C178. I’m assuming everyone has finished searching? I’ll do test sieving later this week.

As to additional work, I have several GNFS type composites in the 188-190 range but they each need partial (~0.5) t60 run first, i.e. I got nuthin.
I'll run a bulk CADO optimization on all candidates with E above 1e-13. You'll probably have some improvement on some of them by midday Friday.
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-18, 19:26   #1422
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11×281 Posts
Default

Thank you Max. Sounds good!
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-23, 21:26   #1423
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

19×47 Posts
Default C178 polys

I didn't find anything better than E = 1.193e-13, sorry.
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-24, 00:21   #1424
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11·281 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Max0526 View Post
I didn't find anything better than E = 1.193e-13, sorry.
Thanks Max. That poly by Gimarel proved to be a winner, especially with 3 LP on the algebraic side. Characterizing it now, will post it sometime tomorrow.

Aliquot sequence 3366 has a C196 cofactor that is currently being ECM’d by yoyo up through t60. Should be done by late next week if folks are looking for a next GNFS target.
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-25, 02:15   #1425
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

3,389 Posts
Default C173 Poly

I have an OPN number ready for NFS. It would normally be considered for SNFS because the difficulty is about 239. With an exponent of 19, these are better sieved on the -a side. Still, it is a 32-bit job for 14e. I am hoping, with a really good poly, this could be shoe horned into a 31-bit GNFS job for the 14e queue.

3867675755483^19-1
Code:
n: 17091144404057182526808435052712333380560284935301487306675211495551817989135893565600385540258585226003866292895782708444388831056595759837645167391205220793744645983786599
I'll take 1-2M.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-25, 15:40   #1426
swellman
 
swellman's Avatar
 
Jun 2012

11·281 Posts
Default C173

I’ll be happy to help, but starting the effort will have to wait until some electrical work on my house is completed. Unsteady power while the electrician does his thing. Should be over by Monday.

Reserving 3-4M.
swellman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-25, 19:12   #1427
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

19·47 Posts
Default polyselect stage 1 question

I am sorry for posting it here, please refer me to the correct thread.

For a composite number n
Code:
n: 178840658547056398340661035575701801836589428489697812907837151638999043827732425417122362163295769975015657207507501412348850500995123605989554924733
and a module m1
Code:
m1: 77972851604033576932147301042208297167089808387024826713877498412713003039299041150987999294960402131018323564915377911651481766718632966635527763373
there exists a pair of (small) integers Y0 and Y1
Code:
Y0: -135858192307790840273969982972
Y1: 570849297736093
such that Y0 and Y1 can be used instead of m1, because
Code:
m1 = -Y0/Y1 mod n
I need to change the module to m2, m3, m4, and m5.
Code:
m2: 67047611475527282028037472437033488695089016240828896923379148834946058660177028494822752491424788233958196885277392148625303965906549424801644974992
m3: 111017471840654252200329108609908409127753430184477403583875663426566104676686520668738357823163330085395810708538692488780859948394461777982154709615
m4: 121279539261425493119920629465732455170326965790648352435420959581656047635052464730404054806274369280885771421718875648266735969599540314423373943177
m5: 5892545913983215686386404616596609555524647347312629057159864063118414958270401829793469076372922231244647819270503633352967621419209599900062563763
Is there any cost-effective way to find a new (small) pair of Y0 and Y1 for each of m2..m5.
If it helps, all of m1..m5 and n are factored on factordb.com.
Any advice is really appreciated.

Edit: Also, is there a way to find a different coprime pair Y0 and Y1 for m1?

Last fiddled with by Max0526 on 2018-07-25 at 19:19
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-25, 20:20   #1428
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

89310 Posts
Default polyselect stage 1

The quintic poly for the question above is
Code:
c0: 1643980082281399683050813997173432365
c1: 5927315077145304592680838374047
c2: 1141628259420241069559409
c3: -1020260890681555799
c4: -33414674686
c5: 3864
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-27, 05:20   #1429
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

D3D16 Posts
Default C173 Poly

Initial baseline.
Code:
N: 17091144404057182526808435052712333380560284935301487306675211495551817989135893565600385540258585226003866292895782708444388831056595759837645167391205220793744645983786599
# expecting poly E from 2.27e-13 to > 2.61e-13
R0: -1738090497459750195898936653501944
R1: 2146814785490243
A0: 46181464502919860836995378136577256668853
A1: -94050063041537378096483400233223331
A2: 1698218502294420613255801753
A3: -16720100425522195909
A4: 51248834906034
A5: 1077480
skew 16673018.44, size 7.630e-17, alpha -7.486, combined = 2.435e-13 rroots = 3
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-07-27, 19:42   #1430
Max0526
 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto

11011111012 Posts
Default C173

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
Initial baseline.
Code:
N: 17091144404057182526808435052712333380560284935301487306675211495551817989135893565600385540258585226003866292895782708444388831056595759837645167391205220793744645983786599
# expecting poly E from 2.27e-13 to > 2.61e-13
R0: -1738090497459750195898936653501944
R1: 2146814785490243
A0: 46181464502919860836995378136577256668853
A1: -94050063041537378096483400233223331
A2: 1698218502294420613255801753
A3: -16720100425522195909
A4: 51248834906034
A5: 1077480
 skew 16673018.44, size 7.630e-17, alpha -7.486, combined = 2.435e-13 rroots = 3
It's a very solid baseline, only 6% below the current record. I can't spin it up.
I started CADO on this C173, I'll do 0-500K.
Max0526 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GIMPS wiki account request thread ixfd64 mersennewiki 169 2018-09-21 05:43
Polynomial Discriminant is n^k for an n-1 degree polynomial carpetpool Miscellaneous Math 14 2017-02-18 19:46
Lost Prime Raider password request thread cheesehead Forum Feedback 6 2009-07-28 13:02
Polynomial R.D. Silverman NFSNET Discussion 13 2005-09-16 20:07
Deutscher Thread (german thread) TauCeti NFSNET Discussion 0 2003-12-11 22:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:55.


Fri Aug 6 04:55:33 UTC 2021 up 13 days, 23:24, 1 user, load averages: 2.62, 2.53, 2.85

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.