|
2013-07-04, 16:04
|
#1 |
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2×859 Posts |
Move 35
Following my analysis in Move 34, I suggest Nd4.
|
|
|
2013-07-04, 21:51
|
#2 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
1100110011102 Posts |
35.Nd4 is fine by me too.
I think we should then resign if they play 35...Bxd4 (if 36.cxd4 Re2), but we cannot prevent ruinous material losses anyway. Last fiddled with by Brian-E on 2013-07-04 at 21:55 |
|
|
|
2013-07-05, 00:08
|
#3 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2·859 Posts |
Let's see what David says about this move, and we can regroup about resigning after their next move.
|
|
|
|
2013-07-05, 11:57
|
#4 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
Nd4 is fine with me.
|
|
|
|
2013-07-05, 14:29
|
#5 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2×11×149 Posts |
Ready to play the move then?:smile:
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |
