mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Hobbies > Chess > Game 1 - ♔♕♙♘♖♙ - Toxic Geckos

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-05-15, 20:13   #1
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7×467 Posts
Default Move 29

It would seem that there are just two possible squares to which our attacked queen can move. And 29.Qc1 Re2+ 30.Kf1 Bd3, or 30.Kg1 Bg4 looks pretty dreadful.
So is 29.Qf2 practically the only reasonable move?
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-05-15, 21:57   #2
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23×3×5×72 Posts
Default

It certainly looks that way to me.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2013-05-15, 22:54   #3
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

I think our position after 29.Qf2 Re3 is miserable: we can't play 30.Bxb5 Be4, so and we're just waiting to see how they invade. But I think the queen is better on f2 than c1.
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-05-16, 22:17   #4
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

63058 Posts
Default

Perhaps "miserable" is too negative. Let's say "challenging" instead. Salvaging a draw from this will be a great achievement if we can pull it off.:smile:
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-05-18, 00:38   #5
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

32·5·29 Posts
Default

I was too hasty in my use of the word "blunder" last move. Mea culpa....

I think Qf2 is our best defensive move right now vs. Qc1. We still may be able to pull out a draw if we keep at it.
richs is offline  
Old 2013-05-18, 14:17   #6
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

Does that mean that we have a majority for 29.Qf2 already? Or am I being too hasty in saying that?
Brian-E is offline  
Old 2013-05-18, 23:37   #7
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

133708 Posts
Default

I suspect so. I will post tomorrow if there are no new ideas.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2013-05-19, 14:11   #8
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

51916 Posts
Default

Please give me another day or two to look further at Qc1. Thanks, guys!
richs is offline  
Old 2013-05-19, 21:39   #9
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

23·3·5·72 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=richs;340946]Please give me another day or two to look further at Qc1. Thanks, guys![/QUOTE]
Ok. If I forget please feel free to post when you are ready. I am in the middle of exam season which leaves me likely to forget things.
henryzz is offline  
Old 2013-05-21, 18:21   #10
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

32·5·29 Posts
Default

I looked further at Qc1 and it's much worse than Qf2, so I think we're ready to proceed with Qf2. I can post if you stay busy with finals, David.
richs is offline  
Old 2013-05-21, 19:07   #11
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

With David probably under far too much exam pressure, I suggest we can just anticipate his actions and play the move. I'll post 29.Qf2.
Brian-E is offline  
 

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 1 2016-10-25 18:03
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 5 2016-10-22 01:55
Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-10-05 15:50
Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-09-28 19:51
Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" MooMoo2 Other Chess Games 0 2016-09-19 19:56

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:54.


Fri Jul 16 18:54:55 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 16:42, 1 user, load averages: 2.46, 2.80, 3.60

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.