Treading LL P-1 for 100M TF - Page 4

chalsall · 2013-04-04, 17:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

Edit: Yeah, looked that up, hundreds would be hectos, not centis.

Under the SI standard, yes. I was using the financial space; e.g. "C Note".

Sorry for the confusion -- that graph didn't have enough room for more than a single character. Same for the top two graphs, where I use a "K" to mean "Thousand".

Aramis Wyler · 2013-04-04, 19:08

It's a fun thing to use roman numerals/American slang for one part of the page and SI for others - keeps the page happenin'. I would humbly ask though that the 'C's be replaced with 'H' to represent the hectos (or hundreds!) Or that the 'K' be replaced with 'M's for thousands.

Replacing the 'C's with 'B's for 'Benjaimins' also came to mind, and then 'G's for 'Grands', because that's super hot. I'm just afraid it would be difficult to decipher.

chalsall · 2013-04-04, 19:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

It's a fun thing to use roman numerals/American slang for one part of the page and SI for others - keeps the page happenin'. I would humbly ask though that the 'C's be replaced with 'H' to represent the hectos (or hundreds!) Or that the 'K' be replaced with 'M's for thousands.

One of the reasons I enjoy working for you guys is you always keep me on my toes...

It turns out there's just enough room for "(C)" to be replaced with "(100s)", and "(K)" to be replaced with "(1000s)". At least for the English versions of the strings -- I haven't yet checked the other languages.

Satisfactory? Or is another solution more optimal?

kracker · 2013-04-04, 19:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

One of the reasons I enjoy working for you guys is you always keep me on my toes...

It turns out there's just enough room for "(C)" to be replaced with "(100s)", and "(K)" to be replaced with "(1000s)". At least for the English versions of the strings -- I haven't yet checked the other languages.

Satisfactory? Or is another solution more optimal?

Aramis Wyler · 2013-04-04, 19:58

Would be easier to follow. :)

bcp19 · 2013-04-04, 21:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler

It's a fun thing to use roman numerals/American slang for one part of the page and SI for others - keeps the page happenin'. I would humbly ask though that the 'C's be replaced with 'H' to represent the hectos (or hundreds!) Or that the 'K' be replaced with 'M's for thousands.

Replacing the 'C's with 'B's for 'Benjaimins' also came to mind, and then 'G's for 'Grands', because that's super hot. I'm just afraid it would be difficult to decipher.

C does = 100 in Roman Numerals, but then you'd have to do M for 1000.

chalsall · 2013-04-04, 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp19

C does = 100 in Roman Numerals, but then you'd have to do M for 1000.

We geeks regularly use MB (Million Bytes); Mb (Million bits)... "M" didn't work for me for thousands...

I think we've found an acceptable solution.

Uncwilly · 2013-04-05, 00:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by kracker

Uncwilly now owes you 36.267 days of P-1 work!

So I am now at 21 GHz-days. And stage 1 found a factor that is in the 83 bit range.

Aramis Wyler · 2013-04-05, 01:43

Sweet! :-D I'll through another one on to 79 for tommorow. :)

davieddy · 2013-04-05, 01:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Meanwhile, over the same 30 day period, Primenet has averaged 168.1 LL completions a day -- over the last 7 days the average has been 183.1 LL completions a day.

Why are you too stupid to interpret your own data properly?

There are currently about 300 LL completions a day. (V good news).
By using the change in total one-LLs, you have carelessly subtracted the DCs done.

Good to note that TF to 73 is keeping pace with this. 74 bits looks a bit premature ATM tho.

D

Aramis Wyler · 2013-04-05, 02:00

Code:

 
Number    | Work  | Range | Date Reserved    | GHzD/D
332310091 | LL TF | 73-79 | 2013-04-05 01:55 | 362.67

@David - We haven't entirely moved to 74 yet, as the 73s aren't done in the 63M range yet. Almost though. Another couple days.

2013-04-05, 01:43	#42
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 110101000₂ Posts	Sweet! :-D I'll through another one on to 79 for tommorow. :) Last fiddled with by Aramis Wyler on 2013-04-05 at 02:06

2013-04-05, 02:00	#44
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2³×53 Posts	Code: Number \| Work \| Range \| Date Reserved \| GHzD/D 332310091 \| LL TF \| 73-79 \| 2013-04-05 01:55 \| 362.67 @David - We haven't entirely moved to 74 yet, as the 73s aren't done in the 63M range yet. Almost though. Another couple days. Last fiddled with by Aramis Wyler on 2013-04-05 at 02:07

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
To 100M to 75 Bits	petrw1	GPU to 72	6	2017-04-17 04:03
Is LMH > 100M still alive?	TheMawn	LMH > 100M	25	2016-04-18 16:11
100m p-1 and tf	aurashift	Software	18	2016-04-14 13:48
Anyone working in 79.3M - 100M ??	markr	Lone Mersenne Hunters	21	2008-12-21 16:02
100M madness	stars10250	Hardware	8	2008-10-02 15:21

2013-04-04, 19:08	#35
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 650₈ Posts	It's a fun thing to use roman numerals/American slang for one part of the page and SI for others - keeps the page happenin'. I would humbly ask though that the 'C's be replaced with 'H' to represent the hectos (or hundreds!) Or that the 'K' be replaced with 'M's for thousands. Replacing the 'C's with 'B's for 'Benjaimins' also came to mind, and then 'G's for 'Grands', because that's super hot. I'm just afraid it would be difficult to decipher.

2013-04-04, 19:58	#38
Aramis Wyler "Bill Staffen" Jan 2013 Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2³×53 Posts	Would be easier to follow. :)