mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-04-14, 17:33   #89
Chuck
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
May 2011
Orange Park, FL

25·29 Posts
Default

Please make it use a worktodo file to stage work.
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-14, 21:20   #90
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

1101011111002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by owftheevil View Post
Cudapm1 output:

Code:
M61076737 has a factor: 432634830991289176546683053423
Run with B1 = 65000, B2 = 12035000, n = 3360k, d = 2310, e =2, 8 rp per pass. It used about 600Mb of device memory. Stage 2 took ~53 minutes.

Edit: Looks like about 15 minutes longer to make e = 4.
To compare with CPU speed running the same curve in Prime95.
Laptop with Corei7 2720QM sandy bridge:
using 1 core: stage1 43min, stage2 ~ 8h (3 Gb RAM)
using 4 cores: stage1: 19 min, stage2 ~ 3.8h (3 Gb RAM)

I only completed ~20% of stage2 and extrapolated the runtime.

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2013-04-14 at 21:22
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-15, 01:11   #91
owftheevil
 
owftheevil's Avatar
 
"Carl Darby"
Oct 2012
Spring Mountains, Nevada

32×5×7 Posts
Default

I've been thinking about the numbers and it seems that 53m for stage 2 is faster than possible. I have a strong suspicion that there is an extra or missing factor of 2 in the code causing only half the rps to get processed. Off to look for it.
owftheevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-15, 01:19   #92
owftheevil
 
owftheevil's Avatar
 
"Carl Darby"
Oct 2012
Spring Mountains, Nevada

32×5×7 Posts
Default

Found it. Sorry about the false expectations.
owftheevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-15, 05:11   #93
kladner
 
kladner's Avatar
 
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!

1015810 Posts
Default

It is interesting to watch the process of things getting worked out.

Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-04-15 at 05:14
kladner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-15, 08:52   #94
NBtarheel_33
 
NBtarheel_33's Avatar
 
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA

5×223 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by owftheevil View Post
Found it. Sorry about the false expectations.
53 minutes, 106 minutes, still a huge improvement over CPU P-1!
NBtarheel_33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-15, 09:03   #95
NBtarheel_33
 
NBtarheel_33's Avatar
 
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA

5·223 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramis Wyler View Post
Though it's hard to trade 25x p-1 work for 125x factoring work.
Factoring to 7x bits (assuming an increase of one bit level) gives you (roughly) a 1/7x = 1.27-1.43% chance of finding a factor.

P-1 with decent bounds will typically give you a 5-8% chance of finding a factor.

So, given 125 TF attempts, we'd expect roughly 1.6-1.8 factors found. On the other hand, 25 TF attempts should yield roughly 1.25-2.0 factors found.

If GPU P-1 allows us to increase bounds or make more frequent use of the Brent-Suyama extension, the expected number of successes will be at or above the higher end of this range. In that case, it would make complete sense to trade 125x TF for 25x P-1.

Note also that GPU P-1 will make use of the *GPU* RAM, rather than the system RAM. This could bring in P-1'ers who were previously unable to dedicate large quantities of RAM to Stage 2.
NBtarheel_33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-16, 18:56   #96
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

53208 Posts
Default

P-1 with 2GB memory in the 61M range gives a probability of success of 3.3-3.6% depending on the TF level. Dunno where you got 5-8%.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-16, 20:55   #97
NBtarheel_33
 
NBtarheel_33's Avatar
 
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA

5×223 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
P-1 with 2GB memory in the 61M range gives a probability of success of 3.3-3.6% depending on the TF level. Dunno where you got 5-8%.
OK, probably won't see 8% unless you're a fan of strong P-1 with high B1 and B2, but one doesn't have to stretch too much to see 5%...

From James' site (http://mersenne.ca):

M61000000, factored to 70 bits, assuming 2 L-L tests saved, with B1=670,000 and B2=16,750,000, using K*B^N+C = 1*2^61000000-1
Probability = 5.664070%

M65000000, factored to 70 bits, with B1=800,000 and B2=24,000,000, using K*B^N+C = 1*2^65000000-1
Probability = 6.224824%
NBtarheel_33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-17, 00:25   #98
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22·2,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
P-1 with 2GB memory in the 61M range gives a probability of success of 3.3-3.6% depending on the TF level. Dunno where you got 5-8%.
I have seeing Prime95 giving around 3.75% for 60M exponents that have been taken to 73.
Uncwilly is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-17, 00:56   #99
c10ck3r
 
c10ck3r's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Kansas

54710 Posts
Default

Any luck getting Winbloze compiled? Once it's compiled and available, I'll reinstall my 460 to play with it :)
c10ck3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mfaktc: a CUDA program for Mersenne prefactoring TheJudger GPU Computing 3628 2023-04-17 22:08
World's second-dumbest CUDA program fivemack Programming 112 2015-02-12 22:51
World's dumbest CUDA program? xilman Programming 1 2009-11-16 10:26
Factoring program need help Citrix Lone Mersenne Hunters 8 2005-09-16 02:31
Factoring program ET_ Programming 3 2003-11-25 02:57

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:19.


Fri Jul 7 15:19:02 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 12:47, 0 users, load averages: 1.08, 1.11, 1.11

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔