![]() |
|
|
#89 |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
25·29 Posts |
Please make it use a worktodo file to stage work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
1101011111002 Posts |
Quote:
Laptop with Corei7 2720QM sandy bridge: using 1 core: stage1 43min, stage2 ~ 8h (3 Gb RAM) using 4 cores: stage1: 19 min, stage2 ~ 3.8h (3 Gb RAM) I only completed ~20% of stage2 and extrapolated the runtime. Last fiddled with by ATH on 2013-04-14 at 21:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
"Carl Darby"
Oct 2012
Spring Mountains, Nevada
32×5×7 Posts |
I've been thinking about the numbers and it seems that 53m for stage 2 is faster than possible. I have a strong suspicion that there is an extra or missing factor of 2 in the code causing only half the rps to get processed. Off to look for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
"Carl Darby"
Oct 2012
Spring Mountains, Nevada
32×5×7 Posts |
Found it. Sorry about the false expectations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
1015810 Posts |
It is interesting to watch the process of things getting worked out.
![]()
Last fiddled with by kladner on 2013-04-15 at 05:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5×223 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 | |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5·223 Posts |
Quote:
P-1 with decent bounds will typically give you a 5-8% chance of finding a factor. So, given 125 TF attempts, we'd expect roughly 1.6-1.8 factors found. On the other hand, 25 TF attempts should yield roughly 1.25-2.0 factors found. If GPU P-1 allows us to increase bounds or make more frequent use of the Brent-Suyama extension, the expected number of successes will be at or above the higher end of this range. In that case, it would make complete sense to trade 125x TF for 25x P-1. Note also that GPU P-1 will make use of the *GPU* RAM, rather than the system RAM. This could bring in P-1'ers who were previously unable to dedicate large quantities of RAM to Stage 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
53208 Posts |
P-1 with 2GB memory in the 61M range gives a probability of success of 3.3-3.6% depending on the TF level. Dunno where you got 5-8%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
"Nathan"
Jul 2008
Maryland, USA
5×223 Posts |
Quote:
From James' site (http://mersenne.ca): M61000000, factored to 70 bits, assuming 2 L-L tests saved, with B1=670,000 and B2=16,750,000, using K*B^N+C = 1*2^61000000-1 Probability = 5.664070% M65000000, factored to 70 bits, with B1=800,000 and B2=24,000,000, using K*B^N+C = 1*2^65000000-1 Probability = 6.224824% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22·2,767 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Aug 2010
Kansas
54710 Posts |
Any luck getting Winbloze compiled? Once it's compiled and available, I'll reinstall my 460 to play with it :)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mfaktc: a CUDA program for Mersenne prefactoring | TheJudger | GPU Computing | 3628 | 2023-04-17 22:08 |
| World's second-dumbest CUDA program | fivemack | Programming | 112 | 2015-02-12 22:51 |
| World's dumbest CUDA program? | xilman | Programming | 1 | 2009-11-16 10:26 |
| Factoring program need help | Citrix | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 8 | 2005-09-16 02:31 |
| Factoring program | ET_ | Programming | 3 | 2003-11-25 02:57 |