![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
17FD16 Posts |
I think that is what we need to play. We need to keep trying to find a good way out of the pickle we are in.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
17FD16 Posts |
How about:
18. Qc2 exd4 19. Rbd1 Nd5 20. Qxd4 |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
May 2003
7·13·17 Posts |
Alternatively,
18. Qc2 dxe4 (I've had e and d backwards for some reason) henryzz: lol I copied bits from you and never noticed 19. Rbd1 Nd5 20. Qxe4 Nxe3 21. Qxe3 and we seem to be in a strong position. if instead 20. ... Nxf4? 21. Qxb7 Last fiddled with by henryzz on 2013-02-02 at 21:50 |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
May 2003
154710 Posts |
Looks like henryzz and I are on the same page. Those moves look very good to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
Zeta-Flux, I think you've found a much better plan, playing a rook to d1 before we recapture the pawn on e4.
The line you give starting 18.Qc2 dxe4 19.Rbd1 Nd5 allows us to play 20.Qxe4! and I think we're winning material. We are threatening Rxd5 winning two pieces for a rook, and their tactical trick 20...Nxc3 doesn't seem to work after 21.Qxb7 Nxe2+ 22.Bxe2 with an extra piece. This looks much better! EDIT: just previewed post and seen that you two have also found 20.Qxe4! |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
[QUOTE=Zeta-Flux;327235]Looks like henryzz and I are on the same page. Those moves look very good to me.[/QUOTE]
In comparison at least. I am going to put together a post with all our best move sequences in. I will be editing it as I go along so you can see what I am doing and maybe make suggestions if necessary. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3×23×89 Posts |
18. Qc2 dxe4[LIST][*]19. Bxe4[LIST][*]Bxe4 20. Qxe4 Qd3(maybe Qd5 an option?) 21. Ng3[*]Nd5[LIST][*]20. Rbd1[LIST][*]exf4[LIST][*]20. Bxf4[*]20. Bxd5+ Bxd5 21. Bxf4[/LIST][*]Nxe3 20. Rxd8[LIST][*]R(af)xd8 21. Q(bc)1 Nxf1 22. Bxb7 Nd2[*]Nxc2[LIST][*]21. Rxf8+ (BR)xf8 22. Bxb7[*]21. Rxa8 Bxe4[LIST][*]22. Rxa7[*]22. Rxf8+Bxf8[/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][*]20. Rfd1 Nxe3[LIST][*]21. Qc1 Bxe4 22. Qxe3 Bxb1[*]21. Qa4 Bxe4[/LIST][*]20. Bc1[*]20. Bd2[/LIST][*]Q(cd)7[/LIST][*]19. Rbd1[LIST][*]exf3 looks horrible[*]Nd5[LIST][*]20. Qxe4 [LIST][*]Nxe3 21. Qxe3[*]Nxf4 21. Qxb7[/LIST][*]20. Bxe4[LIST][*]exf4[LIST][*]20. Bxf4[*]20. Bxd5+ Bxd5 21. Bxf4[/LIST][*]Nxe3 20. Rxd8[LIST][*]R(af)xd8 21. Q(bc)1 Nxf1 22. Bxb7 Nd2[*]Nxc2[LIST][*]21. Rxf8+ (BR)xf8 22. Bxb7[*]21. Rxa8 Bxe4[LIST][*]22. Rxa7[*]22. Rxf8+Bxf8[/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][*]Bd5[*]Qc(78) defending bishop and moving queen[/LIST][*]19. Rfd1[LIST][*]exf3 looks horrible[*]Nd5[LIST][*]20. Qxe4 [LIST][*]Nxe3 21. Qxe3[*]Nxf4 21. Qxb7[/LIST][*]20. Bxe4[LIST][*]exf4[LIST][*]20. Bxf4[*]20. Bxd5+ Bxd5 21. Bxf4[/LIST][*]Nxe3 20. Rxd8[LIST][*]R(af)xd8 21. Qc1 Bxe4[*]Nxc2[LIST][*]21. Rxf8+ (BR)xf8 22. Bxb7[*]21. Rxa8 Bxe4[LIST][*]22. Rxa7[*]22. Rxf8+Bxf8[/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][/LIST][*]Bd5[*]Qc(78) defending bishop and moving queen[/LIST][/LIST]
Last fiddled with by henryzz on 2013-02-03 at 17:11 |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
2·11·149 Posts |
[QUOTE=Zeta-Flux;327234]Alternatively,
18. Qc2 dxe4 (I've had e and d backwards for some reason) henryzz: lol I copied bits from you and never noticed 19. Rbd1 Nd5 20. Qxe4 Nxe3 21. Qxe3 and we seem to be in a strong position. if instead 20. ... Nxf4? 21. Qxb7[/QUOTE] Yes, you're right, they'll play 20...Nxe3 and we're not winning material exactly, as I erroneously stated before, but it's indeed a fine position for us. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
614110 Posts |
How do we respond to 18. Qc2 dxe4 19. R(bf)d1 exf3 ?
That looks like a horrible position to have a passed pawn in. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
May 2003
7×13×17 Posts |
If you mean exf4, don't we simply take their queen with our rook? To make up material they then have to sacrifice their passed pawns.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
171810 Posts |
I have to digest this all... May not be until Monday, sorry. Committed to a Super Bowl party on Sunday.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |