Black's 15th move - Page 2

LaurV · 2013-01-25, 01:40

That site is interesting, thanks for the link, especially if what they talk about atmospheric noise is true. Unfortunately, the "together" particle was important, my intention was that the event is visible by all of us. Not the 3 of us involved in the game. I am talking generally, when some people are arguing, then they decide to settle the argument by flipping a coin, they must be - physically or virtually - in the same place, and all of them must see the (same) event in the same time, so no one can cheat on others. Like we would be in a room, throw a coin to the ceiling, then all of us could see what side the coin felt on the floor shows, then the argument is settled.

Dubslow · 2013-01-25, 08:24

Alright alright, I've been outvoted. fxe4 it is. :smile:

Raman · 2013-03-09, 13:34

[QUOTE=Raman;322593]So, science_man_88 is being out of game ?

He got sick of playing this game !

Maybe that he is being tired enough that which it indicates[COLOR=White] , up down so thus thereby
[/COLOR][/QUOTE]

My apologies for writing this in a tone that is insulting. I should have actually written... you have made with this move without consulting him. Of course, that he wasn't showing interest lately in this game, thereby voting for weaker moves, 11...Nb5 move, 12...e5 move, etc. He explicitly mentioned that he doesn't care about the other's voting options, choices selection, in this process, but even then the 12...Bb7 move had got with a clear majority among three players, among the other available moves, 12...f5 move, 12...e5 move, 12...f6 move, ... Maybe that he may develop with furthermore interest in the game later on, back again - onwards.

I am sorry for hurting you. I think that I wrote that message in a rush, and then not looking back at it again, thereby. By "out of game", I clearly, certainly meant that move can be made official, announcing by it, thereby, without consulting him...

[QUOTE=Dubslow;322865]We had a good debate with our last move.[/QUOTE]

It seems that I got into trouble by responding, replying to this post!

[QUOTE=LaurV;322901]Hm.. my quote there looks ugly, out of the context. And I just spotted a typo, "mode forum activity" should be "more forum activity". I was arguing to "someone's" suggestion that the threads should be wiped clean after the game ends, idea which I totally don't like, a lot of good stuff will be lost.

OTOH, what Raman does is quite childish, I would take it like a good joke. "Spying" on the number of posts on the adversary team? C'mon! What info does this show about the game? You don't need to be angry with him for this. He may have other sins (like posting analysis and private discussions on the public, before the game ends, for which I think he took a deserved ban!), but this "james bond" stuff is just a good joke... I used to behave similarly years ago when I was younger :razz:[/QUOTE]

I am being curious enough as to whether there have been some lady members inside, in this forum, thereby ...

[QUOTE=Brian-E;322918]Speaking for myself, I agree with you LaurV that spying on the number of the opposing team's posts is not catastrophic to the integrity of the game, just childish and needs to be stopped. And as far as I have seen, no-one has expressed particular anger about it either. But there was some concern that Raman might have done more than this and actually somehow seen the contents of the Toxic Geckos' private forum, which would of course have affected the integrity of the game. If this isn't the case, then I for one (again, speaking only for myself!) am perfectly happy to continue as before on the basis that the spying stops at once.[/QUOTE]

Looking into opponent's team posts is not being my own intention, it's being a sin. Intention is to track the opponent's team progress over thereby, in this process, it's being good to know whether discussion for the next move has been started or not, whether all players have voted in, whether whom it's turn been waiting for, whether next move is being overdue, i.e. whether it is being on its own way.

For this example, it was being useful enough to know that the 9...O-O move was not being noticed by any of the White's team members, but by this way, the delay waiting had been easily avoided with, in this place!

For the last move, i.e. the white's thirteenth move I wanted to share with you that some activity has been carried out by the supermods, not necessarily playing this game energetically, frenetically in the team's sub-forum, but this discussion would have been better carried out in the private sub forum. I posted in a reply post, as a response to Dubslow's post, and then got into trouble, being my own main point has been not to wipe out team sub forums clean enough, afterwards the game ends ...

[QUOTE=henryzz;322925]Assuming that post counts is all Raman is getting then I am not fussed on how we continue. I would prefer that the other team has enough players to give a good game(assuming he is helpful and they want him back). If they want to add another player as a replacement then that is fine as well. Basically, I want a friendly and competitive game of chess.[/QUOTE]

I will agree with you that the information leakage from within this game, before this game ends, is being a sin, and then I will ensure you that it will not repeat. Let's enjoy playing this game, give you a challenging enough game, but provided that the Demi-Gods should promise me that the team sub forums will not be wiped clean enough, afterwards, later on, being towards after this chess game ends, onwards, to.

[QUOTE=Raman;322862]

It seems that there is some furthermore interesting discussion or debate being going on inside our[COLOR=white] own [/COLOR]
opponent's forum, than our own forum.

Alas, at last some day I will hope to see what is being inside Toxic Geckos forum, threads,
thread names, posts, snapshots, right at after the end of the game, quite directly.

[COLOR=White]You will agree with this move. I will
agree with this move. Posting analysis shortly, factors even enough furthermore succinctly.[/COLOR][/QUOTE] when the game is over, afterwards both sub forums should not be wiped clean
No...I would merge them, all in one, so we could see the "evolution of the hostilities". I mean really mix the posts from here and there, in chronological order, in a single thread, and made accessible for everyone. A lot of people would like to read it (i.e. mode forum activity) me included (may be an opportunity to learn more chess too! beside of the fun) and I don't think we have something to hide, haven't we?
[QUOTE=Raman;322866]... against 12...f5 move, [COLOR="white"]10...Bd7 move, e5 moves, f6 moves, Nf6 moves, Nge7 moves, Nh6 moves, thereby[/COLOR][SUP][/SUP]

Supermods seeming to be playing this game furthermore energetically, frenetically than their own members, thereby.

Likewise they had voted for an inferior move into our own poll system thing, stuff

[url]http://mersenneforum.org/misc.php?do=whoposted&t=17604[/url]

And then tracing by their own behaviour over thereby

When the game is over, afterwards both sub forums should not be wiped clean[/QUOTE]

For what it's being worth, the supermods had been voting for a weaker move 12...f6 move into our own voting poll system, over thereby...

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Black Move S1 (=s0^2-2=14)	LaurV	Game 1 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Shaolin Pirates	36	2013-04-15 13:25
Black's nineteenth move	Raman	Game 1 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Shaolin Pirates	13	2013-02-19 20:28
Black's ∞-th move	LaurV	Game 1 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Shaolin Pirates	10	2012-11-30 20:50
Black's third move	Raman	Game 1 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Shaolin Pirates	4	2012-10-20 19:47
Black's first move	Raman	Game 1 - ♚♛♝♞♜♟ - Shaolin Pirates	12	2012-10-07 19:11

2013-01-25, 01:40	#12
LaurV Romulan Interpreter "name field" Jun 2011 Thailand 10100000110011₂ Posts	That site is interesting, thanks for the link, especially if what they talk about atmospheric noise is true. Unfortunately, the "together" particle was important, my intention was that the event is visible by all of us. Not the 3 of us involved in the game. I am talking generally, when some people are arguing, then they decide to settle the argument by flipping a coin, they must be - physically or virtually - in the same place, and all of them must see the (same) event in the same time, so no one can cheat on others. Like we would be in a room, throw a coin to the ceiling, then all of us could see what side the coin felt on the floor shows, then the argument is settled.

2013-01-25, 08:24	#13
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3·29·83 Posts	Alright alright, I've been outvoted. fxe4 it is. :smile:

2013-03-09, 13:34	#14
Raman Noodles "Mr. Tuch" Dec 2007 Chennai, India 3·419 Posts	[QUOTE=Raman;322593]So, science_man_88 is being out of game ? He got sick of playing this game ! Maybe that he is being tired enough that which it indicates[COLOR=White] , up down so thus thereby [/COLOR][/QUOTE] My apologies for writing this in a tone that is insulting. I should have actually written... you have made with this move without consulting him. Of course, that he wasn't showing interest lately in this game, thereby voting for weaker moves, 11...Nb5 move, 12...e5 move, etc. He explicitly mentioned that he doesn't care about the other's voting options, choices selection, in this process, but even then the 12...Bb7 move had got with a clear majority among three players, among the other available moves, 12...f5 move, 12...e5 move, 12...f6 move, ... Maybe that he may develop with furthermore interest in the game later on, back again - onwards. I am sorry for hurting you. I think that I wrote that message in a rush, and then not looking back at it again, thereby. By "out of game", I clearly, certainly meant that move can be made official, announcing by it, thereby, without consulting him... [QUOTE=Dubslow;322865]We had a good debate with our last move.[/QUOTE] It seems that I got into trouble by responding, replying to this post! [QUOTE=LaurV;322901]Hm.. my quote there looks ugly, out of the context. And I just spotted a typo, "mode forum activity" should be "more forum activity". I was arguing to "someone's" suggestion that the threads should be wiped clean after the game ends, idea which I totally don't like, a lot of good stuff will be lost. OTOH, what Raman does is quite childish, I would take it like a good joke. "Spying" on the number of posts on the adversary team? C'mon! What info does this show about the game? You don't need to be angry with him for this. He may have other sins (like posting analysis and private discussions on the public, before the game ends, for which I think he took a deserved ban!), but this "james bond" stuff is just a good joke... I used to behave similarly years ago when I was younger :razz:[/QUOTE] I am being curious enough as to whether there have been some lady members inside, in this forum, thereby ... [QUOTE=Brian-E;322918]Speaking for myself, I agree with you LaurV that spying on the number of the opposing team's posts is not catastrophic to the integrity of the game, just childish and needs to be stopped. And as far as I have seen, no-one has expressed particular anger about it either. But there was some concern that Raman might have done more than this and actually somehow seen the contents of the Toxic Geckos' private forum, which would of course have affected the integrity of the game. If this isn't the case, then I for one (again, speaking only for myself!) am perfectly happy to continue as before on the basis that the spying stops at once.[/QUOTE] Looking into opponent's team posts is not being my own intention, it's being a sin. Intention is to track the opponent's team progress over thereby, in this process, it's being good to know whether discussion for the next move has been started or not, whether all players have voted in, whether whom it's turn been waiting for, whether next move is being overdue, i.e. whether it is being on its own way. For this example, it was being useful enough to know that the 9...O-O move was not being noticed by any of the White's team members, but by this way, the delay waiting had been easily avoided with, in this place! For the last move, i.e. the white's thirteenth move I wanted to share with you that some activity has been carried out by the supermods, not necessarily playing this game energetically, frenetically in the team's sub-forum, but this discussion would have been better carried out in the private sub forum. I posted in a reply post, as a response to Dubslow's post, and then got into trouble, being my own main point has been not to wipe out team sub forums clean enough, afterwards the game ends ... [QUOTE=henryzz;322925]Assuming that post counts is all Raman is getting then I am not fussed on how we continue. I would prefer that the other team has enough players to give a good game(assuming he is helpful and they want him back). If they want to add another player as a replacement then that is fine as well. Basically, I want a friendly and competitive game of chess.[/QUOTE] I will agree with you that the information leakage from within this game, before this game ends, is being a sin, and then I will ensure you that it will not repeat. Let's enjoy playing this game, give you a challenging enough game, but provided that the Demi-Gods should promise me that the team sub forums will not be wiped clean enough, afterwards, later on, being towards after this chess game ends, onwards, to. [QUOTE=Raman;322862] It seems that there is some furthermore interesting discussion or debate being going on inside our[COLOR=white] own [/COLOR] opponent's forum, than our own forum. Alas, at last some day I will hope to see what is being inside Toxic Geckos forum, threads, thread names, posts, snapshots, right at after the end of the game, quite directly. [COLOR=White]You will agree with this move. I will agree with this move. Posting analysis shortly, factors even enough furthermore succinctly.[/COLOR][/QUOTE] when the game is over, afterwards both sub forums should not be wiped clean No...I would merge them, all in one, so we could see the "evolution of the hostilities". I mean really mix the posts from here and there, in chronological order, in a single thread, and made accessible for everyone. A lot of people would like to read it (i.e. mode forum activity) me included (may be an opportunity to learn more chess too! beside of the fun) and I don't think we have something to hide, haven't we? [QUOTE=Raman;322866]... against 12...f5 move, [COLOR="white"]10...Bd7 move, e5 moves, f6 moves, Nf6 moves, Nge7 moves, Nh6 moves, thereby[/COLOR][SUP][/SUP] Supermods seeming to be playing this game furthermore energetically, frenetically than their own members, thereby. Likewise they had voted for an inferior move into our own poll system thing, stuff [url]http://mersenneforum.org/misc.php?do=whoposted&t=17604[/url] And then tracing by their own behaviour over thereby When the game is over, afterwards both sub forums should not be wiped clean[/QUOTE] For what it's being worth, the supermods had been voting for a weaker move 12...f6 move into our own voting poll system, over thereby...