![]() |
|
|
#496 |
|
Sep 2005
Raleigh, North Carolina
1010100012 Posts |
Releasing k=267 to RPS
Taking k=199 from n=250k Last fiddled with by grobie on 2006-10-04 at 22:47 |
|
|
|
|
#497 |
|
Mar 2006
Columbus, OH
7·11 Posts |
Report for 103 and 207:
103 is LLRing at 491k 207 is still sieving. -Steven |
|
|
|
|
#498 |
|
Sep 2005
Raleigh, North Carolina
337 Posts |
199*2^301193-1 (90671 digits)
|
|
|
|
|
#499 |
|
Feb 2003
22×32×53 Posts |
k=11 has reached n=1.4M,
k=29 has reached n=1.7M.
|
|
|
|
|
#500 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
k = 35 now tested to > 600k.
|
|
|
|
|
#501 |
|
Nov 2004
California
6A816 Posts |
I've stopped k=195 at n=713.8k and would like to release this k.
I'd now like to reserve k=33 (starting at 500k). Status of other k<300: 39 is at 831k 69 is at 853k 181 is at 633k 223 is at 1.34M 231 is at 946k
|
|
|
|
|
#502 |
|
May 2005
23×7×29 Posts |
k=25 tested till n=900000 - I'm still working on it
|
|
|
|
|
#503 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
I usually update my status directly in the stats page, but for the record here it is:
k=7, at 1.6M k=21, at 1M k=73, at 804k (will stop at 1M) k=77, at 1267k and 1465-1500k k=83, at 543k (got a sieve file from grobie, will stop at 550k) k=87, at 890k (most likely will stop at 1M) k=97, at 900k (would like to go to 1M) k=177, at 850k k=193, at 730k (will stop at 1M) k=277, at 744k (will stop at 1M) k=285, at 365k (passing to RPS 5th Drive at 470k) Needless to say, I don't and cannot work on all reserved Ks all the time, but I'm trying to push them all little by little. Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2006-10-14 at 00:43 |
|
|
|
|
#504 |
|
Sep 2005
Raleigh, North Carolina
337 Posts |
199*2^332985-1 (100241 digits)
|
|
|
|
|
#505 |
|
Nov 2003
1110001001102 Posts |
k=83 checked in the 536,800-550,000 range using a sieving file provided by grobie, no primes.
k=83 is similar to k=65, the weight is medium (around 2050 meaning more than 45 candidates per 1000 n's after sieving to more than 500bn), but both have relatively large primeless holes in the 200-500k range: k=65: 185,946 - 578,512 k=83: 216,954 - x, where x > 550,000 remains to be found. |
|
|
|
|
#506 |
|
Nov 2003
1110001001102 Posts |
Taking k=173.
It's the least processed k<300, to 210k only, and one known prime at 360k. I'll sieve 210k-1M but will stop early to do tests to 300k. I've been also sieving k=253 for a while in the n=1-3M range. It's the only k<300 with no known gigantic primes (with more than 10,000 digits). No plans to start testing yet... |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is CEMPLLA 1.5 "the only software in the world capable of discovering" something? Not really. | CRGreathouse | Number Theory Discussion Group | 51 | 2018-12-16 21:55 |
| Something something something... (obviously nor "Riesel Primes") | URoy | Miscellaneous Math | 15 | 2016-11-17 22:52 |
| Palindrome primes (a.k.a. Elementary S03E03 "Just a Regular Irregular") | Batalov | And now for something completely different | 12 | 2014-11-16 19:03 |
| Welcome to "Riesel Prime Search" | Kosmaj | Riesel Prime Search | 21 | 2012-09-14 09:51 |
| Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |