![]() |
|
|
#320 |
|
Jun 2003
Oxford, UK
36328 Posts |
Kosmaj
Just what a huge prime and so close to being aesthetically pleasing! Huge congrats. I have taken 15 to 620K now, with no further primes. Regards Robert Smith |
|
|
|
|
#321 |
|
Jun 2004
2×53 Posts |
I am releasing k=65, it's done until n=310k. I have sieved until 158G.
If anyone is interested in the sieve-file , just let me know! |
|
|
|
|
#322 |
|
Jun 2004
6A16 Posts |
Well...I'm reserving k=65 again!!
It's quite a heavy one though! |
|
|
|
|
#323 |
|
Jun 2004
2·53 Posts |
k=65 has been completed until n=365000, but no new primes found
It has been sieved until 200G and there are about 30000 tests leftContinuing on this k! |
|
|
|
|
#324 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
Templus
I suggest you sieve more, at least to 500G, or if you can to 1T. Especially if you plan to continue to n=500k. If you test on two machines, stop LLR on one and run NewPGen for a week. BTW, many k's produced one or more primes in the n=350-400k range and I hope k=65 will follow the pattern! Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
#325 |
|
Jun 2004
2·53 Posts |
k=65 has been tested until n=380000, sieved until 400G (still sieving), and no new primes found. About 29000 k's to test until n=1M.
|
|
|
|
|
#326 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
k=55 checked to n=520k, no new primes, stopped and released.
k=165, primes for n=221667, 236051, 246426, and 325922 checked to n=350k, in progress. And finally, after almost half a year, next prime for k=77: 77*2^855770-1 is prime (257615 digits) k=77 checked to n=857k, in progress. |
|
|
|
|
#327 |
|
Jun 2004
2·53 Posts |
k=65 has been tested until n=395000, sieved until 500G and no primes found.
I am also reserving k=149 to test until ...? Let's hope I'll find a prime for this one! :-) The top5000 says that this k has primes for n=212460, which isn't listed on the progress site Last fiddled with by Templus on 2005-06-29 at 21:42 |
|
|
|
|
#328 |
|
Nov 2003
2·1,811 Posts |
Templus,
149*2^212460-1 was found by L70, Mr. Yamada, who doesn't report either to us or to Dr. Keller. [In February, together with two other persons he found a huge Proth prime 7*2^1491852+1 with almost 450,000 digits!] So we don't know what n's he checked. I don't think he went far beyond n=230k but he definitely has resources to go much further. I'll try to contact him and I ask him. I don't have his e-mail address but I know a person who does. But k=149 has low weight and to n=212460 only 12 primes have been found. Of course the next prime can be very close but more likely it's in the 400-600k (?) range. If you want to find some primes faster I suggest k=93 or k=99, both checked only to 210k, with higher weights and many primes already found. In any case, good luck! Last fiddled with by Kosmaj on 2005-07-02 at 14:39 |
|
|
|
|
#329 |
|
Jun 2004
2·53 Posts |
Well...in that case I'll go check k=93
Thanks for your input! :) |
|
|
|
|
#330 |
|
Jun 2004
11010102 Posts |
Hi all,
k=65 has been checked until 418000, sieved until 550G (still sieving) and there are 27000 numbers left! Unfortunately, there are no new primes! I don't know what's wrong with this k, but when I find a prime, it will be quite a huge one! I saved all the RES64 numbers, so it can be double-checked later if needed. k=93 has been checked until 250000, sieved until 70G. I am working on it. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is CEMPLLA 1.5 "the only software in the world capable of discovering" something? Not really. | CRGreathouse | Number Theory Discussion Group | 51 | 2018-12-16 21:55 |
| Something something something... (obviously nor "Riesel Primes") | URoy | Miscellaneous Math | 15 | 2016-11-17 22:52 |
| Palindrome primes (a.k.a. Elementary S03E03 "Just a Regular Irregular") | Batalov | And now for something completely different | 12 | 2014-11-16 19:03 |
| Welcome to "Riesel Prime Search" | Kosmaj | Riesel Prime Search | 21 | 2012-09-14 09:51 |
| Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |