Black Move S1 (=s0^2-2=14)

[Raman]

[QUOTE=Raman;332527]16...d5
move line
[COLOR=White]side game[/COLOR]
WAY TO GO! with


[COLOR=Black][COLOR=White]being [/COLOR]from among within into[COLOR=White] for the some same [/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=White] , to be that some same way ,
whenever that this is being [/COLOR][COLOR=Black][COLOR=White] , it into them,[/COLOR] within , into into be being that own way , this own process , it into them , within , into into
[/COLOR] [COLOR=Black]they [COLOR=White]are being for the into it within , into into of r the them[/COLOR][/COLOR][/QUOTE]

If in case whether I had been there, over this thing, stuff thereby, and then I would have certainly preferred that way for the [B]14...Qc7[/B], [I]14...fxe4[/I], may be [U]14...Qd7[/U], or even might be going ahead for the 15...d5 rather instead of [COLOR=White]r[/COLOR] the 16...d5 [COLOR=White]r r [/COLOR]

Displace some Distance Any where ever and then protect saving your own queen, bishop, other pieces over thereby[I] Why so, thus[/I]

[LaurV]

I don't believe that move is good. It is too defensive. You give them the "hand" to do whatever they want. However, I don't want anymore to play games against you. Sorry.

[Raman]

[QUOTE=LaurV;333720]I don't believe that move is good. It is too defensive. You give them the "hand" to do whatever they want. [B]However, I don't want anymore to play games against you. Sorry.[/B][/QUOTE]

Why so? Are you not being happier enough with my own playing style,
[COLOR=White]into this own side game, in,[/COLOR]

or you don't have time

or you feel that pictures / images would reveal to the opponent the game progress / our own plans. Don't worry - attachments being posted onto [COLOR=White]for the own [/COLOR]
private forums are certainly being protected by using passwords [COLOR=White]style.[/COLOR]

[COLOR=White]thus, onto this fact, [/COLOR]
[B]I will assume that
you haven't developed sense of aversion towards me...[/B]

[B]certainly that way[/B]





If in case,
whether that you would not like my own playing style, then I would be rather happier enough to leave [COLOR=White]for the own side game [/COLOR]
instead [COLOR=White]of r r r

[SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP]but that which that way that certainly that always that and then for[/COLOR][COLOR=White][COLOR=White] the own side game [/COLOR][/COLOR][COLOR=White][COLOR=White]of r r r [/COLOR][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/COLOR]

[Raman]

[QUOTE=Raman;333675][COLOR=Red][B]delete [FONT=Verdana]this[/FONT] post[/B][/COLOR][/QUOTE][COLOR=Red][B][COLOR=Red][B] skip[/B][/COLOR][/B][/COLOR][COLOR=Red][B][COLOR=Red][B][COLOR=Red][B] past[/B][/COLOR][/B][/COLOR][FONT=Verdana] this[/FONT] post[/B][/COLOR]

[Raman]

taking a break [COLOR=White]onto rightly enough onto smoothly enough from over hereby from over thereby[/COLOR]
let things stuff, matters settle down, [COLOR=White]onto[/COLOR] rightly enough, [COLOR=White]onto[/COLOR] smoothly enough and then I will participate [COLOR=White]enough repeatedly up join enough quite directly enough[/COLOR]
[COLOR=White]onto smoothly enough
onto rightly enough
onto rightly enough
onto smoothly enough[/COLOR]
no counterexamples
[COLOR=White]from among within in to on order to be being to be being[/COLOR]
certainly enough that way
[COLOR=White]within into onto
[/COLOR][COLOR=White][COLOR=Black]for the while[/COLOR] for the play of r the side game r r show for the of r the r r of r r r of r r r
[/COLOR]quite directly [COLOR=White]enough[/COLOR]

[Raman]

[QUOTE=LaurV;333720]I don't believe that move is good. It is too defensive. You give them the "hand" to do whatever they want. [B]However, I don't want anymore to play games against you. Sorry.[/B][/QUOTE]
Why so? Are you not being happier enough with my own playing style,
[COLOR=White]into this own side game, in,[/COLOR]

or you don't have time

or you feel that pictures / images would reveal to the opponent the game progress / our own plans. Don't worry - attachments being posted onto [COLOR=White]for the own [/COLOR]
private forums are certainly being protected by using passwords [COLOR=White]style.[/COLOR]

[COLOR=White] thus, onto this own fact, [B]certainly that way[/B][/COLOR]
[COLOR=Lime][B]I will assume that
you haven't developed sense of aversion towards me...[/B]

[B]certainly that way[/B][/COLOR]





If in case,
whether that you would not like my own playing style, then I would be rather happier enough to leave [COLOR=White]for the own side game [/COLOR]
instead [COLOR=White]of r r r

[SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP][SUP] but that which that way that certainly that always that and then for the own side game of r r r [/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/COLOR]

[LaurV]

[QUOTE=Raman;333805]
[COLOR=Lime][B]I will assume that you haven't developed sense of aversion towards me... [/B][/COLOR]
[/QUOTE]
Certainly not. I don't know you personally, and there is a very low chance that I could develop anything - positive or negative - about a person I don't know :razz:

The real reason is that I am already spending a lot of time with the game we are "officially" playing. I may be willing to go into playing some "future" configuration of the board, but believe me or not, I [U][B]do[/B][/U] analyze on a board (classical, wooden board!) and not a computer, and it is really difficult for me to switch back to "former" old positions, and back to "actual" position. Additionally, it is difficult for me with the English notation, what it is here KQRNB, I am used with [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_piece#Piece_names"]RDTCN[/URL] (rege, dama, turn, cal, nebun), especially R and N which can make confusion, I have to be very careful when I transcribe a position from the board to the forum, and this also takes time.

I do have chess engine installed in my computer, but I tried to avoid using it, it is addictive, and I don't want that later someone says I cheated.

So, playing old configurations of the board: answer is no. I am sure there were many good moves in the past which were overseen by both white and black teams. But better let the analyze till after the game is ended.

[Dubslow]

Raman, all these duplicate posts (c.f. nos 25 and 28) are getting ridiculous. I will start deleting them, as a heads up. You are still a member of the team though, so please continue to do whatever else you normally would do (including discussing our chess game). :smile:

I'll wait 'til tomorrow to post the move to let sm_88 jump in if he wants.

[LaurV]

[QUOTE=Dubslow;333825]I'll wait 'til tomorrow to post the move to let sm_88 jump in if he wants.[/QUOTE]
Hope you talk about move 23 :P
We were discussing here move 14, Raman believing he found a better one than we played (which might be true, or not, but who cares, we played it already).

[Dubslow]

[QUOTE=LaurV;333831]Hope you talk about move 23 :P
We were discussing here move 14, Raman believing he found a better one than we played (which might be true, or not, but who cares, we played it already).[/QUOTE]

Oh. Yes, move 23. :blush:

[Raman]

[QUOTE=LaurV;333811]
Certainly not. I don't know you personally, and there is a very low chance that I could develop anything - positive or negative - about a person I don't know
[/QUOTE]

Thanks to you.
Never mind. It's being good enough not to spend time wasting onto an old move line for the side game being played for the satisfaction.

I have been having a doubt if in case whether some of team members have been having a dislike towards me,
because I have been posting lots of junk, here, lately enough, :poop: white font text inundating with useless words, worthless / meaningless sentences.

Sorry.

I have been facing some type of mental disorders lately enough, problems with keyboard typing, any type of disturbance / distractions being prevalent within onto me as.

Without me, the chess game discussion went onto smoothly.
This team has been a bit slow / unresponsive enough from the time slice as since - as whenever I had rejoined within onto as
I had been suspecting if in case whether I am being problem with team.
If in case so whether, I will have for the time being no problem in order to leave from within this playing side game, officially, that way.

[QUOTE=LaurV;333720]
I don't believe that move is good. It is too defensive. You give them the "hand" to do whatever they want. However, I don't want anymore to play games against you. Sorry.
[/QUOTE][COLOR=White]within[/COLOR]
Into for the beginning / starting, for the game went onto smoothly even with[COLOR=White]in Into[/COLOR] me, as within [COLOR=White]onto [COLOR=Black]for[/COLOR][/COLOR] the opening; even I lead for the opening Into!
[COLOR=White] onto within as Into within onto within as Into[/COLOR]
[QUOTE=Dubslow;333825]Raman, all these duplicate posts (c.f. nos 25 and 28) are getting ridiculous. I will start deleting them, as a heads up. You are still a member of the team though, so please continue to do whatever else you normally would do (including discussing our chess game).

I'll wait 'til tomorrow to post the move to let sm_88 jump in if he wants.[/QUOTE]

And if in case whether you want to wishing deleting duplicate posts, then I would suggest always deleting [B]earlier[/B] version, as since later posted version
would be always an enough updated post version than whenever being compared to the older post version always.

Leave this thread / post, there is being no information to share / convey here. This is being a private discussion forum... who cares?

But that way, which into the thread "Representation by a²+kb² forms", there are a good number of duplicate posts, that are being almost always
an updated version of the erroneous earlier post versions. The older post versions could always be deleted into as such cases as, if in case whether whenever
you could see with a duplicate post, me posting. Now, that there are being a good amount of seven to eight posts that would need
deletion into that very posted thread.

These posts, as such as, are being shorter enough. But that way, which as since as, it is always being difficult enough in order to review with errors
sooner enough for the bigger enough posts into threads. Now, that the errors may be overlooked for time being. Later on, to unfortunately,
an error might be lying / sleeping enough in order to catch our own eyes, being, to be, being, an irritating factor always.

[QUOTE=LaurV;333831]Hope you talk about move 23 :P
We were discussing here move 14, Raman believing he found a better one than we played (which might be true, or not, but who cares, we played it already).[/QUOTE]

For the first few initial moves, or most of moves, good moves can never be unique enough!

It's sometimes being good enough in order to leave decision onto other team members opinion / judgement after afterwards I have been made playing a move line. No?
This way all people will get enough, chances, turns, onto that way. Not? Playing side game, over, thereby!

For the 16...d5, 17...c4, 18...dxe4 move lines are being forced enough, therefore, I will easily concur onto them!

But that way, which if in case whether I had been there onto this,
onto an any unbanned state, some how, and then, as follows as, things, stuffs, items, ideas - set, list, collection
I would have gone ahead after onto 14...Qc7, 14...fxe4, 14...Qd7, [strike]14...e5[/strike] no 14...e5 playing style being, to be, being not needed, [COLOR=White]never! and then
onto that way, it into this, within onto them, never! and then[/COLOR]
Afterwards, I will go there, giving an hand onto 15...d5, 15...fxe4
I will went onto 13...f5, 13...Qc7, 13...Qd7, 13...d5, 13...e5, 13...Nc6, [strike]13...f6[/strike] no 13...f6 playing style being, to be, being not needed, [COLOR=White]never! and then
onto that way, it into this, within onto them, never! and then[/COLOR]
being playing