![]() |
|
|
#45 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Liverpool (GMT/BST)
3·23·89 Posts |
if you use the formula
latency/frequency*1000=nanoseconds that is on wikipedia then the 1866 performs the best on the things it is 9 for. The thing it is 10 for it is slower than the 2133. However bandwidth is more of an issue with prime95 I believe. The 2133 obviously wins with that. In dual channel I am not sure what is required to get the best out of the cpu. 1866 might be enough bandwidth but I would personally go for the 2133 as there is so little price difference. Memory is so cheap currently. Unfortunately I am still stuck on ddr2 myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
37·59 Posts |
I believe mfaktx does not use memory that much, while CUDALucas does.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Android app recommendations | Uncwilly | Lounge | 11 | 2020-10-07 12:40 |
| Site Hosting Recommendations | wombatman | Lounge | 5 | 2017-05-18 18:06 |
| Hardware recommendations for factoring | Mr. Odd | Hardware | 7 | 2016-06-02 01:07 |
| Hardware recommendations | Mr. Odd | Factoring | 12 | 2011-11-19 00:32 |
| Recommendations (courses) | blob100 | Other Mathematical Topics | 20 | 2010-06-20 18:11 |