![]() |
|
|
#34 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Still have to remove and replace the powercord to get the machine to reboot though. However, I now have a machine that rund GMP-ECM at one hell of a rate. Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,739 Posts |
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...04/07/3/198185 has:
Quote:
You've switched off "plug and play" in the BIOS haven't you? I know the following is RedHat but http://www.redhat.com/support/resour...-hardware.html says: Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2005-10-12 at 07:54 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
As for rebooting, I know you're not entirely serious but there are very good reasons for rebooting any kind of box, Linux or otherwise. Installing and configuring an OS is one of them! Another important one is when patching any of several varieties of security vulnerabilities and one wants to be certain that all in-memory copies of the vulnerability have gone. I also recognize the implied dig at other operating systems, suggesting that Linux is better than them. My personal experience (which goes back 25 years, most of which I've spent as a sysadmin) is that Linux needs rebooting about as often as most modern operating systems, by which I mean FreeBSD, MacOS X, Sloaris and Windows XP Pro / 2003 Server. Sometime if we want to swap horror stories, I can tell you about Unix boxes that were as unreliable as any Win9x system. One in particular had such a bad memory leak that we ran prophylactic reboots three times weekly, just to keep it somewhat usable. Other bugs ensured that it crashed or had to be rebooted over and above the scheduled shutdowns. Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
1075310 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Much Googling turned up that the ATI chipset is seriously broken (no surprise there) but that adding no_timer_check to Grub's kernel parameters would make things behave themselves. Paul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Oct 2004
232 Posts |
Xilman wrote "Trying to install amd64-gentoo on a 3500+ box and having a frustrating time of it"
Paul, have you tried the 64 bit version of Suse and do you get the same issue with it? 64 bit version of Suse 10 OPENSUSE can be downloaded via opensuse.org links. As the servers for Novell Suse and Opensuse are quite busy with downloads may I suggest you go with Opensuse, and further that you perform the download using the distributed bittorrent technique rather than ftp/http. It's five CDs but you may find your problem goes away because Suse have had quite a bit of 64 bit experience with previous versions 9.X. As for the other problem, make sure ACPI is enabled in bios, make sure you installed the ACPI version of the linux (on some distros like suse its an option). For me the command shutdown now -r does as requested and does not just shutdown but restarts the machine and reboots as requested. I assume this is what is trying to be achieved rather than just shutdown and halt (freeze). Last fiddled with by Peter Nelson on 2005-10-13 at 23:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
373910 Posts |
I am slowly converting most of my boxes to Debian because it can have a small footprint and is easy to ugpgrade with apt-get or aptitude using ssh.
My desktop is now Ubuntu which is dead easy to install and has a vast array of programs available to download and install at the click of a button. I have box that is Gentoo (and will not be emerging gnome on it )I also have one multi-boot box that has Mandrake2006, Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Linspire5.0, Gentoo and Slackware. I am going to install Fedora, FreeBSD and "Slowaris" on it too Maybe I try some others later... |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Good Linux distro for a beginner | ThomRuley | Linux | 17 | 2004-08-30 01:12 |