Trippple Checks - Page 58

GP2 · 2017-08-18, 08:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's a list of the latest exponents that need a triple-check (first two mismatched).

Some of these are already assigned or done, here's what remains:

Code:

DoubleCheck=57453983,73,1
DoubleCheck=72334631,75,1
DoubleCheck=75857183,75,1
DoubleCheck=77377661,75,1
DoubleCheck=77380019,75,1
DoubleCheck=77569637,75,1

Madpoo · 2017-08-18, 22:57

Here's an updated/new list of triple-checks needed:

Code:

GP2 · 2017-08-19, 21:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Here's an updated/new list of triple-checks needed:

I took:

Code:

ewmayer · 2017-08-20, 03:01

I grabbed the remaining untaken ones close to the upper exponent limit of an Mlucas FFT length:

57143657
57453983
72113243
72334631
77569637

Aaron, for those of us picking expos from these lists you put out, it would be really handy to enhance the current "Optional exponent range" feature of the manual tests page with an "Exponent list" option: user pastes 1 or more expos into the list-entry field, server assigns all which are currently unreserved. How hard would that be to implement on your end?

kladner · 2017-08-20, 11:14

Would someone run a triple (quad?) check for 44034871? I mismatched an Anon result in which Anon seems to have run back-to-back LLs.

Madpoo · 2017-08-21, 20:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

Would someone run a triple (quad?) check for 44034871? I mismatched an Anon result in which Anon seems to have run back-to-back LLs.

The 2 other results were actually just one result. Looks like there's an overlap in the history section where a v4 result was added in, but it was actually already present in the v5 logs.

Yeah, strange as it was, there were in fact some imported v4 logs up to as late as Sep 2011... some of those, if I recall, were cases where people still emailed their results to George, for instance.

Interesting though... maybe I should look for other cases of overlap.

Anyway, that only affects the "history" section... there was only the single recorded result for it, as it should be.

kladner · 2017-08-21, 21:56

That is comforting to hear. I really don't want another bad result.

ATH · 2017-08-23, 17:08

Unfortunately it was bad

https://mersenne.org/M44034871

kladner · 2017-08-23, 18:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATH

Unfortunately it was bad

https://mersenne.org/M44034871

Thanks for running it. This one is kind of a surprise. I thought I was in a known stable setup. Time for more testing.

GP2 · 2017-09-17, 09:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madpoo

Ahh... you're right about that. To avoid changing the database so it just uses "-Anonymous-" in all cases, I was being too clever by half when I modified the exponent report page. I didn't want to change it in the DB without making sure it wouldn't affect anything else.

Unfortunately I forgot about the report_ll page...

I just tweaked it as well. I need to test it a bit more and make sure I got it swapped out in all the correct spots and then I'll make it live. Good catch.

The Recent Cleared page also uses ANONYMOUS exclusively, although clicking through the exponent to the PrimeNet Exponent Status page shows that some of them are -Anonymous- instead.

ATH · 2017-09-20, 23:01

I managed to run my own double check by mistake. I forgot to check them:
http://mersenne.org/M44356541

If anyone got time at some point to do another run.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Double checks	casmith789	PrimeNet	7	2015-05-26 00:53
Help doing some quadrup1e+ checks	Madpoo	Data	28	2015-04-06 17:01
Double checks	Rastus	Data	1	2003-12-19 18:20
How do I get rid of the Triple Checks??	outlnder	Lounge	4	2003-04-07 18:06
Double-checks come in pairs?	BigRed	Software	1	2002-10-20 05:29

2017-08-20, 03:01	#631
ewmayer ∂²ω=0 Sep 2002 República de California 5×17×137 Posts	I grabbed the remaining untaken ones close to the upper exponent limit of an Mlucas FFT length: 57143657 57453983 72113243 72334631 77569637 Aaron, for those of us picking expos from these lists you put out, it would be really handy to enhance the current "Optional exponent range" feature of the manual tests page with an "Exponent list" option: user pastes 1 or more expos into the list-entry field, server assigns all which are currently unreserved. How hard would that be to implement on your end?

2017-08-20, 11:14	#632
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 10011110101110₂ Posts	Would someone run a triple (quad?) check for 44034871? I mismatched an Anon result in which Anon seems to have run back-to-back LLs.

2017-08-21, 21:56	#634
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 10158₁₀ Posts	That is comforting to hear. I really don't want another bad result.

2017-08-23, 17:08	#635
ATH Einyen Dec 2003 Denmark 7×11×41 Posts	Unfortunately it was bad https://mersenne.org/M44034871

2017-09-20, 23:01	#638
ATH Einyen Dec 2003 Denmark 7·11·41 Posts	I managed to run my own double check by mistake. I forgot to check them: http://mersenne.org/M44356541 If anyone got time at some point to do another run.