Trippple Checks

[Dubslow]

Originally Posted by S485122

I had your first mismatch on a slower machine; I transferred it to another that should finish it round 2017-03-31 16:00 UTC.

Jacob

Much appreciated I wasn't so fussed with just the one mismatch, I'm plenty patient, but with two at the same time... that has me rather more worried for the quality of my machine

[stebbo]

please triple check 45465307

same machine that has previously had a bad and a suspect result. I may have to retire this machine from the program. :-(

[GP2]

Originally Posted by stebbo

please triple check 45465307

Looks like Madpoo is already on it.

The machine that did the first test seems to have a less than perfect record, so there's hope.

[S485122]

Originally Posted by Dubslow

Much appreciated I wasn't so fussed with just the one mismatch, I'm plenty patient, but with two at the same time... that has me rather more worried for the quality of my machine

Out results matched on 39655643.

Jacob

[Dubslow]

Originally Posted by S485122

Out results matched on 39655643.

Jacob

Ah, that's a relief. I guess I just got lucky to get two bad-first-tests at the same time

Thanks for switching to a faster machine for me.

[S485122]

Originally Posted by Dubslow

...
Thanks for switching to a faster machine for me.

I had to : the new version of prime95 has another way of using the "RollingAverage" compared to previous versions. As a consequence the slower machine was given too many work units with the cat 0 as last one !

Jacob

[Madpoo]

Originally Posted by GP2

MadPoo grabs a lot of double-check assignments. If exponents are not urgent he lets them sit for a while until it's their turn in the queue, however he routinely does them to 0.1% first, presumably because that immunizes them from the weird sporadic "spontaneous unreserving" bug.

I don't grab more than I can complete in ~ 20 days or so. I used to grab enough for 60 days at a time to keep me from micro-managing the worktodo files as much but then I had some exponents expiring because I do all my assignments manually and if I didn't report at least some update, they were expiring on me too soon.

I guess I don't really have that problem now since I'm not getting as much in advance, but yeah, I report it as being started anyway just to be sure. On the odd chance I get a cat 0 assignment (just happened a couple days ago) I move it to the front of the queue.

Right now I queue them up in the order I assign them, but if there's an interesting one (a quad check, or if I'm looking at one of those false positives) I bump it to the top.

[Mark Rose]

I've been playing with undervolting. Could someone kindly quickly triple check M79819147 please?

[kladner]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I've been playing with undervolting. Could someone kindly quickly triple check M79819147 please?

Registered. ETA 4 days 10 hours.

[Mark Rose]

Originally Posted by kladner

Registered. ETA 4 days 10 hours.

Thank you!

[kladner]

Originally Posted by Mark Rose

I've been playing with undervolting. Could someone kindly quickly triple check M79819147 please?

My result matched yours.