![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: When will the first 10 million digit prime number be found? | |||
| 0, I am not currently running gimps, there is no client for my PDA. |
|
3 | 3.30% |
| 1, I believe GIMPS is a good use of my time, but am not so in to it as a hobby. |
|
24 | 26.37% |
| 2-3, I have a small home network, or have my home and work machine on gimps. |
|
25 | 27.47% |
| 4-6, I have a small network at home/a few machines at work I admin. |
|
24 | 26.37% |
| 7-15, It is an obcession, true, but one I dreadfully enjoy. This is my mark on history. |
|
15 | 16.48% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#12 |
|
Jan 2003
North Carolina
111101102 Posts |
Hmmm... I did a very simplistic log curve fit to come up with M42 being the 10M prime; I'm not a mathematician so maybe I was too simplistic. Actually what I was after was the range of candidates for P to be the next M over 10M. That's a different goal then predicting M42 .vs. M45.
Can someone explain to me why log2(log2(n)) is used to match where the current mersenne primes are located/predictied? Seems to me that using p (as in 2^P-1) based on log(p) is pretty close too. I used Excel and worked the numbers using a first order polynomial curve fit of log(p) until they seemed to line up. I don't understand the double log2()'s (I'm not even sure I understand log2 very well). Thanks -=- john. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
101101011101112 Posts |
Quote:
The reason the base-2 log is "natural" for Mersenne numbers is that taking log2 of M(p) (M(p)+1 actually, but for p large the difference rapidly becomes negligible) yields the Mersenne exponent p. Then, if we're talking about a trend like the well-known conjecture of Wagstaff (and others) that the ratio of successive M-prime exponents is on average close to a constant, another way of putting that is that plotting the logarithm (to any base) of the p's of M-primes will yield a scatter plot that is well-fit by a straight line. Since we used log2 to get p, it makes sense to also use log2 for the scatter plot, that way we don't wind up with mixed-base logarithms, as in log(log2(M(p))). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Smallest prime with a digit sum of 911 | Stargate38 | Puzzles | 6 | 2014-09-29 14:18 |
| Wowww!!! Exactly 4 digit prime!!! | Merfighters | Lounge | 39 | 2013-04-12 20:26 |
| 44-digit factor found using ECM w/ B1=1e6 & B2=1e8 | WVU Mersenneer | Factoring | 8 | 2010-04-24 17:01 |
| 160 digit factor found of 366 digit (PRP-1) | AntonVrba | Factoring | 7 | 2005-12-06 22:02 |
| 10 digit prime in e | TTn | 15k Search | 15 | 2004-10-18 03:11 |