![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
10110111110002 Posts |
I was just surprised to notice that singleton removal just ran 95 passes on a c118. What is the highest anyone has had?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
From the logs which I did not delete yet (I clear them regularly) it seems that I have every number between 9 and 21 many times, and i even saw a 33 and a 41. It does not seems to be any bigger.
(edit: I saw a 7 too, and I have no idea for which number is the 41, I have to put in correspondence the timing in the nfs.log where the 41 appears with the timing in the factor.log where the number to be factored appears, and I am too lazy to do that now, 22:45 here) Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2012-07-31 at 15:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
67258 Posts |
The closer you get to the crossover point between filtering failing and filtering succeeding but producing a terrible matrix, the larger the number of singleton-removal passes you need to do. It has something to do with the connectivity of the graph of large factors in the dataset; you have a huge number of relations that are connected to each other in groups, with a tiny bit of connectivity between the groups. Get rid of those few links and the whole dataset collapses into singletons that must be pruned, but add a few more relations and suddenly most of the data is not singletons anymore.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| checking very large number for primality. | WhoCares | Math | 51 | 2017-04-20 17:17 |
| Bug with particular large number | VolMike | YAFU | 18 | 2012-04-09 21:39 |
| Sieving a Large Number of k's | Dougal | Conjectures 'R Us | 1 | 2010-06-17 21:48 |
| Large number of Exponents Assigned | dave_0273 | Data | 2 | 2004-03-11 16:15 |
| Is this a relatively large number? | MavsFan | Math | 3 | 2003-12-12 02:23 |