![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
22·863 Posts |
Is there no way to run BPSW test on Wagstaff numbers? I know the Vrba-Reix test is a possible prime proof, but haven't been fully proven yet. But I just wanted the option to run BPSW as well, but whatever options I choose, I only get Strong Fermat and/or Vrba-Reix.
Last fiddled with by ATH on 2013-09-09 at 16:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5·937 Posts |
Although not BPSW, PFGW will do fermat+lucas with -tp/-tm/-tc
![]() edit: maybe test -tm only does fermat prp and -tp does a lucas prp test. So use -tc (combined test,) if not -tp followed by -tm. edit 2: reading the readme.txt from the latest LLR: Quote:
Code:
./llr64 -oBPSW=1 -q"(2^83339+1)/3" Invalid expression in command line. Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2013-09-09 at 17:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
22·863 Posts |
Well BPSW for Wagstaff numbers is just a Lucas test, since they all pass the 2-spsp test. But it would still be nice to run that, and maybe the Frobenius test on them as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Oct 2012
38 Posts |
Is there a manual for LLR? I'm new to prime testing and want to use LLR to test some new prime ideas I have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
May 2005
162810 Posts |
Quote:
![]() BTW: Does anyone know if factoring code in cll64.exe is 64bit or 32bit? Last fiddled with by Cruelty on 2013-10-31 at 08:47 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LLR Version 3.8.20 released | Jean Penné | Software | 30 | 2018-08-13 20:00 |
| LLR Version 3.8.19 released | Jean Penné | Software | 11 | 2017-02-23 08:52 |
| LLR Version 3.8.15 released | Jean Penné | Software | 28 | 2015-08-04 04:51 |
| LLR Version 3.8.11 released | Jean Penné | Software | 37 | 2014-01-29 16:32 |
| llr 3.8.2 released as dev-version | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 11 | 2010-11-18 18:24 |