![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
May 2005
31348 Posts |
Thanks for the hint. Below line will launch an instance of cllr64.exe to run on CPU6 (actually 4th physical core of 3770K) - it took me a while to understand the "affinity mask"
![]() Code:
start "cllr3" /affinity 40 cllr64.exe Fiddling with llr.ini and setting Verbose=1 doesn't help, window remains blank... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11100101011012 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
May 2005
110010111002 Posts |
Code:
-d Print detailed information to stdout. ![]() ![]() One observation though: base=2 tests every 10k iterations are presented in a separate line on the screen, whereas base=113 status is updated in the same line... Last fiddled with by Cruelty on 2012-09-22 at 17:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
3×2,447 Posts |
Probably due to the use of \n instead of \r in the code somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Mar 2006
2·277 Posts |
Quote:
The user can perform a work-around to get the desired behavior. On the top of the command window, right-click on the title bar (in the image, next to where it says "cllr3") and then select properties. Then select the Layout tab and increase the width to 100. (90 might work, but 100 definitely will) And in this wider window it should only print on one line. Let us know if this works for you. To fix it from a developers perspective, the word iteration should be changed to bit, as it is in the cllrX program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
May 2005
31348 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
22×863 Posts |
I tried to factor (28191+1)/3, but I guess the exponent is too low? It just says "1 candidates factored, 0 factors found, 1 remaining" in the lresults.txt without doing anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2×5×11×47 Posts |
How to resume work with llr64 console version on windows? What's the flag?
Edit: found it, -d. Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2013-02-22 at 14:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
22·863 Posts |
I know the "Vrba-Reix algorithm" for Wagstaff numbers are not fully proven, it is only a prp test. But when it says "not prime" then the number is composite with 100% certainty right? No need to run a strong fermat PRP test as well?
Edit: Nevermind. I didn't read the readme.txt properly, it gave me the answer: Quote:
Last fiddled with by ATH on 2013-02-28 at 13:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
2·5·11·47 Posts |
Is there a LLR Version 3.8.9 for MS Windows 64bit, GUI version?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Dec 2011
After 1.58M nines:)
1,699 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LLR Version 3.8.20 released | Jean Penné | Software | 30 | 2018-08-13 20:00 |
| LLR Version 3.8.19 released | Jean Penné | Software | 11 | 2017-02-23 08:52 |
| LLR Version 3.8.15 released | Jean Penné | Software | 28 | 2015-08-04 04:51 |
| LLR Version 3.8.11 released | Jean Penné | Software | 37 | 2014-01-29 16:32 |
| llr 3.8.2 released as dev-version | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 11 | 2010-11-18 18:24 |